CLINICAL STUDIES OF THE STABILITY AND PROCESS OF OSTEOINTEGRATION OF DENTAL IMPLANTS DURING IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED IMPLANTATION
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Subject. Analysis of the literature confirms that there is a definite relationship between surface microstructure, implant geometry, thread design and primary stability, and osseointegration processes. To date, a sufficient number of works on direct and delayed implantation have accumulated. However, there is not enough convincing clinical data on the quantitative assessment of primary stability at different periods of the osseointegration process. Despite the existence of experimental and clinical observations, it seems impossible to make a definite judgment about the mechanism of such a relationship. This chapter presents clinical studies of the stability and osseointegration of dental implants when performing, according to the indications, in 414 patients of direct and delayed implantation using implant systems with different surface microstructures. Goal. Conduct clinical studies of quantitative indicators of stability and osseointegration of implants with different microstructure of the surface during direct and delayed implantation. Methodology. For the clinical study of primary stability and the process of osseointegration during direct and delayed implantation with immediate functional loading, implant systems with different surface microstructures were used: Alfa Bio, Mis, Astra-Tech, Dentium, Ostem, Antogher, and also Humana Dental with an innovative surface. Osseointegrated implants have been used to achieve a predictable treatment outcome in clinical cases with partial or complete adentia, as well as in the presence of single, included defects. Results. There were no significant differences in stability indicators at the time of implant placement in the alveolar bone, depending on the type of implant and the method of implantation. Conclusions. In the process of integration of the implant into the bone tissue at a later date, the indicators of stability and osseointegration improve. The relationship between the appearance of the implant surface, primary stability and the time of its adaptation was revealed.

Keywords:
frequency resonance analysis, damping, stability, osseointegration, fixation, implants, periotestometry, immediate implantation , dentistry, clinical study
References

1. Elise G., Zuiderveld A., Meijer J. Henny, Vissink Ajian, Raghoebar M. Gerry. Immediate placement and privisionalization of an implants after removal of n impacted maxillary canine: two case reports // International Journal of Implants Dentistry. – 2015; 1: 13-19.

2. Naves M. M., Maezes H. H., Magalhaes D. Effect of microgeometry on the surface topography of dental implants // International Journal of implants Dentistry. – 2015; 30 (4): 789-799.

3. Cervino G., Romeo U., Lauritano F. Fem and von mises analysis of Osstem dental implant structural components: evaluation off different direction dynamic loads // The Open Dentistry Journal. – 2018; 12 (1): 99-239.

4. Sencimen M., Gulses A., Ozen J. et al. Early detection of alterations in the resonance frequency assessment of oral implant stability on various bone types: A clinical study // J Oral Implantol. – 2011; 37: 411-419.

5. Hulton J. E., Heath M. R., Chai J. Y. et al. Factors related to success and failure rate dental implants. A systematic review // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2012; 23: 767-774.

6. Jeong M. A., Kim S. G., Kim Y. K. et al., A multicenter prospective study in type IV bone of a single type of implant // Implant Dent. – 2012; 21: 330-334.

7. Simune A., Strnad J., Kopecka D. et al. Changes in stability after healing of immediately loaded dental implants // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2010; 25: 1085- 1092.

8. Mohanad Al-Sabbagh, Walied Eldomiaty. Yasser Khabbaz. Can osseointegration be without primary stability? // Dent Clin Noeth Arm. – 2019; 63 (3): 461- 463.

9. Trisi P., Berardini M., Falco A. et al. Effect of implant thread geometry on secondary stability, bone density, and bone-to-implant contact: a biomechanical and histological analysis // Implant Dent. – 2015; 24: 384-391.

10. Strub J. R., Judzik B. A., Tuna T. Prognosis of immediately loaded implants and their restorations: a systematic literature review // J Oral Rehabil. – 2012; 39: 704-717.

11. Atieh M. A., Alsabeeha M. H. M., Payne A. G. T. Can resonance frequency analysis predict failure risk of immediately loaded implants? // Int J Prostodont. – 2012; 25: 326-339.

12. Bogaerde L. V., Pedretti G., Sennerby L. et al. Immediate /early function of Neoss implantsplacedin maxillas and posterior mandibles: an 18- month prospective case series study // Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. – 2010; 12: 83-94.

13. Makovic A., Calvo-Guirado J. L., Lazic Z. et al. Evaluation of primary stability of self-tapping and non-self-tapping dental implants. A 12 - week clinical study // Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. – 2013; 15: 341-349.

14. Xing Yin, Jingtao Li, Waldemar Hoffman, Angelines Gasser et al. Mechanical and biological advantages of tri -oval implant design // J Clin Med. – 2019; 28, 8 (4): 427-436.

15. Fabbro M. D., Tascieri S., Canciani F., Addis S. Osseointegration of titanium Implants with different rough surface: histologic and histomorphometric study in adult miniping model // Implant Dent. – 2017; 28: 357-366.

16. Macary C., Menhall A., Zammarie C., Lombardi T. et al. Primary stability optimization by using fixtures with different thread depth loading implants // Materials (Basel). – 2019; 27, 12 (15): 398-411.

17. Jinno Y., Jimbo R., Tovar N., Taixeira H. S. et al. In vivo evaluation of dual acid- etched implants with identical microgeometry in high -density bone // Implants Dent. – 2017; 26: 815-819.

18. Ritte I. D., Dorogoy A., Shemtov-Yona K. Modeling the effect of osseointegration on dental implants pullout and torque removal tests // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Relate Research. – 2018; 86 (2051): 713-720.

19. Gaetano Marenzi, Glanrico Spagnuolo, Sammartino Jone Amilla et al. Micro- scae surface patterning of titanium dental implants by anodization in the presence of modifying salts // Materials (Basel). – 2019; 12 (11): 1753- 1764.

20. Mello C. C., Lemos S. A., Verri F. R., Dos Santos D. M. et al. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets versus delayed implants into healed sockets: a systematic review and meta – analysis // Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. – 2017; 26 (9): 1162- 1177.

21. Pigozo M. N., Rebelo da Costa T., Sesma N., Lagana D. C. Immediate versus early loading of single dental implants: a systematic review and analisis // J Prosthet Dent. – 2018; 120 (1): 25-34.

22. Bunev F. A., Muraev A. A., Gazhva Yu. V., Muhametshin R. V. i dr. Rezul'taty neposredstvennoy dental'noy implantacii s nemedlennoy nagruzkoy i obosnovanie protokola matematicheskogo modelirovaniya. Zhurnal nauchnyh statey. Zdorov'e i obrazovanie v HHI veke. 2018; 20, 9: 62-69. [F. A. Bunev, A. A. Muraev, Yu. V. Gazhva, R. V. Mukhametshin et al. Results of direct dental implantation with immediate loading and substantiation of the mathematical modeling protocol. Journal of scientific articles. Health and education in the XXI century. 2018; 20, 9: 62-69. (In Russ.)].

23. Panahov N. A. O., Mahmudov T.G.O. Uroven' stabil'nosti zubnyh implantatov v razlichnye sroki funkcionirovaniya. Problemy stomatologii. 2018; 14, 1: 89-93. [N. A. O. Panahov, T. G. O. Makhmudov. The level of stability of dental implants at different periods of operation. Actual problems in dentistry. 2018; 14, 1: 89-93. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32840697

24. Sysolyatin P. G., Gyunter V. E., Zheleznyy P. A., Zheleznyy S. P. Osteointegraciya razlichnyh implantatov pri peresadke kostnogo autotranpplantata v defekt nizhnem chelyusti v eksperimente. Problemy stomatologii. 2006; 5-6: 34-36. [P. G. Sysolyatin, V. E. Gunther, P. A. Zhelezny, S. P. Zhelezny. Osseointegration of various implants during transplantation of a bone autograft into a defect in the lower jaw in the experiment. Actual problems in dentistry. 2006; 5-6: 34-36. (In Russ.)].

25. Astashina N. B., Plyuhin D. V., Delec A. V. Prognozirovanie ishodov dental'noy implantacii na osnove izucheniya urovnya produktov okislitel'noy modifikacii belkov slyuny. Problemy stomatologii. 2017; 13, 3: 47-52. [N. B. Astashina, D. V. Plyukhin, A. V. Delets. Predicting the outcomes of dental implantation based on studying the level of products of oxidative modification of saliva proteins. Actual problems in dentistry. 2017; 13, 3: 47-52. (In Russ.)].


Login or Create
* Forgot password?