Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Engineering practice cannot and will never be successful without spatial imagination and thinking, deep knowledge of geometric methods and ways for solution of engineering problems, comprehensive understanding of specificity and geometric features of technical objects and their images, understanding of labor organization impact on these processes etc. In this paper has been described the social and pedagogical investigation of question related to students’ substantive readiness to study higher educational institution’s graphic disciplines, and this question’s basis is contradiction between requirements to the initial level of students’ knowledge and skills and the level of students’ substantive readiness on the course of school training. In this paper have been performed analysis and generalization of existing pedagogical experience on issues related to graphic training. A method and a scheme for monitoring the degree of students’ competence on the school geometry course using Google forms have been proposed. Selective testing of students by the proposed way has been performed. Statistical processing of data obtained during this testing has been carried out, the density function of correct responses has been built, field of testing results correlation with total score of Unified State Exam (USE) results has been carried out, cluster analysis of obtained results has been performed by Varda method. Using the theory of latent variables and the Rush model an analysis of test tasks, aimed at optimizing the test structure, has been carried out. Based on the performed investigation, recommendations have been given for further research in this field, and measures are proposed on changing the learning process aimed at personalizing and building an individual learning trajectory in order to increase the educational process’s efficiency.
geometric and graphic training, substantive readiness, school training, online testing, Rush model
1. Abrosimov S.N., Tihonov-Bugrov D.E., Glazunov K.O. Geometro-graficheskie studencheskie olimpiady v Sankt-Peterburge [Geometric graphic student olympiads in St. Petersburg]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2019, V. 7, I. 2, pp. 76–86. DOI: 10.12737/article_5d2c350baf0b28.40160405. (in Russian)
2. Atroshkina A.A., Komp'yuternoe testirovanie kak sredstvo obucheniya i kontrolya v informacionno-obrazovatel'noj srede vuza [Computer testing as a means of training and control in the information and educational environment of the university]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University]. 2015, I. 12 (165), pp. 104–108. (in Russian)
3. Bojkov A.A. O postroenii modelej ob"ektov prostranstva chetyrekh i bolee izmerenij v uchebnom processe [On the construction of models of objects of space of four or more dimensions in the educational process]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2018, V. 6, I. 4, pp. 54–71. DOI: 10.12737/article_5c21f96dce5de8.36096061. (in Russian)
4. Voloshinov D.V. O perspektivah razvitiya geometrii i ee instrumentariya [On the prospects for the development of geometry and its tools]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2014, V. 2, I. 1, pp. 15–21. DOI: 10.12737/3844. (in Russian)
5. Vol'hin K.A. Problemy graficheskoj podgotovki studentov tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Problems of graphic preparation of students of a technical university]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2014, V. 2, I. 3, pp. 25–30. – DOI: 10.12737/6222. (in Russian)
6. Gladkova L.A. Ispol'zovanie sovremennyh informacionnyh tekhnologij obucheniya v vuzah III-IV urovnya akkreditacii [The use of modern information technologies of training in universities of the III-IV level of accreditation]. Informacionnye tekhnologii i sredstva obucheniya [Information technologies and teaching aids]. 2010, I. 3, pp. 8–12. (in Russian)
7. Glass Dzh. Statisticheskie metody v pedagogike i psihologii [Statistical methods in pedagogy and psychology]. Moscow: Mir Publ., 1976. 145 p. (in Russian)
8. Golovkina V.B., Trenazhernyj kompleks kak instrument razvitiya tvorcheskogo potenciala i navykov trekhmernogo komp'yuternogo modelirovaniya u uchashchihsya [Training complex as a tool for the development of creative potential and skills of three-dimensional computer modeling in students]. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya [Higher education today]. 2015, I. 12, pp. 27–30. (in Russian)
9. Kayukova I.V. Razrabotka matematicheskih metodov i modelej analiza i prognozirovaniya kachestva obucheniya v vuze na osnove kompetentnosnogo podhoda. Kand. Diss [Development of mathematical methods and models for analyzing and forecasting the quality of education at a university based on a competent approach. Cand. Diss]. Volgograd, 2014. 137 p. (in Russian)
10. Kostryukov A.V. Problemy kachestva dovuzovskoj geometro-graficheskoj podgotovki [Quality problems of pre-university geometric-graphic preparation]. Universitetskij kompleks kak regional'nyj centr obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-metodicheskoj konferencii [University complex as a regional center of education, science and culture. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Methodological Conference]. 2017, pp. 783–786. (in Russian)
11. Lagunova M.V. K voprosu ob urovne gotovnosti studentov 1 kursa k osvoeniyu geometro-graficheskih disciplin v vuze [To the question of the level of readiness of first-year students to master geometric-graphic disciplines at the university]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki: tradicii i innovacii [Problems of the quality of graphic preparation: traditions and innovations]. 2015, pp. 236–242. Available at: http://dgng.pstu.ru/conf2015/papers/27/(in Russian)
12. Mokrecova L.O. Osobennosti podgotovki shkol'nikov k predprofessional'nomu ekzamenu po profilyu «Konstruktorskoe proektirovanie» [Peculiarities of preparing schoolchildren for the preprofessional exam on the profile “Design Engineering”]. Sovremennoe obrazovanie: soderzhanie, tekhnologii, kachestvo [Modern education: content, technology, quality]. 2018, V. 1, pp. 220–222. (in Russian)
13. Nazarov A.I. Preimushchestva distancionnyh obrazovatel'nyh tekhnologij – vzglyady studentov i prepodavatelej [The advantages of distance learning technologies are the views of students and teachers]. Otkrytoe obrazovanie [Open education]. 2016, I. 6, pp. 42–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2016-6. (in Russian)
14. Polikarpov Yu.V. Soderzhanie vuzovskogo kursa nachertatel'noj geometrii v epohu tret'ej promyshlennoj revolyucii [The content of the university course in descriptive geometry in the era of the third industrial revolution]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2018, V. 6, I. 3, pp. 49–55. DOI: 10.12737/article_5bc453447db654.91666264. (in Russian)
15. Pripadchev A.A. Opyt ispol'zovaniya avtomatizirovannoj sistemy testirovaniya v uchebnom processe (na primere prepodavaniya discipliny pravo) [The experience of using an automated testing system in the educational process (for example, teaching the discipline of law)]. Psihologiya obrazovaniya v polikul'turnom prostranstve [Psychology of education in a multicultural space]. 2015, I. 32 (4), pp. 129–135. (in Russian)
16. Rekomendacii YuNESKO po politike v oblasti mobil'nogo obucheniya Institut YuNESKO po informacionnym tekhnologiyam v obrazovanii (IITO YuNESKO) – 2015 [UNESCO Recommendations on Mobile Learning Policy. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education (UNESCO IITE) - 2015]. Available at: https://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/ru/files/3214738.pdf (accessed 17 November 19). (in Russian)
17. Savel'ev Yu.A., Babich E.V. Komp'yuternaya metodika izucheniya nachertatel'noj geometrii. Tekhnicheskoe zadanie [Computer technique for the study of descriptive geometry. Terms of Reference]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2018, V. 6, I. 1, pp. 67–74. – DOI: 10.12737/article_5ad09d62e8a792.47611365. (in Russian)
18. Sal'kov N.A. Nachertatel'naya geometriya – baza dlya komp'yuternoj grafiki [Descriptive geometry - the basis for computer graphics]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2016, V. 4, I. 2, pp. 37–47. DOI: 10.12737/19832. (in Russian)
19. Sal'kov N.A. Mesto nachertatel'noj geometrii v sisteme geometricheskogo obrazovaniya tekhnicheskih vuzov [Place of descriptive geometry in the system of geometric education of technical universities]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2016, V. 4, I. 3, pp. 53–61. – DOI: 10.12737/21534. (in Russian)
20. Sal'kov N.A. Problemy sovremennogo geometricheskogo obrazovaniya [Problems of modern geometric education]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki v tekhnicheskom vuze: tradicii i innovacii [Quality problems of graphic training in a technical university: traditions and innovations]. 2018, pp. 38-46. (in Russian)
21. Sirenko S.N. Testirovanie v sisteme metodov kontrolya i ocenki znanij v sovremennom vuze [Testing in the system of methods for monitoring and evaluating knowledge in a modern university]. Innovacionnye obrazovatel'nye tekhnologii [Innovative educational technologies]. 2010, I. 2(22), pp. 44–51. (in Russian)
22. Tihonov-Bugrov D.E. O nekotoryh problemah graficheskoj podgotovki v tekhnicheskih vuzah [About some problems of graphic preparation in technical universities]. Problemy kachestva graficheskoj podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskom vuze: tradicii i innovacii [Problems of the quality of graphic preparation of students in a technical university: traditions and innovations]. 2014, V. 1, pp. 24–37. (in Russian)
23. Usanova E.V. Formirovanie bazovogo urovnya geometro-graficheskoj kompetentnosti v elektronnom obuchenii [Formation of the basic level of geographic graphic competence in e-learning]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2016, V. 4, I. 1, pp. 64–72. – DOI: 10.12737/18059. (in Russian)
24. Usataya T.V., Deryabina L.V., Reshetnikova E.S. Sovremennye podhody k proektirovaniyu izdelij v processe obucheniya studentov komp'yuternoj grafike [Modern approaches to product design in the process of teaching students computer graphics]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2019, V. 7, I. 1, pp. 74–82. DOI: 10.12737/article_5c91fd2bde0ff7.07282102. (in Russian)
25. Fedoseeva M.A. Metodika podgotovki studentov tekhnicheskih vuzov graficheskim disciplinam [Methods of preparing students of technical universities for graphic disciplines]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2019, V. 7, I. 1, pp. 68–73. – DOI: 10.12737/article_5c91fed8650bb7.79232969. (in Russian)
26. Chernyaeva T.N. Aktivizaciya uchebnoj deyatel'nosti studentov s primeneniem tekhnologij komp'yuternogo testirovaniya [Activization of educational activities of students using computer testing technologies]. Evrazijskij soyuz uchenyh [Eurasian Union of Scientists]. 2016, I. 3-2 (24), pp. 152–153. (in Russian)
27. Yumatova E.G. Sistema mezhintegrativnyh konstruktivno-analiticheskih zadach kak metod formirovaniya professional'no orientirovannyh sposobnostej budushchih inzhenerov [The system of inter-integrative structural and analytical tasks as a method of forming professionally oriented abilities of future engineers]. Geometriya i grafika [Geometry and graphics]. 2017, V. 5, I. 2, pp. 75–83. – DOI: 10.12737/article_5953f350da7151.85721309. (in Russian)
28. Yanbuhtina M.A. Resursy mobil'nogo obucheniya v optimizacii uchebnoj deyatel'nosti studentov bakalavriata [Mobile learning resources in optimizing the educational activities of undergraduate students]. Pedagogika i psihologiya obrazovaniya [Pedagogy and Psychology of Education]. 2019, I. 1. (in Russian)
29. Blair Erik, Kimila Inniss Student evaluation questionnaires and the developing world: An examination of the move from a hard copy to online modality Studies in Educational EvaluationVolume 40, March 2014, Pages 36-42.
30. Gimeno-Sanz Ana, Jose Macario de Siqueira Implementing online language exams within the Spanish National University Entrance Examination: The PAULEX Universitas Project, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Volume 34, 2012, Pages 68-72.
31. Nader Abdel Karim, Zarina Shukur Proposed features of an online examination interface design and its optimal values Computers in Human Behavior, November 2016, Volume 64, Pages 414-422.
32. Rasch G. On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology /In proceedings of the fourth berkley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Berkley: Univ. of California Press, 1961.
33. Verheyden G., B.Vandendoorent, K.Desloovere, A.Nieuwboer, H.Feys, F.Staes Implementing online examination incorporating video cases in a physical therapy curriculum. Results from a university-funded educational project Physiotherapy Volume 101, Supplement 1, May 2015, Pages e1585-e1586.
34. Yağci Mustafa, Menderes Ünal Designing and Implementing an Adaptive Online Examination System, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Volume 116, 21 February 2014, Pages 3079-3083.
