employee
Perm State University (kafedra predprinimatel'skogo prava, grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo processa )
graduate student from 01.01.2019 to 01.01.2022
Irkutskiy yuridicheskiy institut (filial) Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii (kafedra grazhdansko-pravovyh disciplin, docent)
employee from 01.01.2020 until now
Irkutsk, Irkutsk region, Russian Federation
The article features the principles of proper and specific performance of civil obligations and their correlation. The principle of proper execution presupposes that the debtor's actions comply with the terms of the agreement and the requirements of the law or customs in terms of the provision of the proper subject by the proper person in the proper place and at the proper time. This principle is universal for all stages. The principle of specific performance is characteristic of the abnormal stage: it is when the debtor refuses to perform the in-kind financial obligations. The author analyzed Articles 308.3 and 396 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. They contain rules on the ratio of the award to execution in kind with other ways of protecting civil rights. The article introduces negative (objective and subjective) and positive limits of the principle of specific performance. The principle of specific performance is not the same as the reality of performance as an element of the principle of specific performance (proper subject). The article contains some ideas on how to improve the civil legislation.
performance of obligations, proper performance, specific performance, in-kind performance, way of protection, principles of performance of obligations
1. Ananeva K. Ya., Ananev A. G. New approaches to determining the composition of the principles of performance of obligations. Legal Science, 2016, (5): 78–84. (In Russ.)
2. Ioffe O. S. Mandatory law. Moscow: Iurid. lit., 1975, 880. (In Russ.)
3. Civil law. Vol. 3: Mandatory law, ed. Sukhanov E. A. 3rd ed. Moscow: Volters Kluver, 2005, 800. (In Russ.)
4. Khokhlov V. A. General provisions on obligations. Moscow: Statut, 2015, 288. (In Russ.)
5. Belykh V. S. Legal regulation of business activity in Russia. Moscow: TK Velbi; Prospekt, 2005, 432. (In Russ.)
6. Sarbash S. V. Performance of a contractual obligation. Moscow: Statut, 2005, 636. (In Russ.)
7. Alyakin D. S. Due and specific performance of contractual obligations under Russian law. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo, 2020, 11(3): 584–600. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.304
8. Solomina N. G. Obligation from unjustified enrichment: concept, types, and performance. Moscow: Iustitsinform, 2009, 288. (In Russ.)
9. Gabriel N. V. The essence of the principle of in-kind obligations’ performance under the civil law of the Russian Federation. Legal problems of strengthening Russian statehood, ed. Volovich V. F. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2000, pt. 5, 49–52. (In Russ.)
10. Karapetov A. G. Enforcement to in-kind obligations’ performance. Moscow: Statut, 2003, 190. (In Russ.)
11. Rovniy V. V. Principles of performance of obligations (issues of dynamics). Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik, 1999, (1): 32–37. (In Russ.)
12. Nusratulloev B. K. The principle of specific performance of obligations: its essence and role of the at the present stage of the civil legislation development in the Republic of Tajikistan. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki, 2016, (32): 231–238. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2016-32-231-238
13. Kuzmina I. D. Composition of the principles of obligation's performance. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya "Pravo", 2018, (1): 61–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25513/1990-5173.2018.1.61-67
14. Krasnov N. I. Specific performance of contractual obligations between socialist organizations. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1959, 192. (In Russ.)
15. Sverdlyk G. A. Principles of Soviet civil law. Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoiar. un-ta, 1985, 200. (In Russ.)
16. Venediktov A. V. Civil and legal protection of socialist property in the USSR. Moscow-Leningrad: AS USSR, 1954, 268. (In Russ.)
17. Novitskii I. B., Lunts L. A. The general doctrine of commitment. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1950, 416. (In Russ.)
18. Braginsky M. I., Vitrianskii V. V. Contract law. Book 1: General provisions. 3rd ed. Moscow: Statut, 2011, 847. (In Russ.)
19. Volos A. A. On the issue of correlation of the due and actual performance of an obligation. Legal Science, 2013, (2): 31–32. (In Russ.)
20. Rakhmankulov Kh. R. Contract law. Tashkent: GTsR, 2015, 400. (In Russ.)
