Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Voronezh, Voronezh, Russian Federation
The article presents theoretical aspects of comprehensive evaluation of woody plantings on the territory of the settlements as ecological and social capital. Attention is focused on the need for legitimate responsibility of the municipality to communities for preserving and enhancing the ecological values of tree and shrub plantings on the residential sections of urban areas. For this methodological paradigm for the calculation of the cadastral value of green spaces in the municipal land of settlements shall include the need to strengthen the spectrum of legal protection of the values of the multifunctional beneficial properties. Unlike current practice, which includes only consumer properties of the material constituents of wood plantings, it is proposed to apply an integrated approach to the calculation of the cadastral value of public "green" capital, resulting in a significantly increase of its value. This will reduce the interest of developers in making close the objects of capital construction by clearing underbrush and ripening of wood plantings in the territory of municipal formations. Ecological value of stands and individual trees is considered as a basis for measuring the economic damage in the event of causing harm to them for any reason. As a tool for dynamic evaluation of the value of environmental assets, the authors propose to create models on the basis of modern methods of knowledge for making management decisions in the management system of prudent consumption and reproduction quality of the surrounding natural habitat in residential areas. The need for legal regulation of environmental security and measures for maintenance of standards of environmental status on land settlements authorities in the municipal boundaries is underlined. In this paper we propose a method of solving the problem of measuring the value of "green spaces" through the establishment of conceptual bases of definition of innovation standards for the use of methods of experimental studies of consumer properties of environmental assets. This problem is subject to further economic research, and is one of the urgent tasks of municipal economy.
wood plantings, assessment of use value, lands of settlements, environment
Введение
Зелёные насаждения на территории земель населённых пунктов, кроме видеоэстетических качеств, обладают экологическими благами – совокупностью потребительских свойств древесных и не древесных материальных ресурсов, а также их полезных функций, которые особо необходимы людям на густо населённых селитебных территориях.
1. Federal'nye standarty ocenki: FSO 1 - 6: FSO 1. Obshhie ponjatija ocenki, podhody i trebovanija k provedeniju ocenki: utv. prikazom Minjekonomrazvitija RF ot 20 ijulja 2007g. № 256; FSO 2. Cel' ocenki i vidy stoimosti: to zhe № 255; FSO 3. Trebovanija k otchjotu: to zhe № 254; FSO 4. Opredelenie kadastrovoj stoimosti ob#ektov nedviz himosti: to zhe ot 22 oktjabrja 2010 g. № 508; FSO 5. Vidy jekspertizy, porjadok ejo provedenija, trebovanija k jekspertnomu zakljucheniju i porjadku ego utverzhdenija (FSO № 5): to zhe ot 04 ijulja 2011g. № 328; FSO 6. Trebovanija k urovnju znanij jeksperta samoregulirujushhej organizacii (FSO № 6): to zhe ot 07 nojabrja 2011g. № 628. [The Federal valuation standards: FSO 1 - 6: 1 FSO. General concepts of evaluation, approaches and requirements to the evaluation: approved by order of the RF Ministry of economic development of 20 July 2007. No. 256; FSO 2. The purpose of valuation and types of value: the same as No. 255; FSO 3. Report requirements: the same as No. 254; FSO 4. The definition of the cadastral value of real estate: as of October 22, 2010 № 508; FSO 5. The types of examination, procedure, requirements to the expert opinion and the procedure of its approval (FVS No. 5): the same July 04, 2011. No. 328; FSO 6. Requirements to the level of expert knowledge-regulatory organization (FSO No. 6): the same Nov 07, 2011. No. 628.] (In Russian).
2. «Ob ohrane okruzhajushhej sredy» [«On environmental protection»]: federal'nyj zakon ot 10.01.2002g. № 7- FZ [Federal law of 10.01.2002 № 7-FZ]. (In Russian).
3. Berestov V. L., Kuznetsov S. G., Konchakova S. A. Problemy teorii i praktiki lesnogo planirovanija [Theory and practice of forest planning] Lesnoj kompleks: sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija: mezhdunar. nauch.-tehn. konf [Forestry: status and prospects: Intern. Scientific.-tech. Conf]. Bryansk, 2008, pp. 68-72. (In Russian).
4. Bobylev S. N., Zakharov V. M. «Zeljonaja» jekonomika i modernizacija jekologo-jekonomicheskihosnov ustojchivogo razvitija ["Green" economy and modernization of the environmental and economic pillars of sustainable development] Na puti k ustojchivomu razvitiju Rossii: bjulleten' [Towardsto sustainable development of Russia: Bulletin]. 2012, no. 60 (In Russian).
5. Gordeev Y. A., Kulagin A. A. Vlijanie zeljonyh nasazhdenij na shumovuju harakteristiku urbanizirovannyh territorij [Influence of green plants on noise characteristics of the urbanized territories] Izvestija Orenburgskogo gos. agrarn. un-ta [Proceeds of Orenburg state agrarian Univ]. Orenburg, 2014, no. 2(46), pp. 151-155. (In Russian).
6. Ibatullin W. G., Anduganov Y. Y. Jandyganov, Ja.Ja. Jekologicheskij menedzhment v municipal'nom upravlenii [Environmental management in municipal management] Ufa, 2005, 164 p. (In Russian).
7. Palamarchuk, M. Distancionnoe zondirovanie lesa [Remote sensing of forests] Internet GEO, 2014, no. 2, pp. 68-72. (In Russian).
8. Preshkin G. A. Zatratnyj podhod k ocenke lesnyh blag [Cost approach to valuation of forest goods] Vestnik Mosk. gos. un-ta lesa – Lesnoj vestnik [Vestnik Mosk. state forest University] 2010, no. 5(74), pp. 203-208. (In Russian).
9. Preshkin G. A. Normativy ocenki lesnyh blag: problemy, reshenija [Normal for valuation of forest wealth: problems and solutions]. Ekaterinburg, 2011, 319 p. (In Russian).
10. Tatarkin A. I., Krivorotov V. V., Belik I. S.. [at all] Problemy ustojchivogo razvitija social'nojekonomicheskih system [Problems of sustainable development of socio-economic systems] Moscow, 2012, 555 p. (In Russian).
11. Anduganov Y. Ya., Vlasova E. Ya., Polyakova L. A., Preshkin G. A. Rekreacionnyj potencial urbanizirovannoj territorii [The recreational potential of the urban territory] Ekaterinburg, 2013, 444 p. (In Russian).
12. Sanaev I. V. Rol' zeljonyh nasazhdenij v sozdanii optimal'noj gorodskoj sredy [Role of green spaces in creating an optimal urban environment] Vestnik Mosk. gos. un-ta lesa – Lesnoj vestnik [Vestnik Mosk. state University of forest – Forest vestnik]. 2006, no. 6, pp. 71-76. (In Russian).
13. Severskiy S. I., Malysheva N.B., Pyankov I.B. Problemy vnedrenija informacionno-kommunikacionnyh tehnologij v lesnoe hozjajstvo i kompleksnye reshenija [Problems of implementation of information and communication technologies in forestry and integrated solutions] Vestnik Mosk. gos. un-ta lesa – Lesnoj vestnik [Vestnik Mosk. state University of forest – Forest vestnik]. 2015, no. 2, pp. 144-158. (In Russian).
14. Soldatov A.V., Preshkin G.A. Metodologia delle norme sulla fisclita e valove dei uscita assortimento accessibilita technologica delle materie prime di ligno inoggetti di gestione forestale Italian Science Review, 2016; 1(34). pp. 98-103 URL: http://www.ias-journal. org/archive/2016/Preshkin.pdf
15. Geltner D. On the Use of the financial Option Price Model to Value and Explain Vacant Urban Land J. of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Associations. USA, 1989, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 142-158.
16. Cadogan A., Tony Johnson Measuring the Green Economy. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2011, 18 p.
17. Fuerst F., Patrick McAllister Green Noise or Green Value? Measuring the Effects of Environmental Certification on Office Values. Real estate economics, 2011, Vol. 39 1, pp. 45–69.
18. Foster J., Ashley Lowe, Steve Winkelman The value of green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation The Center for Clean Air Policy, 2011, 52 p.
19. Naumann S., McKenna Davis, Timo Kaphengst, Mav Pieterse and Matt Rayment Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects. 2011, 138 p.
