The problem of communication is considered as a phenomenon existing in the context of the interrelationship between the similarities and differences. The differences are connected with legitimation of interest in the subject of communication practices within the socio-cultural society (the similarities). It is revealed that the communication society culture exists as a unity of closely interrelated aspects — subjective and personal. The need for approval of the communicative model of personality as a multicultural entity creates prerequisites for radical changes in life strategy, the key points that make up the skills to be included in the growing complexity of communication networks, including the ability to create a new system of relationships (self-organization). All this does not only make the differences in culture explicit, but also stimulates the next stage of the socio-cultural development. It is concluded that the position of the subject, which has new communicative consciousness, may be changed. The basis for the mechanism of personal comprehension of the world is an innovative activity of the multicultural subject.
communication, subject, culture, modern society, socio-cultural relations, innovative activities.
Современное общество маркировано интенсивностью коммуникаций как важной характеристикой своего существования и развития. Одной из движущих сил этих процессов выступает инновационная деятельность, релевантная институциональной информационной реальности.
1. Berlyand I.E. Ot sostaviteley [From the drafters]. Zamysly V 2 kn. Kn. 1 [The designs. In 2 v, v. 1]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2002, pp. 3–11.
2. Bibler V.S. Myshlenie kak tvorchestvo. (Vvedenie v logiku myslen¬nogo dialoga) [Thinking as creativity. (Introduction to the logic of mental dialogue)]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1975. 400 p.
3. Lektorskiy V.A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassiches¬kaya [Epistemology classical and nonclassical]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2001. 256 p.
4. Ryabova M.E. Poliyazychie kak preodolenie uslozhneniya mira [Multilinguism as overcoming the complexity of the world]. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy]. 2010, I. 7, pp. 149–152.
5. Ryabova M.E. Sotsial’no-filosofskoe osmyslenie dinamiki sotsiokul’turnykh protsessov v kontekste tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiya [Socio-philosophical understanding of the dynamics of socio-cultural processes in the context of civilizational de¬velopment]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Gumanitarnye nauki [Proceedings of the higher edu¬cational institutions. Volga region. Humanitarian sciences]. 2009, I. 1, pp. 3–12.
6. Sychev A.A. Filosofsko-metodologicheskie osnovaniya inte¬grativnogo podkhoda [Philosophical and methodological foun¬dations integrative approach]. Regionologiya [Regionology]. 2013, I. 4, pp. 99–102.
7. Toffler E. Shok budushchego [Future Shock]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2002. 557 p.
8. Dance F.E.X. The Concept of Communication // Journal of Communication, 1970. Vol. 20. P. 201–210.
9. Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handels. Bd. 2. Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft — Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 1981. — 632 S.
10. Parsons T., Shils E. Toward a general theory of action. N.Y.: Harper, 1951. 506 r.
