Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDK 346.26 Частное предпринимательство
Purpose: To describe the first results of a unique experience of Emperor Alexander I St. Petersburg State Transport University (PGUPS) as a branch transport university where there has been created a school of engineering entrepreneurship in the university scientific-educational ecosystem. Methods: System analysis of open sources of the Internet and of PGUPS development program till 2030; as well as ecosystem, modular and project approaches for organizing the work of engineering entrepreneurship school. Results: The study shows that the search for effective formats for the development of human capital becomes particularly relevant in ensuring national technological sovereignty, and the creation of an engineering entrepreneurship school on a university basis as a new format for generating and integrating innovations is a time dictate. The key purpose of an engineering entrepreneurship school is an intellectual elite preparation by educational modules of entrepreneurship, engineering and inventive creativity of students with the formation of a unique pool of competencies in organization and management of full lifecycle of projects, innovations and high-tech production. It is noted that a branch university image is transformed into an ecosystem capable of creating a unique entrepreneurial space for involving students, employees and industrial partners into their own know-how hub. Practical significance: The application and subsequent scaling of the unique experience of PSUPS as a branch university will allow to pursue outrunning training of human capital with expanded scarce competencies and will form growth points in the competitiveness of transport education in modern Industry 4.0.
school of engineering entrepreneurship, ecosystem, transport university, innovative educational project, Industry 4.0, University 4.0
1. Nacional'nyy doklad «Vysokotehnologichnyy biznes v regionah Rossii» 2020 [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://roscongress.org/materials/natsionalnyy-doklad-vysokotekhnologichnyy-biznes-v-regionakh-rossii-2020/; 01.05.2022.
2. Inzhenernye shkoly i tehnologicheskoe predprinimatel'stvo voshli v spisok strategicheskih iniciativ, utverzhdennyh Pravitel'stvom [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/press-center/news/?ELEMENT_ID=40974; 01.05.2022.
3. Ya – professional. Tehnologicheskoe predprinimatel'stvo [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://yandex.ru/profi/courses2021/technology_business; 01.05.2022.
4. Universitety 4.0 [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://business-magazine.online/fn_17960.html; 01.05.2022.
5. Y.G. Vissema. Universitet tret'ego pokoleniya. – M.: Olimp-Biznes, 2016. – 480 s.
6. Moore, J. F. (1993), «Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition», Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71 No 3, pp. 75–86.
7. H. H. Olsson and J. Bosch, "Strategic Ecosystem Management: A Multi-case Study on Challenges and Strategies for Different Ecosystem Types," 2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, Madeira, Portugal, 2015, pp. 398-401, doi: 10.1109/SEAA.2015.44.
8. Kiselev I.P., Panychev A.Yu., Fortunatov V.V. Obschepoleznoe dlya Rossii uchrezhdenie: 100 faktov iz istorii Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobscheniya Imperatora Aleksandra I. – Sankt-Peterburg, 2017. – 128 s.
9. Panychev A.Yu., Pokrovskaya O.D. EKOSISTEMA UNIVERSITETA TRET'EGO POKOLENIYa V USLOVIYaH GLOBAL'NOY CIFROVIZACII // V sb.: III Betankurovskiy mezhdunarodnyy inzhenernyy forum. – Sbornik trudov. – Sankt-Peterburg, PGUPS, 2021. – S. 74-77.
10. Panychev A.Yu., Pokrovskaya O.D. BIZNES-EKOSISTEMY V TRANSPORTNOM OBRAZOVANII: SPECIFIKA I POTENCIAL // V sb.: III Betankurovskiy mezhdunarodnyy inzhenernyy forum. – Sbornik trudov. – Sankt-Peterburg, PGUPS, 2021. – S. 77-80.
11. Panychev A.Yu., Pokrovskaya O.D. SOVREMENNYE TRENDY V KONCEPTE EVOLYuCII EKOSISTEMY TRANSPORTNOGO UNIVERSITETA//Tehnik transporta: obrazovanie i praktika. – 2021. – T. 2. – № 2. – S. 128-146. DOI: 10.46684/2687-1033.2021.2.128-146
12. Arora A., Fosfuri A., Gambardella A. Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy [Electronic resource] // SSRN. – 2000. – Mode of access: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.204848
13. Hicks D., Hegde D. Highly Innovative Small Firms in the Market for Technology: Working Paper № 4 [Electronic resource] // CiteSeerX. – 2005. – Mode of access: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.93.9394&rep=rep1&type=pdf
14. H. Etzkowitz, J. Dzisah. Rethinking development: circulation in the triple helix//Technology Analysis f& Strategic Management, Vol. 20, #6, 2008.
15. Efimov V.S., Lapteva A.V. UNIVERSITET 4.0: FILOSOFSKO-METODOLOGIChESKIY ANALIZ. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. 2017;21(1):16-29. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.01.002
16. Fadeev A. S., Zmeev O. A., Gazizov T. T. MODEL' UNIVERSITETA 4.0 // Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozrenie (Pedagogical Review). 2020. Vyp. 2 (30). S. 172-178. DOI:10.23951/2307-6127-2020-2-172-178
17. Tihomirova O.G. TEHNOLOGIChESKOE PREDPRINIMATEL'STVO I INNOVACIONNYE OBRAZOVATEL'NYE TEHNOLOGII V CIFROVOY EKONOMIKE // Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava. – 2019. – № 11-1. – S. 162-167.
18. Hayrullina M.V. Tehnologicheskoe predprinimatel'stvo: sderzhivayuschie faktory i usloviya razvitiya // Rossiyskoe predprinimatel'stvo. — 2016. — T. 17. — № 16. — S. 1831–1848. — doi: 10.18334/rp.17.16.36402
