employee
Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
Tula, Tula, Russian Federation
The paper hypothesizes that the quality of education in the country is decreasing, the existing education management system is not effective, and contributes to a decrease in the quality of education. To assess the hypotheses, the profitability of human capital formed in education systems according to Rosstat data on the amount of remuneration of workers with different levels of education was considered. It was found that in 2009-2013, an increase in the level of education ensured an increase in the level of remuneration - receiving a bonus for the years of study, but during this period the premium over the years of study steadily decreased. In 2015-2019, the premium for obtaining all types of education, except for higher education, was completely lost. The higher education award has dropped significantly. These phenomena indicate a drop in the quality of education. They are due to the low level of funding for education and the archaic command and control system of education management, based on the administrative and control style of management, the instruments of which are orders, binding standards and control.
human capital, quality of education, administrative and control style of management, orders, standards, control
1. Naskol'ko bogata Rossiya? Kompleksnaya ocenka bogatstva Rossii s 2000 po 2017 gody. Vsemirnyy bank. URL: https://www.vsemirnyjbank.org/ru/country/russia/publication/how-wealthy-is-russia (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2020)
2. Bailey D., Schotta C. Private and social rates of return to education of academicians // American Economic Review. 1972. Vol. 62. No. 1/2. pp. 19–31.
3. Becker Gary S. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. 3 rd. Edition. University Of Chicago Press, 1994. 244 pp.
4. Schultz T. Capital formation by education // Journal of Political Economy. 1960, 68 (6), 571–583.
5. Schultz T. W. Investment in human capital // American Economic Review. 1961. Vol.51. No.1. pp. 1–17.
6. Gillis D. Public education as a high-yield investment: the theory of human capital in the discourse of European politics // Pedagogical Journal. 2011. 2 (2), 224–245.
7. Gillis D. Human Capital Theory in Education. In: Peters M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Pedagogical Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978–981–287–532–7_254–1
8. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Postindustrial'nye uklady v ekonomike Ros-sii. M.: INFRA-M, 2017. 159 c.
9. North D.C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cam-bridge University Press, 1990.
10. Basovskiy L.E., Basovskaya E.N. Razvitie v Rossii ekonomiki neravenstva // Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii. 2011. № 4. S. 198–202.
11. Gimpel'son V.E., Kapelyushnikov R.N., Luk'yanova A.L. Uroven' obrazovaniya rossiyskih rabotnikov: optimal'nyy, izbytochnyy, nedostatochnyy? M.: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2010. 64 c.
12. Reyting stran mira po urovnyu rashodov na obrazovanie // Gumanitarnyy por-tal. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/global-education-expenditure (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2020)
13. Tennent K.D. The Age of Strategy: From Drucker and Design to Planning and Por-ter. In: Bowden B., Muldoon J., Gould A., McMurray A. (eds) The Palgrave Hand-book of Management History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–319–62348–1_36–1
14. Peters T. Re-Imagine! Business Excellence in a Disruptive Age. Published March, 2006. 352 p.
15. Seddon J. Freedom from Command & Control. Rethinking Management for Lean Service. New York: Productivity Press, 2005. 232 p.
16. Sevost'yanov D.A. Obrazovatel'nye standarty i krizis obrazovaniya // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2018. № 4. S. 57–65.
