Coronacommunication as Crisis Communication Type (Based on the English and the Russian Languages)

N. Greydina

doi:doi:10.12737/2587-9103-2020-8-12

UDC 81

Coronacommunication as Crisis Communication Type (Based on the English and the Russian Languages)

Published в Scientific Research and Development. Modern Communication Studies · Volume 9, Issue 4, 2020 · Pages 8–12 · Rubrics: Common problems of the theory of communication

DOI 10.12737/2587-9103-2020-8-12

Received: 21.07.2020 Accepted: 03.08.2020 Published: 03.08.2020

Authors

N. Greydina ¹

1 Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry (Professor)

ABSTRACT

A new kind of crisis communication called coronacommunication is represented in the research article. The arguments in favour of correlating these concepts are presented. Crisis communication and coronacommunication as one of its types are defined; their characteristic features are indicated on the basis of comparative analysis. New English-language and Russian-language lexical units of the coronacommunicative sphere with an appropriate explanation of their meaning, specificity, and usage examples are introduced. The semantic dynamics of the development of new words and their derivatives in English and Russian is indicated. The common semantic load of the analysed neologisms with the interpretation of the main word and its derivatives meanings is stated. Metaphorical means and their vector basis for language and speech display of new words in English and Russian are analysed. The cognitive mechanism of coronacommunication context metaphorization is explained. Productive lexical means of speech expressiveness in the framework of coronacommunication is singled out. A comparison of English-language and Russian-language media discourses within the framework of coronacommunication is provided.

KEYWORDS

coronacommunication crisis communication neologism metaphorical model linguocognitive mechanism national world picture media discourse

Information References

Authors:

1. Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry (Professor)

Type:

Article

Pages:

from 8 to 12

Status:

Published

Subject area:

UDC 81

Language:

Russian

Keywords:

coronacommunication, crisis communication, neologism, metaphorical model, linguocognitive mechanism, national world picture, media discourse

References

1. Arutyunova N.D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka. M.: Yazyk, 1999. 896 s.

2. Baranov A.N., Karaulov Yu.N. Metafory obschestvennogo dialoga: voyna ili soglasie. // Znanie - sila. - 1991. - № 10. S. 60-63.

3. Vinogradov V.V. Russkiy yazyk. Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove. M.: Slovo, 2016. 283 s.

4. Evgen'eva A.P. Slovar' russkogo yazyka: v 4 t. M.: Russkiy yazyk, 2018. - T. 1. 328 s.

5. Zolotova G.A. O kategorii ocenki v russkom yazyke. // Rus. yaz. v shk. - 1980. - №2. C. 84-89.

6. Ivin A.A. Osnovaniya logiki ocenok. M.: Nauka, 1970. 268 s.

7. Kozhin A.N. Funkcional'nye tipy russkoy rechi. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2012. 223 s.

8. Kostin A.I. Globalistika i politicheskie nauki. // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. - Ser.11. Polit. nauki. - 2017. - № 3. S. 28-36.

9. Solganik G.Ya. O specifike gazetno-publicisticheskoy metafory. // Zhurnalistika i kul'tura russkoy rechi. - 2002. - № 2. S. 32-42.

10. Teliya V.N. Konnotativnyy aspekt semantiki nominativnyh edinic. M.: Nauka, 1986. 141 s.

11. Ulmer R., Sellnau T., Sidzher M. Effektivnaya krizisnaya kommunikaciya: ot krizisa k vozmozhnosti. M.: Most, 2011. 286 s.

12. Chudinov A.P. Rossiya v metaforicheskom zerkale: kognitivnoe issledovanie politicheskoy metafory. Ekaterinburg, 2001. 196 s.

13. Clausewitz C.V. On war. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989. 732 p.

14. Frandsen F., Johansen W. Rhetorical Arena (Crisis Theory). // In: Encyclopedia of Public Relations. New York: Sage, 2013. P. 798-800.

15. Greidina N.L. Globalization processes in Russian mass media: prospects and consequences. In: Populism, media, politics, and immigration in a globalized world. Madrid: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 2018. P. 16-25.

16. Johnson E. Critical metaphor analysis. // Bilingual Research Journal. - 2005. - Vol. 29. - № 1. P. 16-23.

17. Lakoff G., Johnsen M. Metaphors we live by. London: University Press, 2016. 193 p.

18. Lacey H. Is science value free? Values and scientific understanding. - London: Routledge, 2019. 285 p.

19. https://www.edition.cnn.com/2020/03/31/politics/donald-trump-coronavirus/index.html

20. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/trump-tweets-about-coronavirus-using-term-chinese-virus-n1161161

21. https://www.rt.com/op-ed/481764-coronavirus-trump-democrats-concern/

22. https://www.tvzvezda.ru/schedule/programs/201510291058-7whr.htm/20203241539-Guxyx.html

23. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term

24. https://www.yandex.ru/turbo?promo=navbar&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com&text=https%3A%2F%2Finopressa.ru%2Farticle%2F30Mar2020%2Fletemps%2Fcovidiot.html&last_related=1/

25. https://www.1tv.ru/news/issue/2020-04-24/21:00#1

Доступ и загрузка

🗂 JATS XML ❝ To cite 📎 Citations