Abstract. The purpose. Analysis of the results and problems of the implementation of the Rural Mortgage Program, as well as a scientific substantiation of the need for its improvement in order to increase the financial accessibility of mortgage loans for rural residents and improve housing conditions on the village. Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study was the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists on issues of preferential mortgage lending, financial inclusion and the development of rural territories. The study was carried out using general scientific methods for analyzing and synthesis, induction and deduction, statistical and economic method. Results. An analysis of the implementation of preferential mortgage lending under the Rural Mortgage Program, which informed the high demand for this program among the population. A high concentration (more than 75%) issued preferential mortgage loans in three federal districts – Central, Volga and Siberian was revealed. It has been established that the level of approved applications of citizens on preferential loans is not high, the main reasons for the provision of a loan have become problems with purchased property, negative credit history or low creditworthiness of borrowers, due to the poverty of rural households. According to the data in 2020 in each third region of Russia, citizens who received a preferential rural mortgage more than rural residents, which confirms its low accessibility for the village. Scientific novelty. According to the results of scientific research on the basis of identified problems, the directions of the rural mortgage program were reasoned, taking into account the key factors of increasing the financial accessibility of mortgage loans for priority categories of rural population, young and large families, as well as the level of regional development of rural areas.
rural mortgage, preferential mortgage, financial accessibility, financial inclusion, rural areas, housing conditions, government program, preferential program, rural residents
1. Vartanova M. L., Bezverbnyy V. A. Povyshenie urovnya i kachestva zhizni naseleniya – glavnaya zadacha ustoychivogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy [Elektronnyy resurs] // Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya. 2019. Tom 9. № 3. S. 1925–1938. DOI: 10.18334/eo.9.3.40930. URL: https://1economic.ru/lib/40930 (data obrascheniya: 14.09.2021).
2. Altuhov A. I. Prostranstvennoe razvitie sel'skogo hozyaystva i sel'skih territoriy strany – osnova obespecheniya nacional'noy prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti // Vestnik Kurskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2021. № 3. S. 86–93.
3. Kuz'mich N. P. Razvitie social'noy infrastruktury sel'skih territoriy regiona v celyah uluchsheniya kachestva zhizni naseleniya // Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2019. Tom 9. № 4A. S. 392–399.
4. Bondarenko L., Tatarova L. Employment in rural Russia [e-resource] // IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 274. 2019. Article number 012068. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/274/1/012068/pdf. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/274/1/012068 (date of reference: 09.01.2022).
5. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 31 maya 2019 g. № 696 «Ob utverzhdenii gosudarstvennoy programmy Rossiyskoy Federacii «Kompleksnoe razvitie sel'skih territoriy»» [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://base.garant.ru/72260516 (data obrascheniya: 09.01.2022).
6. Zhilischnoe hozyaystvo v Rossii. 2019: Stat. sb. Moskva: Rosstat, 2019. 78 s.
7. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 30 noyabrya 2019 g. № 1567 «Ob utverzhdenii Pravil predostavleniya subsidiy iz federal'nogo byudzheta kreditnym organizaciyam i AO «DOM.RF» na vozmeschenie nedopoluchennyh dohodov po vydannym (priobretennym) zhilischnym (ipotechnym) kreditam (zaymam), predostavlennym grazhdanam Rossiyskoy Federacii na stroitel'stvo (priobretenie) zhilogo pomescheniya (zhilogo doma) na sel'skih territoriyah (sel'skih aglomeraciyah)» [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://base.garant.ru/73186746 (data obrascheniya: 17.09.2021).
8. Popova O. A. Usloviya i problemy realizacii gosprogrammy «Sel'skaya ipoteka» // Akademicheskiy vestnik Yakutskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2021. № 4 (21). S. 66–72.
9. Danilov Y., Pivovarov D. Finansovye aspekty modeli inklyuzivnogo rosta sovremennoy ekonomiki (Financial Aspects of the Inclusive Growth Model of the Modern Economy) [e-resource] // SSRN Electronic Journal. 2019. 15 March. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3354539. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3354539 (date of reference: 05.06.2021).
10. Sahay R., Čihák M., N’Diaye P., Barajas A., Mitra S., Kyobe A., Mooi Y. N., Y. S. Reza Financial Inclusion: Can It Meet Multiple Macroeconomic Goals? [e-resource]. 2015. IMF SDN 15/17. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1517.pdf (date of reference: 10.12.2021).
11. Gould D. M., Melecky M. Risks and Returns: Managing Financial Trade-Offs for Inclusive Growth in Europe and Central Asia. Europe and Central Asia Studies [e-resource]. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2017. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25494. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0967-5 (date of reference: 18.10.2021).
12. Rossiyane vzyali bolee 38,1 tys. kreditov po sel'skoy ipoteke v 2020 godu [Elektronnyy resurs] // TASS. 2020. 29 dekabrya. URL: https://tass.ru/nedvizhimost/10373329 (data obrascheniya: 05.08.2021).
13. Otchet o rezul'tatah ekspertno-analiticheskogo meropriyatiya «Ocenka rezul'tativnosti vydeleniya v 2019–2020 godah sredstv federal'nogo byudzheta na celi podderzhki rynka ipotechnogo kreditovaniya i zhilischnogo stroitel'stva, v tom chisle v ramkah mer po bor'be s koronavirusnoy infekciey i ee posledstviyami». Utverzhden Kollegiey Schetnoy palaty Rossiyskoy Federacii 14 maya 2021 g. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://ach.gov.ru/upload/iblock/4d9/fikgyxziwfxtswftfgy0a6z7pa3gfnwi.pdf (data obrascheniya: 18.06.2021).
14. Hodykin M. Zagorodnyy sbyt: na sel'skuyu ipoteku vydelyat 11,5 mlrd rubley [Elektronnyy resurs] // Izvestiya. 2021. 01 noyabrya. URL: https://iz.ru/1242638/maksim-khodykin/zagorodnyi-sbyt-na-selskuiu-ipoteku-vydeliat-115-mlrd-rublei (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2021).
15. Otchet o rezul'tatah ekspertno-analiticheskogo meropriyatiya «Analiz vliyaniya meropriyatiy po razvitiyu zhilischnogo stroitel'stva i inzhenernoy infrastruktury na uroven' razvitiya sel'skih territoriy, realizuemyh v 2018–2019 godah i istekshem periode 2020 goda v ramkah Gosudarstvennoy programmy razvitiya sel'skogo hozyaystva i regulirovaniya rynkov sel'skohozyaystvennoy produkcii, syr'ya i prodovol'stviya i gosudarstvennoy programmy Rossiyskoy Federacii «Kompleksnoe razvitie sel'skih territoriy». Utverzhden Kollegiey Schetnoy palaty Rossiyskoy Federacii 26 yanvarya 2021 g. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://ach.gov.ru/upload/iblock/ee1/ee159c19bdf6df58d385a02436ed0225.pdf (data obrascheniya: 18.06.2021).
16. Rossel'hozbank vydal bolee 62 mlrd rubley l'gotnoy sel'skoy ipoteki [Elektronnyy resurs] // AO «Rossel'hozbank». 2020. 07 dekabrya. URL: https://www.rshb.ru/news/438929 (data obrascheniya: 27.06.2021).
17. Nazvany regiony Rossii s naibol'shey doley gorozhan s sel'skoy ipotekoy [Elektronnyy resurs] // RBK. 2020. 18 noyabrya. URL: https://realty.rbc.ru/news/5fb4164d9a7947afa170ba65 (data obrascheniya: 12.09.2021).
18. Sidorevich E. Fenomen sel'skoy ipoteki [Elektronnyy resurs] // GMK. 2020. 05 avgusta. URL: https://gmk.ru/blog/fenomen-selskoj-ipoteki/ (data obrascheniya: 10.09.2021).
19. Ivanova T. A. Ipotechnoe kreditovanie kak sposob povysheniya dostupnosti zhil'ya v Rossii // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta kooperacii. 2021. № 1 (43). S. 68–71.
20. Petrikova E. M. L'gotnaya sel'skaya ipoteka v Rossii: mif ili real'nost' // Bankovskoe delo. 2021. № 4. S. 31–37.
