ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RESTRUCTURING OF RUSSIAN HIGH-TECH INDUSTRY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT MARKET POWER FACTOR
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
In the transition from full-cycle production of complex products and all their major components in every enterprise to network organization of production with the release of specialized production for each component a number of problems arise. In particular, isolated - certainly few - specialized suppliers acquire significant market power on the component market issued by them. Caused by this increase in selling prices of purchased components may exceed the savings achieved through the reduction of production cost components at specialized enterprises. In this paper, based on the author´s model of bilateral oligopoly as a closed queuing system evaluated oligopolistic surcharge to the price component. The method proposed makes it possible to assess the effectiveness of the transition from full-cycle production of complex products in each enterprise to the network structure of the industry, taking into account the impact of market power of the components suppliers.

Keywords:
the network structure of the industry, bilateral oligopoly, queuing theory, price formation, the market power of the suppliers, the criterion of optimal organizational structure of the industry.
References

1. ​ Baybakova E.Yu., Klochkov V.V. Ekonomicheskie aspekty formirovaniya setevykh organizatsionnykh struktur v rossiyskoy naukoemkoy promyshlennosti. UBS. – 2010. – Vyp. 30.1. – S. 697–721.

2. ​ Baybakova E.Yu., Klochkov V.V. Analiz problem i riskov restrukturizatsii aviapromyshlennogo kompleksa Rossii. Natsional´nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost´. – 2013. – № 4 (193). – S. 7–17.

3. ​ Baybakova E.Yu., Klochkov V.V. Ekonomicheskie aspekty fragmentatsii tekhnologicheskikh tsepochek v naukoemkoy promyshlennosti. Vestnik UGTU. – 2010. – № 6. – S. 89–101.

4. ​ Klochkov V.V., Selezneva I.E. Konkurentnye mekhanizmy snizheniya zatrat v rossiyskoy oboronnoy promyshlennosti: effektivnost´ i riski. Natsional´nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost´. – 2015. – Vyp. 45. – S. 2–17.

5. ​ Takha Kh. Vvedenie v issledovanie operatsiy. – 6-e izd. – M.: Vil´yams, 2001. – 916 s.

6. ​ Gusmanov T.M., Klochkov V.V. Ekonomicheskie problemy razvitiya aviatsionnoy promyshlennosti v usloviyakh nestabil´nogo sprosa na aviaperevozki. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. – 2008. – № 3. – S. 98–109.

7. ​ Klochkov V.V. Ekonomika: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. – M.: INFRA-M, 2012. – 684 s.

8. ​ Kolesnik G.V. Analiz vertikal´nykh effektov konkurentsii firm na ierarkhicheskikh rynkakh. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 25–38.

9. ​ Rubinstein A. Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica. 1982. Vol. 50. P. 97-109.

10. ​ Collard-Wexler A., Gowrisankaran G., Lee R.S. Bargaining in bilateral oligopoly: an alternating offers’ representation of the “Nash-in-Nash solution”. NBER working paper series. WP 20641. 2014. 47 p.

11. ​ Dickson A., Hartley R. Bilateral oligopoly and quantity competition. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. Discussion papers on economics. №. 09-22. 2009. 28 p.

12. ​ Benkard C.L. A Dynamic analysis of the market for widebodied commercial aircraft. Review of economic studies. 2004. Vol. 71. № 3. P. 581–611.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?