REACTION OF SPRING SOFT WHEAT TO DROUGHT IN THE FOREST-STEPPE OF THE TRANS-URALS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Abstract. The purpose of the research is the reaction of spring soft wheat varieties to dry phenomena during the growing season in the forest-steppe zone of the Trans-Urals. Methods. The material was 24 varieties of various biotypes for maturation from the nursery of the competitive variety testing of the Kurgan Research Institute of Agricultural Sciences. Results. The negative effect of the drought reduced the yield in the experiments by 11.9 c/ha, the weight of 1000 grains by 5.7 g, and the nature by 19.7 g/l. The influence of grain size on the yield both in favorable years and in years of drought was noted (r = 0.63…0.98). In arid conditions, vitreous is correlated with yield, 1000 grain weight, in kind, to a lesser extent with gluten content, bread volume, and “flour strength”. The lack of moisture during the grain filling period increased the gluten content by 3.4 %, the quality by 15.1 e. p. IDC, the flour strength by 102.7 e. a., the volume of bread by 106 g/l. In favorable years, the weight of 1000 grains and the vitreous content of the grain correlate with gluten (r = 0.44; r = 0.24–0.84). Indicators of productivity and physical properties of grain increase when sowing at the optimal time, with a certain decrease in the gluten content (by 1.2 %), flour strength (by 5.3 e. a.), bread volume (by 73.2 e. p.). In the early sowing period, moisture deficiency reduces the indicators for all varieties Under these conditions, early-maturing varieties form a larger grain both when sowing at an early time (29.0 g) and when sowing at the optimal (31.3 g). In a drought, the role of the variety is especially high. High drought resistance was shown by the Zauralochka variety of the Kurgan Research Institute of Agriculture, which successfully passed the test in the dry years (2012, 2020) in the GSI system and in the environmental test (KASIB). The yield of the drought-resistant variety Zauralochka on average for the HSU was 20.2 c/ha, exceeding the standard Hercules by 2.2 c/ha. Scientific novelty. The features of the influence of dry phenomena on the yield and the main indicators of the quality of varieties are revealed, the correlation between them is determined. According to drought resistance, a variety of spring soft wheat Zauralochka was selected.

Keywords:
drought, yield, quality, biotype, spring wheat
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Carvalho D., Cardoso Pereira, Rocha A. Future surface temperature changes for the Iberian Peninsula according to EURO-CORDEX climate projections // Climate Dynamics. 2020. No. 9. Pp. 123–138.

2. «Zasuha besprecedentnaya». V Rossii vozmozhny poteri urozhaya [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.bfm.ru/news/448584 (data obrascheniya: 29.03.2021).

3. Zal'cman V. A. Klimat i agrotehnologii: nekotorye priemy bor'by s zasuhoy // Nivy Rossii. 2018. № 8 (163). S. 69.

4. Dragavcev V. A., Mihaylenko I. M., Proskuryakov M. A. Nekanonicheskiy podhod k resheniyu zadachi nasledstvennogo povysheniya zasuhoustoychivosti u rasteniy (na primere hlebnyh zlakov) // Sel'skohozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2017. № 52 (3). S. 487–500.

5. Evdokimov M. G., Yusov V. S., Morgunov A. I., Zelenskiy Yu. I. Zasuhoustoychivyy genofond tverdoy yarovoy pshenicy, identificirovannyy v mnogoletnih ispytaniyah pitomnikov kazahstansko-sibirskoy selekcii pshenicy // Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selekcii. 2017. T. 21. № 5. S. 515–522.

6. Maksimov N. A. Izbrannye raboty po zasuhoustoychivosti i zimostoykosti rasteniy. Moskva: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1952. 2 t.

7. Gaponenko A. K. Zasuhoustoychivye sorta – eto zoloto [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.agroxxi.ru/gazeta-zaschita-rastenii/zrast/zasuhoustoichivye-sorta-yeto-zoloto.html (data obrascheniya: 20.03.2021).

8. Gulyanov Yu. A., Chibilev A. A., Chibilev (ml.) A. A. Rezervy povysheniya urozhaynosti i kachestva zerna ozimoy pshenicy i ih zavisimost' ot geterogennosti posevov v usloviyah stepnoy zony Orenburgskogo Predural'ya // Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie. 2020. T. 15. № 1 (54). S. 79–88.

9. Tagimanova D. S., Ergalieva A. Zh., Rayzer O. B., Hapilina O. N. Ocenka genotipov yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy na zasuhoustoychivost' v usloviyah in vitro // Eurasian Journal of Applied Biotechnology. 2013. № 2. S. 4–12.

10. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya sel'skohozyaystvennyh kul'tur. Moskva, 1985. 269 s.

11. Pryanishnikov A. I. Nauchnye osnovy adaptivnoy selekcii v Povolzh'e. Moskva: RAN, 2018. 96 s.

12. Eroshenko F. V., Storchak I. G., Engovatova I. V., Lihovid N. G. Ispol'zovanie dannyh distancionnogo zondirovaniya zemli dlya regional'noy ocenki kachestva zerna ozimoy pshenicy // InterKarto. InterGIS. 2020. T. 26. № 3. S. 240–251.

13. Keler V. V. Var'irovanie soderzhaniya kolichestva kleykoviny v zerne myagkoy yarovoy pshenicy pod vliyaniem meteorologicheskih usloviy Krasnoyarskogo kraya // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2020 № 2 (155). S. 58–62.

14. Lentochkin A. M. Sostoyanie proizvodstva i potrebleniya zerna // Permskiy agrarnyy vestnik. 2019. № 2 (26). S. 78–87.

15. Demina E. A., Kincharov A. I., Taranova T. Yu. Sravnitel'naya ocenka ishodnogo materiala yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy po masse 1000 zeren // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2018. T. 20. № 2-4 (82). S. 700–704.

16. Piskarev V. V., Zuev E. V., Brykova A. N. Ishodnyy material dlya selekcii yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy v usloviyah Novosibirskoy oblasti // Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selekcii. 2018. № 22 (7). S. 784–794.

17. Filippova E. A., Mal'ceva L. T., Bannikova N. Yu., Semenova T. V. Vliyanie prirodnyh faktorov na vegetacionnyy period, produktivnost' i kachestvo sortov myagkoy pshenicy // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2011. № 4. S. 4–9.

18. Kalabina T. S., Eliseev S. L., Yarkova N. N. Urozhaynost', tehnologicheskie pokazateli kachestva zerna i hlebopekarnye svoystva muki ozimoy pshenicy // Permskiy agrarnyy vestnik. 2020. № 4 (32). S. 41–49.

19. Filippova E. A., Mal'ceva L. T., Bannikova N. Yu. Drobot I. A. Formirovanie osnovnyh pokazateley kachestva zerna // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2017. № 5. S. 33–39.

20. Votchal E. F. Nauchnye zapiski po saharnoy promyshlennosti. VNIS. Kn. 3-4. Kiev, 1938.

21. Korobova N. A., Korobov A. P., Celuyko O. A. Urozhaynost' novyh sortov goroha FGBNU FRANC v ekologicheskom sortoispytanii // Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2020. № 5 (85). S. 61–65.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?