Denmark
Mitigation of global warming and transitioning to a green and sustainable world are counteracted by a number of barriers and dilemmas. The paper analyzes a number of these barriers and dilemmas in order to highlight efficient strategies and solutions for a sustainable development. The dilemmas include the following examples: • There are limits to economic and material growth in a finite globe, but most governments in industrial countries are calling for more growth in a period of financial crisis. • More equity is required to stem the desire for growth, but inequity is increasing. • The increase in global temperature should stay below two degrees centigrade in order to avoid irreversible consequences, but the present path points to four degrees or more. • At least 50% of known reserves of fossil fuels must remain underground in order to avoid a temperature increase higher than two degrees, but a number of industrial countries are now promoting exploitation of new fossil sources like shale gas and oil from tar sand. • Reversing population growth facilitates sustainable development, but most governments of industrial nations appear to be more concerned about decreases in their population.
sustainable energy, policy means, green transition.
1. Introduction
The world is presently faced with a number of serious problems including global warming and climate change, limits to economic and material growth, increasing inequities, misleading economic models and theories, and financial crises. Most national governments in the Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development (OECD) attempt to maintain traditional growth rates based on neoliberal principles. However, they do not appear to realize that a sustainable future requires radical changes in political, economic and institutional systems on international and national levels.
In relation to the problem of global warming, it has not been possible to date to obtain international commitments for binding reductions of CO2 emissions. However, there seems to be international consensus concerning the danger of irreversible consequences if the increase in global temperature is allowed to surpass two degrees centigrade. Recent analyses have concluded that in order to avoid this transition at least 50 % of known fossil reserves should remain untapped underground [IEA, 2012]. It is not obvious how this condition would be implemented in practice. Moreover, with the recent exploitation of non-traditional energy sources like shale gas and shale oil, the goal of limited use appears to be even more problematic. This issue should be high on the agenda of the united nations (UN), but so far it is not the case.
This paper will focus on the role of the rich industrial countries, as they are responsible for most of the present problems. In addition, such countries have the necessary economic and technological power to implement a green transition to a world that is not dependent on fossil fuels.
However, it should not be overlooked that there are a number of barriers for this transition. Strong financial power is connected to vested interests in production of fossil fuels, while concern about sustainable development is relegated as a low priority on the money-based agenda. Here, significant changes are needed to yield less power to the market and private vested interests. The paper includes concrete proposals for such changes.
1. CEESA Project (2012). Aalborg University, Denmark, www.ceesa.dk
2. Chang H-J (2010). 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism. Penguin Books, London, UK.
3. Daly HE (2007). Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar Publishers, Mass., USA.
4. DEFRA (2008). Synthesis report on the findings from DEFRA’s pre-feasibility study into personal carbon trading. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK.
5. EU Commission (2008). Questions and Answers on the Commission’s proposal to revise the EU Emissions Trading System. MEMO/08/35, January 2008, Bruxelles, Belgium.
6. Fawcett T., Hvelplund F., Meyer N.I. (2009). Making it personal: Per capita carbon allowances? In Generating Electricity in a Carbon Constrained World, edited by Fereidoon P. Sioshansi, Elsevier Publishers, Holland.
7. IEA (2012). World Energy outlook 2012. Paris, France.
8. Jackson R. (2012). Occupy Wall Street. Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont, USA.
9. Jackson T. (2005). Live better by consuming less? Is there a ‘double dividend’ in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology,9 (1–2), pp. 19–36.
10. Jackson T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth - Economics for a Finite Planet. Earth Scan, London, UK.
11. Keynes J.M. (1931). Essays in Persuasion. Milland and C°., London, UK.
12. Layard R. (2005). Happiness – Lessons from a New Science. Penguin Books, London, OK.
13. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens W.W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. Potomac Associates Publishers, Washington DC, USA.
14. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J. (1992). Beyond the Limits. Chelsea Green Publishing Co., Postmills, VT, USA.
15. Meadows D.H., Randers J., Meadows D.L. (2004). Limits to Growth. The 30 Year Update. Chelsea Green Publishing Co., Postmills, VT, USA.
16. Meyer N.I. (2007). Learning from Wind Energy Policy in the EU: Lessons from Denmark, Sweden and Spain. European Environment 17, pp. 347–362.
17. Meyer N.I. (2012). Enough is Enough – Stop the Non-Sustainable Development/ (in Danish)/ 17. 18. Tiderne Skifter Publishers, Copenhagen, Denmark.
18. Meyer N.I., Petersen K.H., Sørensen V. (1981). Revolt from the Center. Marion Boyars Publishing, London, UK.
19. Meyer N.I., Hvelplund F., Nørgård J.S. (2011). Equity, Economic Growth and Lifestyle. In Energy Sustainability and the Environment: Technology, incentives, behavior, F. Sioshnsi (ed.). Elsevier, Netherlands.
20. Meyer N.I., Atkinson A. (2012). From Sustainability Science to Real-World Action: A Short History of the
21. Balaton Group.Solutions, 3, issue 5, September-October. 2012, pp. 75–81.
22. Mill J.S. (1900). Principles of Political Economy (original version published in 1848). Revised edition, Vol. II, Colonial Press, New York, USA.
23. Nørgård J.S. (2006). Consumer efficiency in conflict with GDP growth. Ecological Economics, 57, pp. 15–29.
24. Nørgård J.S., Brange B., Guldbrandsen T., Karbo P. (2007). Turning the Appliance Market around towards A++. Proceedings of the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Summer Study 2007, Stockholm: ECEEE, pp. 155–164.
25. Nørgård J.S. (2009). Avoiding Rebound through a Steady State Economy. In: Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption. The Rebound Effect. Herring,H & Sorell, S. (eds.). Ch. 10, 204–223. Palgrave Macmillan, UK.
26. Nørgård J.S., Peet J., Ragnarsdóttir K.V. (2010). The history of The Limits to Growth. Solutions, vol. 1, No. 2, March-April, pp. 59–63. http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/569.
27. Piketty T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Belknap Press, US.
28. Stern N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Storbritannien, 2007.
29. Turner G.M. (2009). A Comparison of the ‘Limits to Growth’ with 30 Years of Reality. Global Environmental Change (in press). http://www.csiro.au/files/files/plje.pdf.
30. UNEP (2008). Reforming Energy Subsidies. United Nations Environment Programme. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, New York, USA.
31. UN Population Division (2008). World Population Policies 2007. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations, New York, USA. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2007/Publication_index.htm.
32. Vuuren D.P. van, Faber A. (2009). Growing within Limits — A Report to the Global Assembly 2009 of the Club of Rome. The Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Bilthoven, The Netherlands. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/500201001.pdf.
33. Wetterberg G. (2010). A Nordic Union/ (in Danish)/ published by the Nordic Council of Ministers, 34. Copenhagen, Denmark.
34. Wilkinson R., Pickett K. (2009). The Spirit Level. www.equalitytrust.org.uk.
