, Russian Federation
student
, Russian Federation
Currently, the Russian economy is facing a number of exogenous and endogenous challenges that hinder economic growth and development. The budget policy of the state can, through the use of fiscal instruments, support declining business activity, which, on the one hand, requires an increase in public spending, including investment, and, on the other hand, a reduction in the tax burden. The paper presents an analysis of the most successful examples of using fiscal tools in modern Russia. The purpose of the article is to analyze the domestic experience of using fiscal instruments and identify the most effective tools for stimulating economic growth. Statistical methods, a systematic approach, and integral analysis were used as the methodological basis of the study. Having studied the best practices of applying fiscal instruments in Russia, the authors identified the most effective tax and budget instruments. Conclusions are drawn about the greatest effectiveness of the application of proportional taxation of personal income and reduction of indirect tax rates. Among the budget instruments, spending on R & D financing, increasing budget investment in infrastructure projects, and human capital are of particular importance. Based on the results of the study, theoretical and practical proposals for adjusting the current budget policy of Russia are formulated.
fiscal instruments, fiscal policy, economic growth, budget investments, R & D expenditures, tax rates
1. Rayzberg B.A., Lozovskiy L.Sh., Starodubceva E.B. Sovremennyy ekonomicheskiy slovar'. 6-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: INFRA-M, 2019. 512 s.
2. Sayt Mezhdunarodnogo Valyutnogo Fonda. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=1992&ey=2023&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=922&s=NGDP_RPCH,PPPGDP,PPPPC,PCPIPCH,LUR,GGXWDG_NGDP&grp=0&a=&pr.x=36&pr.y=5 (data obrascheniya: 30.03.2020)
3. Ehigiamusoe K.U., Lean H.H. Do economic and financial integration stimulate economic growth? a critical survey. Economics - The Open Access Open-Assessment E-Journal. 2019. 13. S. 1-27.
4. Likhosherstova G.N., Solovyov A.B., Sazonova N.V., Yakovenko N.V. Globalization of the world economic-innovative process and its effect on the cluster policy of the Russian Federation in the field of formation of spatial organization of the territory. Research result. Economic research. 2016. S. 15–20.
5. Kondakova A.S. Rol' nalogov v sovremennoy ekonomike. // Obrazovanie i nauka bez granic: social'no-gumanitarnye nauki. 2017. № 8. S. 233–237.
6. Istoriya novoy Rossii: ocherki, interv'yu : v 3 t. / pod obsch. red. P.S. Filippova. SPb.: NORMA, 2011. 677 s.
7. Slepneva L.R. Rol' nalogov v stimulirovanii ekonomicheskogo rosta regionov // Vestnik sovremennyh issledovaniy. 2019. S. 108–112.
8. Usoskin V.M., Belousova V.Yu., Chichkanov N.Yu. Mirovoy opyt organizacii i finansirovaniya NIOKR na primere SShA i ES // Mezhdunarodnye processy. 2019. S. 38–61.
9. Steshenko Ju.A., Tikhonova A.V. An integral approach to evaluating the effectiveness of tax incentives. Journal of Tax Reform. 2018. S. 157-173.
10. Konno T. Network effect of knowledge spillover: scale-free networks stimulate R&D activities and accelerate economic growth. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2016. S. 157-167.
11. Mazanceva M.G., Kryukova A.A. Vliyanie innovacionnyh tehnologiy na ekonomicheskoe razvitie obschestva v Rossii // Alleya nauki. 2017. № 10. S. 829–833.
12. Altunyan A.G., Kocofana T.V. Prioritety ekonomicheskoy politiki v obespechenii usloviy ustoychivogo ekonomicheskogo rosta // Finansy i kredit. 2019. S. 1821-1834.
13. Semenova N.N. Byudzhetnaya politika Rossii i neoindustrializaciya: sovremennye realii // Finansy i kredit. 2018. S. 255–271.
14. Kolodina A.A., Adamskaya L.V. Problemy ekonomicheskogo rosta v sovremennoy Rossii // Mirovye civilizacii. 2017. S. 1–5.
15. Kosov M.E. Byudzhetnaya politika Rossiyskoy Federacii: problemy i puti ih resheniya // Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. 2016. S. 847–855.
16. Kuz'min I.D., Shibanihin E.A., Thakahova M.O. Infrastrukturnye investicii kak faktor stimulirovaniya ekonomicheskogo rosta // Innovacionnoe razvitie. 2018. S. 125–127.
17. Khan K., Su C.-W., Tao R., Yang L. Does remittance outflow stimulate or retard economic growth? International Migration. 2019. S. 105-120.
18. Averkina S.G., Schukina N.A. Faktory ekonomicheskogo rosta Rossii // Problemy sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2020. S. 9–11.
19. Chalova A.Yu., Omshanova E.A. Byudzhet stimulirovaniya ekonomicheskogo rosta, ili kak ne vyyti za ramki byudzhetnogo pravila // Federalizm. 2018. S. 115-133.
20. Alandarov R.A., Zayceva E.A. Sravnitel'naya harakteristika istochnikov finansirovaniya deficitov federal'nyh byudzhetov Rossii i SShA // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika. 2019. № 4. S. 57–62.
