St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
The article describes the phenomenology of academic dishonesty in offline and online learning. The authors developed a questionnaire to assess the occurrence of various types of cheating, students’ subjective attitude to academic dishonesty, and its context. The study involved 52 university students aged 18–25 (37 female respondents). The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis using the G-criterion and the Fisher’s angular transformation. The content analysis consisted of questions that required an extended answer. In online environment, the most common form of academic dishonesty was cheating at exams and tests by copying a fellow student's digital work, imitating technical problems, googling for answers, and providing false references. Students treated online academic dishonesty as more acceptable than during face-to-face learning. The study proves that the phenomenology of online academic dishonesty is significantly different from its traditional variant and, therefore, requires more detailed research.
digital academic dishonesty, online learning, students, university
1. Bezgodova S. A., Miklyaeva A. V. Digital academic dishonesty: a socio-psychological analysis. Science for Education Today, 2021, 11(4): 64–90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2104.04
2. Spasennikov V. V., Androsov K. Y. Academic fraud and motivation of modern universities students’ educational activities. Ergodesign, 2020, (2): 72–80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30987/2658-4026-2020-2-72-80
3. Amigud A., Dawson P. The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019, 45(1): 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1612851
4. Bacon A. M., McDaid C., Williams N., Corr P. J. What motivates academic dishonesty in students? A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020, 90(1): 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12269
5. Bretag T., Harper R., Burton M., Ellis C., Newton P. H., Rozenberg P., Saddiqui S., van Haeringen K. Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 2019, 44(11): 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788
6. Caskurlu S., Richardson J. C., Maeda Y., Kozan K. The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: a thematic synthesis. Computers & Education, 2021, 165(2): 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111
7. Chang C. M., Chen Y.-L., Huang Y.-y., Chou C. Why do they become potential cyber-plagiarizers? Exploring the alternative thinking of copy-and-paste youth in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 2015, (87): 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.006
8. Chankova M. Teaching academic integrity: the missing link. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2020, 18(2): 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09356-y
9. Daniels L. M., Goegan L. D., Parker P. C. The impact of COVID-19 triggered changes to instruction and assessment on university students’ self-reported motivation, engagement and perceptions. Social Psychology of Education, 2021, 24(1): 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09612-3
10. Djajadikerta H. G., Trireksani T., Ong T., Roni S. M., Kazemian S., Zhang J., Noor A. H. M., Ismail S., Ahmad M. A. N., Azhar Z., Shahbudin A. S. M., Maradona A. F., Yanto H., Wahyuningrum I. F. S. Australian, Malaysian and Indonesian accounting academics’ teaching experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 2021, 15(2): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v15i2.7
11. Hanafy S. M., Jumaa M. I., Arafa M. A. A comparative study of online learning in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic versus conventional learning. Saudi Medical Journal, 2021, 42(3): 324–331. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2021.42.3.20200741
12. Lawson R. A. Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the "Real World"? Journal of Business Ethics, 2004, 49(2): 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015784.34148.cb
13. LoSchiavo F. M., Shatz M. A. The impact of the honor code on online course fraud. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 2011, 7 (2): 179–184.
14. Miller A., Shoptaugh C., Wooldridge J. Reasons not to cheat, academic-integrity responsibility, and frequency of cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 2011, 79(2): 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903567830
15. Ruiperez-Valiente J. A., Munoz-Merino P. J., Alexandron G., Pritchard D. E. Using machine learning to detect 'multiple-account' cheating and analyze the influence of student and problem features. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2019, 12(1): 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2784420
16. Shmeleva E. Plagiarism and cheating in Russian universities: The role of the learning environment and personal characteristics of students. Educational Studies Moscow, 2016, (1): 84–109. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-84-109
