Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Sankt-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
The article deals with the interrelation of forest canopy of trees and high-rise structures of spruce undergrowth of different phenological forms in pleurocarpous moss group of forest type in conditions of Leningrad region. The analysis of high-rise structures of different phenological forms depending on the composition and structure of forest in the most represented types of forests in Leningrad region is made. For further insights on the role of composition and structure of forest stand as factors determining high-rise structure of different phenological forms of undergrowth of spruce, analysis of variance was conducted. Decrease in the share of large height spruce undergrowth of all phenological forms in the increase of participation of spruce in the growing stock, with increasing elative completeness of forest stand, its age and stock, allowed to conclude that the structure of natural regeneration of spruce on height is affected by the degree of illumination under the canopy of forest stand. Analysis of altitudinal structure of spruce undergrowth in different phenological forms in height, depending on forest type showed that proportion of the undergrowth of all phenological forms is higher in dry forest types than in wet forest. From this we can conclude that high-rise structure of spruce undergrowth in different phenological forms is influenced not only by illuminance under the canopy of the forest, but also fertility of soil, its physical and chemical properties. Conducted analysis of variance confirmed statistically significant dependence of this factor. As a result of conducted research it can be concluded, that in conditions of middle taiga of all biocenotic factors factors, forest type and composition of stands have greater influence on high-rise structure of phenological forms of spruce undergrowth.
natural regeneration of spruce; phenological forms of spruce undergrowth; structure of spruce undergrowth in different phenological forms in height.
Введение. У ели есть множество морфологических, фенологических и иных форм [10, 29, 31]. Выделение этих форм имеет важное лесохозяйственное и селекционное значение [11, 16]. Методика выделения фенологических форм различна у разных исследователей [4]. В своих исследованиях для выделения фенологических форм мы использовали методику А.В. Грязькина [8].
Единого мнения по вопросу обусловленности фенологической структуры подроста ели нет. Одни авторы считают это генетической обусловленностью [7, 26, 27, 28, 30, 32, 33]. Другие – влиянием внешних условий [2, 21, 24].
1. Akakiev, F.I. Nekotorye biologicheskie osobennosti i lesohozjajstvennoe znachenie fenologicheskih form eli [Some biological characteristics and forestry value of phenological forms spruce]: avtoref. dis. … k.c.-h. nauk / Fedor Ivanovich Akakiev. – L., 1960. – 16 s.
2. Alekseev, V.I. Nekotorye voprosy sezonnogo rosta i razvitija podrosta eli [Some of the issues of seasonal growth and development of young growth of spruce] / V.I. Alekseev // Sezonnoe razvitie prirody Evropejskoj chasti SSSR. – Moskva, 1974. – S. 32-33.
3. Belyaeva, N.V. Zakonomernosti izmeneniya struktury i sostoyaniya molodogo poko-leniya eli v usloviyakh intensivnogo khozyaystvennogo vozdeystviya [The regularity of change structure and state of vitality younger generation spruce under the conditions intense economic influence]: avtoref. dis. …d-ra. c.-kh. nauk / N.V. Belyaeva. – SPb.: SPbGLTU, 2013. – 43 p.
4. Veveris A.L. O metodike vydelenija rano- i pozdnoraspuskajushhihsja elej [About recovery mechanism of early- and late blooming phenological forms spruce] / A.L. Veveris. – Lesovedenie, №2. – M.: Izd-vo «Nauka», 1969. – S.83-84.
5. Volovich, P.I. Sootnoshenie eli po sostavu fenologicheskih form i ispol'zovanie luchshih klimatipov v lesokul'turnoj praktike Belorusskoj SSR [The proportion spruce for composition of phenological forms and the use best climatypes in the silvicultural practice of the Belarus SSR] / P.I. Volovich // Intensifikacija lesnogo hozjajstva v BSSR. –Minsk., 1978. – S.79-88.
6. Gabrilavichus, R.B. Rano- i pozdnoraspuskajushhajasja el' v lesah Litovskoj SSR [The early- and late blooming spruce in forest Lithuania SSR] / R.B. Gabrilavichus // Tr. Litovsk. NII lesn. hoz-va. – Riga, 1977. – Vyp. 17. – S. 118-121.
7. Golikov A.M. Rost i formovaja struktura potomstva eli evropejskoj v zavisimosti ot geterozigotnosti derev'ev i uslovij proizrastanija [The growth and formed structure common spruce depending on heterozygosis trees in growth conditions] // Lesovedenie. – 2007. - №4. - S.51-58.
8. Grjaz'kin, A.V. Struktura fenologicheskih form molodogo pokolenija eli v uslovijah Leningradskoj oblasti [The Structure of Phenological Forms of the Young Generation Spruce in the Leningrad Region] / A.V. Grjaz'kin, N.V. Beljaeva // Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij «Lesnoj zhurnal», 2013. – № 2. – g. Arhangel'sk: FGAOU VPO «Severnyj (Arkticheskij) federal'nyj universitet imeni M.V. Lomonosova». – S. 84-92.
9. Kazakov V.I. Osobennosti sozdanija i rosta kul'tur eli na vyrubkah s vlazhnymi i vremenno pereuvlazhnennymi pochvami [Features of creation and growth of spruce species in clearings with wet and temporarily waterlogged soils] / V.I. Kazakov, N.E. Prokazin, E.N. Loba-nova // Lesotehnicheskij zhurnal № 1 (9) – Voronezh, 2013. – S. 32-42.
10. Krasnobaeva, S.Ju. Luchshie klimatipy eli obyknovennoj v geograficheskih kul'turah v respublike Tatarstan [Top climatypes of common spruce in provenance in the Republic of Tatarstan] / S.Ju. Krasnobaeva // Lesotehnicheskij zhurnal № 2 (10) – Voronezh, 2013. – S. 31-37.
11. Makarov Ju.I. Vnutrividovoj i vozrastnoj polimorfizm eli evropejskoj (Picea abies (L.) Karst) v uslovijah Vologodskoj oblasti [Intraspecies and age polymorphism of Norway spruce (Picea Abies (L.) Karst.) in conditions of the Vologda region]/ Ju.I. Makarov, F.N. Druzhinin // Lesotehnicheskij zhurnal № 4 (12) – Voronezh, 2013. – S. 24-32.
12. Martynov, A.N. Estestvennoe vozobnovlenie lesa: tekst lekcij [The forest reproduction: the text of the lectures] / A.N. Martynov, S.N. Sennov, A.V. Grjaz'kin. – SPb: SPbLTA, 1994. – 42 s.
13. Mel'nik, P.G. Osobennosti sezonnogo rosta jekotipov eli v uslovijah Sol-nechnogorskogo opytnogo leshoza [The features of the seasonal growth of spruce ecotypes in conditions of Solnechnogorsk experimental forestry] / P.G Mel'nik, S.M. Savostin // Nauchnye trudy: Lesopol'zovanie i vosproizvodstvo lesnyh resursov. – Vyp. 280. – M.: Izd-vo MGUL, 1995. – S. 62-63.
14. Milenin A.I. Osveshhennost' i estestvennoe vozobnovlenie eli evropejskoj v zone lesov Klinsko-Dmitrovskoj vozvyshennosti [Illumination and natural renewal of spruce forests in the area of the Klin-Dmitrov hills forests] / A.I. Milenin, A.I. Arbuzov // Lesotehnicheskij zhurnal № 3 – Voronezh, 2011. – S. 58-61.
15. Miljutin, L.I. Formy eli Brjanskoj oblasti, ih lesovodstvennoe i hozjajstvennoe znachenie [The spruce forms in Bryansk region and their silvicultural and economic value] : avtoref. dis. … k.s.-h. nauk / Leonid Iosifovich Miljutin. – Krasno-jarsk, 1963. – S. 20.
16. Morozov, G.P. Fenotipicheskaja struktura eli [The phenotypic structure of spruce] / G.P. Morozov // Korennye temnohvojnye lesa juzhnoj tajgi (rezervat Kologrivskij les). – M.: Nauka, 1988. – S.162-175.
17. Pal'cev, A.M. Sezonnyj rost geograficheskih kul'tur eli obyknovennoj v Moskovskoj oblasti [The seasonal growth of geographical cultures of norway spruce in the Moscow region] / A.M. Pal'cev // Lesovedenie, 1980. – №6. – S. 11-18.
18. Popov, V.Ja. Rost i razvitie form eli na plantacii semennogo proishozhdenija [The growth and development of spruce forms on the plantations of seed origin] / V.Ja. Popov, P.V. Tuchin, M.V. Surso, A.A. Vasil'ev // Otchet. godich. ses. po itogam nauch.-issled. rabot za 1984 god. – Arhangel'sk: Izd-vo AILILH, 1985. – S. 31-32.
19. Red'ko, G.I. Geograficheskie kul'tury eli: lekcija [The geographical spruce cultures: lecture] / G.I.Red'ko, A.D.Dursin. – L.: LTA, 1982. – S.34-36.
20. Ronis, Je.Ja. O nekotoryh formah eli obyknovennoj v lesah Latvijskoj SSR [About some forms of norway spruce in forests Latvia SSR] / Je.Ja. Ronis, A.L. Veveris // Issledovanija o prirode drevesnyh porod. – Riga: Izdatel'stvo AN LatSSR, 1964. – S. 5-20.
21. Tarhanov, S.N. Fenologicheskie formy v geograficheskih kul'turah eli v Komi ASSR [The phenological forms in geographical spruce cultures in Komi ASSR] / S.N. Tarhanov // Voprosy iskusstvennogo lesovosstanovlenija na Evropejskom Severe. – Arhangel'sk: AILH, 1986. – S.73-80.
22. Terent'ev V.I. Nekotorye osobennosti fenologicheskih form eli sibirskoj (Picea obovata Ledeb.) v Srednej Sibiri [The some features of phenological forms siberian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) in middle Siberia] / V.I. Terent'ev, L.I. Miljutin // Botanicheskie issledovanija v Sibiri. – Vypusk 8. – Krasnojarsk: Krasnojarskoe otdelenie Rossijskogo botanicheskogo obshhestva RAN, 2000. – S. 113- 116.
23. Haritonov, G.A. Razvitie rano- i pozdnoraspuskajushhihsja ras Picea excelsa v svjazi s uslovijami mestoproizrastanija [The development of early- and late blooming race Picea excelsa depending of growth conditions] / A.G. Haritonov. – Sovetskaja botanika, 1937. – № 4. – S. 90-95.
24. Barton, B.M. Variation in the phenology of bud flushing in white and red spruce / B.M. Barton // Can. J. Forest Res, 1988. 18. – №3. – p. 315-319.
25. Birot, Y. Genetic structures and expected genetic gains from multitraitselection in wild populations of Donalas fir and Sitka spruce. 1. Genetic variation between and within popu-lations / Y. Birot, C. Christophe // Silvae genet, 1983. – V. 32, № 5-6. – P. 141-151.
26. Bouvarel, P. Variabilité de l'épicéa (Picea excelsa Link) dans le Jura français: répartition et caractères des divers types / P. Bouvarel. – Rev. for. franc., 1954, 6 (2): 85-98.
27. Holzer, K. Die Abhangigkeit des Fiechtenaustriebes vom Fruhjahrsklima / K.Holzer, U. Schultze // Osterr. Forstztg, 1988. 99. 5. – S.59-60.
28. Lindquist, B. Geneties in Swedish Forestry Practice / B. Lindquist. – Stockholm: Svenska Skogsvardsforeningens forlag, 1948. – 173 p.
29. Münch, E. Die Knospenentfaltung der Fichte und Spätfrostgefahr / E. Münch. – Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 1923, H 11. – S. 241-265.
30. Purkyne, E. Uber zwei in Mitteleuropa wachsende Fichtenformen / E. Purkyne // Forst- und Jagdwesen, 1877. – Bd. 14. – H. 23. – S. 69-78.
31. Rohmeder, E. Der jahreszeitliche Verlauf des Höhenwachstums früh- und spättrei-bender Fichten / E. Rohmeder. – Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 1952. – H 11/12. – P. 368-372.
32. Rühl, A. Vorläufige Mittelung über das Auftreten rot- und grünzapfiger Fichten in Estland / A. Rühl. – Tartu Ülikooli metsaosakonna toimetused, 1928. – nr. 12.
33. Schmidt, E. Die Reliktföhrenwälder der Alpen / E. Schmidt. – Beitr. 2. Geobot. Landesaufn. d. Schweiz, Bd. XXI, Bern, 1936 . – 190 s.
