There are a lot of different methods and approaches to program planning. Unfortunately they do not cover all the program managers’ requirements: existing approaches and methods or their combinations do not allow monitoring program stages as well as all the details simultaneously. At the same time they don’t help to develop and implement the changes caused by uncertainty and the influence of external and internal environment factors. In this article the program planning system based on genetic algorithms and program options was designed. The whole process of system operation and it’s elements were considered. The advantages of planning system using in relation to the oil and gas field modernization program were analyzed. The proposed system meets the requirements of program managers to planning tools and methods and allows managers to create flexible plans that involve pre-designed steps when changes occur.
program management, program planning, planning system, program plan development, genetic algorithms.
Введение
Планирование программы влияет на функционирование компаний в целом. От качества планирования программ зависит не только достижение цели, но и выгоды, которые получит реализующая ее компания — положение на рынке, финансовое состояние, устойчивость, привлечение новых клиентов, расширение производства, выход на новые рынки и т.п. Рыночные условия функционирования современных компаний определяют и среду выполнения программ, которая характеризуется высокой скоростью изменений. Таким образом, менеджеры программ должны отслеживать изменения и выстраивать свою деятельность в соответствии с ними. Отсюда вытекает требование к инструментам и методам планирования программы и управления — помощь менеджеру в создании гибкого расписания, т.е. расписания, включающего возможности предусмотрения рисковых ситуаций, связанных с изменениями внешней и внутренней сред, и подготовки к ним [1; 6; 9].
1. Makeeva O.Y. Kluchevye osobennosti realizatsii I planirovaniya programmy [Key points in program planning and realization]. Rossiysky zurnal upravleniya proektami [Russian journal of project management]. 2014, I. 3, pp. 35–45.
2. Makeeva O.Y. Optsiony kak sredstvo dostizeniya gybkosti pri planirovanii programmmy [Options as a method of program planning flexibility achievement]. Problemy teorii I praktiki upravleniya [Management theory and practice problems]. 2016, I. 2, pp. 119–125.
3. Makeeva O.Y. Razrabotka sistemnogo podkhoda k planirovaniyu programmy. [Development of system approach to program planning]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya [Management theory and practice problems]. 2015, I. 5, pp. 135–141.
4. Makeeva O.Y., Tsarkov I.N. Sistemny podkhod k upravleniyu effektivnostyu proekta na osnove geneticheskikh algoritmov [System approach to project effectiveness management based on genetic algorithms]. Rossiysky zurnal upravleniya proektami [Russian journal of project management]. 2012, I. 1, pp. 14–30.
5. A Guidebook of Project and Program Management for Enterprise Innovation. Volume 1&2. Project Management Association of Japan.
6. Ferns D.C. Developments in programme management. International Journal of Project Management. 1991. V. 9. № 3. Р. 148–156.
7. Forrest S. Genetic algorithms: Principles of natural selection applied to computation. Science. 1993. № 261. Р. 872–878.
8. Byrne J.J. Polaris: lessons in risk management. Multi-Media Publications Inc., Oshawa, Ontario: 2011. P. 216.
9. Gareis R. Management of the Project-Oriented Company. In The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects, Eds Peter W G Morris & Jeffrey K Pinto, Hoboken, NJ; John Wiley & Sons. Chapter 6, pp 123–143, 2004.
10. Hartmann S. Project scheduling with multiple modes: a genetic algorithm, Annals of Operations Research 102: 111–135, 2001.
11. McCawley P.F. The logic model for program planning and evaluation. University of Idaho Extension. P.:1-5, 1997.
12. Mori M., Tseng C.C. A genetic algorithm for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research. 1997. № 100. P. 134–141.
13. The Standard for Program Management. Second Edition, Project Management Institute. P.: 324.
