employee
, Russian Federation
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
The paper features the problem of the qualification standard for court representatives introduced into the Civil Procedure Code and the Arbitration Procedure of the Russian Federation. The current legislation that regulates relations in the field of higher education allows for a broader interpretation of the concept of “person with higher education”. In this regard, not every person with a higher legal education will be able to provide a qualitative representation in court. It may interfere with the right to qualified legal assistance and does not improve the quality of such assistance. The authors do not approve of the fact that the figure of attorney was excluded from the final text of the law, as well as the impossibility of joint representation of the party’s interests by several persons, including those without higher legal education, provided that at least one of them has the necessary education. The authors highlight various separate procedural problems associated with the non-uniform character of the requirements for representatives depending on the type of court. These problems are also found in the implementation of another institute introduced by the Federal Law of November 28, 2018, No. 451-FZ – namely, reference of jurisdiction.
procedural revolution, educational qualification of a representative, higher legal education, legal representation, accessibility of Justice, professional legal proceedings
1. Novak D. V. Zadacha koncepcii – sozdat' stimuly dlya ob'edineniya uchastnikov rynka professional'noy yuridicheskoy pomoschi // Zakon. 2017. № 11. S. 6–19.
2. Tay Yu. V. Reforma rynka yuridicheskih uslug. Prinyat' neizbezhnoe // Zakon. 2017. № 11. S. 38–54.
3. Kozlova E. B. Sovremennye zakonodatel'nye iniciativy v sfere professional'nogo predstavitel'stva v grazhdanskom processe v svete principa besprepyatstvennogo dostupa k pravosudiyu // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2018. № 8. S. 24–30.
4. Popova D. G. Professional'noe sudebnoe predstavitel'stvo: sostoyanie i perspektivy // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i obschestvennye nauki. 2018. № 4. S. 84–91.
5. Momotov V. V. Sovershenstvovanie sudebnogo predstavitel'stva: sovremennyy vzglyad // Evraziyskaya advokatura. 2018. № 3. S. 29–37.
6. Solov'ev A. A. Vysshee yuridicheskoe obrazovanie kak obyazatel'noe kvalifikacionnoe trebovanie k sudebnym predstavitelyam // Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga. 2015. № 3. S. 98–105.
7. Malov A. A. Trebovaniya k vysshemu yuridicheskomu obrazovaniyu predstaviteley v arbitrazhnom processe. Neobhodimost' ili sootvetstvie tendencii sovremennogo sudoproizvodstva // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process. 2017. № 12. S. 19–21.
8. Osipov G. V., Savinkov V. I. Dinamika aspirantury i perspektivy do 2030 goda: statisticheskiy i sociologicheskiy analiz. M.: CSP i M, 2014. 152 s.
9. Yarkov V. V. Proekt processual'noy reformy: quo vadis? // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process. 2017. № 12. S. 10–14.
10. Novak D. V. The task of the concept is to create incentives for the unification of professional legal aid market participants. Zakon, 2017, (11): 6–19. (In Russ.)
11. Tay Yu. V. Accepting the inevitable: legal services market reform. Zakon, 2017, (11): 38–54. (In Russ.)
12. Kozlova E. B. Modern legislative initiatives in the field of professional representation in the civil process in the light of the principle of unhindered access to justice. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2018, (8): 24–30. (In Russ.)
13. Popova D. G. Professional judicial representation: current situation and prospects. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 2018, (4): 84–91. (In Russ.)
14. Momotov V. V. Improving of judicial representation: modern view. Eurasian advocacy, 2018, (3): 29–37. (In Russ.)
15. Soloviev A. A. Higher legal education as a mandatory qualification requirement for legal representatives. Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga, 2015, (3): 98–105. (In Russ.)
16. Malov A. A. Requirements to higher legal education of representatives in an arbitral procedure. Necessity or following the modern proceedings tendency. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess, 2017, (12): 19–21. (In Russ.)
17. Osipov G. V., Savinkov V. I. Dynamics of postgraduate studies and prospects until 2030: statistical and sociological analysis. Moscow: CSP i M, 2014, 152. (In Russ.)
18. Yarkov V. V. Procedural reform project: quo vadis? Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess, 2017, (12): 10–14. (In Russ.)
