Clause is devoted to research of a legal regulation of the organization and activity of the self-adjustable organizations on sense of constitutional freedom of economic activities. In opinion of the author, the institute of the self-adjustable organizations favourably differs from the state intervention in market economy as it allows the most enterprise community to supervise this sphere in the form of standardization of corporate behaviour, establishments of special and not state rules and procedures.
self–regulation, freedom of economic activities, the constitutional economy, the state intervention
1. Avaev M., Vasilenko N. O «samoregulirovanii» kak odnom iz sposobov regulirovaniya ekonomicheskikh protsessov v Rossiyskoy Fede-ratsii. Aktual´nye problemy rossiyskogo zakonodatel´stva: Sbornik statey. – M.: Lado-mir, 2011.
2. Akopov L.V. Demokraticheskiy kontrol´ kak gosudarstvenno-pravovoy institut: diss… kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 1997.
3. Astafichev P.A. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii. – M.: RIOR, 2016.
4. Belov V.A. Samoreguliruemaya organizatsiya kak sub´´ekt obshchestvennykh otnosheniy. Vserossiyskaya studencheskaya yuridicheskaya olimpiada 2014 g. – M.: Yurist, 2014.
5. Gorbunov M.A. Kategoriya interesa kak opredelyayushchiy faktor logiko-yuridicheskogo soderzhaniya norm rimskogo chastnogo prava. Zakon i pravo. – 2011. – № 2.
6. Ivanova S. Osobennosti formirovaniya demokraticheskoy sistemy sotsial´nogo kontrolya v RF. Problemy razvitiya pravovoy sistemy sovremennoy Rossii. – Kurgan: KGU, 2009.
7. Kirillovykh A.A. Upolnomochennyy po pravam predprinimateley: osnovy pravovogo statusa v sisteme pravozashchitnykh institutov. Zakonodatel´stvo i ekonomika. – 2013. – № 11.
8. Kotelevskaya I.V. Antikorruptsionnye korporativnye programmy i standarty vedeniya biznesa. Zakony dlya pol´zy i bezopasnosti lyudey. – Vladimir: Atlas, 2014.
9. Kuzin A.V. Soderzhanie i vidy publichnykh interesov. Problemy pravovedeniya. – Kaliningrad: RGU im. I.Kanta, 2010.
10. Leskova Yu.G. Samoregulirovanie kak ekonomicheskoe i pravovoe yavlenie. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2011. – № 5.
11. Leskova Yu.G. Samoreguliruemaya organizatsiya kak pravovaya model´ vnedreniya i razvitiya sotsial´nogo predprinimatel´stva. Yurist. – 2013. – № 11.
12. Lomaev A.Yu. Chastnyy i publichnyy inte-res kak parnye pravovye kategorii: problema sootnosheniya i obespecheniya balansa. Problemy rossiyskogo zakonodatel´stva: istoriya i sovremennost´. – Samara: SGA, 2012.
13. Mikova E.B. Gosudarstvennaya zashchita sub´´ektov predprinimatel´skoy deyatel´nosti kak prioritetnoe napravlenie razvitiya zakonodatel´stva o biznese v Rossii: na primere uchrezhdeniya Upolnomochennykh po zashchite prav predprinimateley v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Predprinimatel´skoe pravo. – 2013. – № 4.
14. Panteleev B.N. Korporativnye eticheskie standarty kak sredstvo obespecheniya vzaimodeystviya pravookhranitel´nykh organov s obshchestvennost´yu i sredstvami massovoy informatsii. – M.: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2008.
15. Petrov D.A. Pravovye i ekonomicheskie predposylki samoregulirovaniya v sfere predprinimatel´stva. Pravovedenie. – 2010. –№ 2.
16. Polyanskiy D.V. Samoreguliruemaya organizatsiya v rossiyskom prave: institut grazhdanskogo obshchestva ili organ publichnoy vlasti?. Aktual´nye problemy pravovedeniya. – 2013.– № 1.
17. Romanovskaya O.V. Notarial´naya palata, publichnaya korporatsiya, samoreguliruemaya organizatsiya: problemy terminologii. Notarius. – 2005. – № 5.
18. Sergeev S.G. Upolnomochennyy po zashchite prav predprinimateley: spetsifika vnekonstitutsionnogo politicheskogo lobbi-instituta. Otvetstvennost´ vlasti pered grazhdanskim obshchestvom: mekhanizmy kontrolya i vzaimodeystviya. – Saratov: Povolzh. in-t upravleniya, 2014.
19. Stankevich G.V. Upolnomochennyy po pravam predprinimateley v mekhanizme zashchity prav predprinimateley. Aktual´nye problemy sovremennogo rossiyskogo prava. – Nevinnomyssk: NGGTI, 2014.
20. Tret´yakova S.B. Samoreguliruemaya organizatsiya - osobyy sub´´ekt prava. Administrativnoe i munitsipal´noe pravo.–2013. – №5.
21. Ulizko K.A. Soglasovanie administrativnykh protsedur sub´´ektami gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal´nogo kontrolya s organami prokuratury pri provedenii proverok khozyaystvuyushchikh sub´´ektov. Aktual´nye problemy prava. – Khabarovsk: DVGUPS, 2012.
