The article considers the topical problems of protecting civil rights and responsibility during the implementation of the civil law protecting power in Latin America. The development trend of harmonization has led to the creation of the Latin American principles of contract law. In the Peruvian legislation, a set of all elements of a civil offense, which includes a causal link, the presence of loss, guilt and illegality of actions, forms the basis of contractual liability. The amount of recoverable damages includes reparation of not only the actual damage, but also loss of profits if they are a direct result of the default. Analyzing the Brazilian law, the author notes that the breach of an obligation may be in the form of a delay in its execution. The debtor is considered overdue when he does not make payments, and the creditor, too, who does not wish to receive it. The debtor is responsible for the damages caused by his delay. If due to the delay the payment becomes useless to the creditor, he is entitled to reject it and claim damages. In the law of Ecuador, the recoverable damages include the incurred damages and lost profits arising from non-execution or improper execution of the obligation. In the cases provided for by law, recoverable damages are limited to the extent of the damage.
defense of civil rights, responsibility in civil law in countries of Latin America.
1. Donnini R. F. A revisão dos contratos no Código Civil e no Código de Defesa do Consumidor. São Paulo. Saraiva, 1999.
2. Enneccerus L. Derecho das Obligaciones. Tratado de Derecho Civil. T. 2. Vol. 1. Ludwig Ennecerus, Theodor Kipp y Martin Wolf. Barcelona, 1933.
3. Fradera V. M. J. de. A quebra positiva do contrato. Ajuris. Vol. 44. 1988.
4. Jhering R. von. Culpa in Contrahendo oder Schadensersatz bei nichtigen oder nicht zur Perfection gelanten Verträgen. Vol. I. Jena, 1881.
5. Kopcke G. Typen der positiven Vertragsverletzung. Stuttgart, 1965.
6. Martins-Costa J. H. O Novo Código Civil Brasileiro: Em Busca da ‘Ética da Situação”. Diretrizes Teóricas do Novo Código Civil Brasileiro. São Paulo2002. A. P. Velloso. Mutações paradigmáticas da codificação: do Código Civil de 1916 ao Código Civil de 2002. Porto Alegre, 2004.
7. Reale M. Exposição de Motivos do Projeto de Código Civil. Subsecretaria de Edições Técnicas do Senado Federal. Brasília, 2005.
8. Schipani S. La codificazione del diritto romano commune. 2 ed. Torino, 1999.
9. Silva L. R. F. da. Revisão dos contratos: do código civil ao código de defesa do consumidor. Rio de Janeiro, 1999. Azevedo Cardoso L. P. T. A onerosidade excessiva no Direito Civil brasileiro. Dissertação de mestrado. USP, 2010.
10. Vitryanskiy V. V., Braginskiy M. I. Otvetstvennost´ za narushenie dogovora. Dogovornoe pravo. Obshchie polozheniya. M., 2002.
11. Gribanov A. Otvetstvennost´ za neispolnenie dogovornykh obyazatel´stv v prave Anglii i SShA. Khozyaystvo i pravo. 1996. № 7.
12. Gribanov V. P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M., 2000 i dr.
13. Dogovornaya otvetstvennost´ po zarubezhnomu pravu (analiticheskiy obzor). Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2000. № 1.
14. Illarionova T. I. Sistema grazhdansko-pravovykh okhranitel´nykh mer. Tomsk, 1985.
15. Ioffe O. S. Obyazatel´stvennoe pravo. M., 1975.
16. Pravo stran Latinskoy Ameriki: kodifikatsiya material´nogo i protsessual´nogo grazhdanskogo prava / pod red. V. V. Bezbakha, V. F. Pon´ka. M., 2013.
17. Ul´yanishchev V. G. Ispolnenie dogovornykh obyazatel´stv. Grazhdanskoe i torgovoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran / pod obshch. red. V. V. Bezbakha, V. K. Puchinskogo. M., 2004.
18. Tsvaygert K., Ketts Kh. Vvedenie v sravnitel´noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava. T. 2. M., 1998.
