Russian Federation
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Perm', Perm, Russian Federation
Abstract. The article is devoted to the study of the resilience of territorial space of rural areas in modern conditions. The hypothesis is the assumption that the preconditions for the resilience of rural areas in the conditions of modern economic uncertainty are the existing resource potential, industry specifics, as well as the traditional way of the regional agrarian economy. The aim is to study the phenomenon of resilience in relation to rural areas. Objectives: to consider current trends in the development of rural areas at the regional level; to develop a methodology and assess the resilience of rural areas. Methods: scientific analysis and synthesis, analytical interpretation of official statistical data and horizontal analysis, factor aggregation, additive analysis. Scientific novelty. On the basis of generalization of theoretical provisions and development of methodological tools the author's approach to the assessment of operational resilience of rural areas in social, economic and environmental directions was proposed. Results. The interdisciplinary nature of resilience is considered, the review of scientific works of scientists specializing in the spatial development of regional economy, sustainable development of rural areas, state and municipal administration, agroindustrial activity is carried out, the main trends in the development of rural areas under the transformation of social relations of the Russian Federation are considered. The conclusion is formulated that the analysis of transformation processes is necessary not only to restore the lost positions of rural areas of regional space, but also to develop and implement operational measures of resilience taking into account the constantly emerging risks, threats and shocks. The results of the study carried out on statistical indicators of Perm Krai have shown the increasing importance of social infrastructure and its impact on the sustainability of the agrarian economy of the region. The scientific contribution is the approbation of the author's methodology for assessing the operational resilience of rural areas during the instability of hydrocarbon and fuel prices, fluctuations in the national currency and tightening sanctions, the pandemic of coronavirus infection and its consequences. The directions for future research are to determine the trajectories of resilience of the territorial space of the country in the context of federal districts and constituent entities of Russia.
resilience, rural areas, region, spatial development, directions of development, agrarian economy, economic uncertainty, assessment of operational resilience
1. Akvazba E. O., Leonova E. Yu. Fenomen rezil'entnosti v sovremennom rossiyskom obschestve // Russian Economic Bulletin. 2021. T. 4. № 5. S. 55–60.
2. Selivanova O. A., Bystrova N. V., Derecha I. I., Mamontova T. S., Panfilova O. V. Izuchenie fenomena rezil'entnosti: problemy i perspektivy [Elektronnyy resurs] // Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya. 2020. № 3. URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/04PSMN320.pdf (data obrascheniya: 01.08.2022).
3. Shevcov V. V. Razvitie sel'skih territoriy i koncepciya ustoychivosti // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatischeva. 2022. T. 2. № 1 (49). S. 130–137. DOI: 10.51965/20767919_2022_2_1_130.
4. Fontanari M., Traskevich A. G. Koncepciya rezil'entnosti destinaciy i perspektivy ee primeneniya v otnoshenii sel'skih destinaciy Belarusi // Belorusskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2019. № 1 (86). S. 136–151.
5. Golovina S. G., Ruchkin A. V., Mikolaychik I. N. Evropeyskiy opyt podderzhki sel'skih territoriy: rekomendacii po vnedreniyu v otechestvennuyu praktiku // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2022. № 02 (217). S. 71–81. DOI: 10.32417/1997-4868-2022-217-02-71-81.
6. Nikulkina I. V., Gordyachkova O. V., Kalavriy T. Yu., Vanderlinden Zh.-P. Rezil'entnost' social'no-ekonomicheskih sistem: metodologicheskiy aspekt // Voprosy innovacionnoy ekonomiki. 2022. T. 12. № 1. S. 659–668. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.12.1.114087.
7. Polushkina T. M., Akimova Yu. A., Kovalenko E. G. Social'nye standarty i inklyuzivnaya model' razvitiya sel'skih territoriy // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2022. № 2. S. 359–383. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.2.1929.
8. Smorodinskaya N. V., Katukov D. D. Rezil'entnost' ekonomicheskih sistem v epohu globalizacii i vnezapnyh shokov // Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2021. № 5. S. 93–115. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2021_5_93_115.
9. Vysockiy S. Yu. Statisticheskaya ocenka ekonomicheskoy rezil'entnosti regionov respubliki Belarus' // Vestnik Polockogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya D. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2021. № 14. S. 30–35. DOI: 10.52928/2070-1632-2021-59-14-30-35.
10. Korezin A. S., Murashov S. B. Rezil'entnost' social'nyh sistem: suschnost' koncepta i ego primenimost' na raznyh urovnyah sociuma // Teleskop: zhurnal sociologicheskih i marketingovyh issledovaniy. 2021. № 1. S. 17–22. DOI: 10.51692/1994-3776_2021_1_17.
11. Merenkova I. N., Novikova I. I., Gavrilova Z. V. Kognitivnoe modelirovanie diversificirovannogo razvitiya sel'skoy ekonomiki v usloviyah cifrovizacii // Russian Economic Bulletin. 2022. T. 5. № 3. S. 82–87.
12. Nikulkina I. V., Gordyachkova O. V., Gerardi Zh. Faktory, opredelyayuschie rezil'entnost' social'no-ekonomicheskih sistem arkticheskih poseleniy // Ekonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. 2020. T. 10. № 12. S. 2977–2988. DOI: 10.18334/epp.10.12.111478.
13. Semin A. N., Tret'yakov A. P., Lylov A. S. Sel'skie territorii: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya. Moskva: OOO «KOL LOK», 2021. 224 s.
14. Kovalev V. E., Semin A. N. Rezil'entnost' agroprodovol'stvennogo rynka Rossii v usloviyah tamozhennyh disbalansov evraziyskoy integracii // Journal of New Economy. 2021. T. 22. № 3. S. 28–43. DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-3-2.
15. Lamine C., Magda D., Amiot M.-J. Crossing sociological, ecological, and nutritional perspectives on agrifood systems transitions: towards a transdisciplinary territorial approach // Sustainability. 2019. No. 11. Rp. 1–18.
16. Mantino F., Vanni F. The role of localized agri-food systems in the provision of environmental and social benefits in peripheral areas: Evidence from two case studies in Italy // Agriculture (Switzerland). 2018. No. 8 (8). DOI: 10.3390/agriculture8080120.
17. Altuhov A. I. Prostranstvennoe razvitie sel'skogo hozyaystva i sel'skih territoriy strany – osnova obespecheniya nacional'noy prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti // Vestnik Kurskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skohozyaystvennoy akademii. 2021. № 3. S. 86–93.
18. Miroshnichenko T. A., Podgorskaya S. V. Ocenka inklyuzivnogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy regionov Rossii // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2022. № 03 (218). S. 83–94. DOI: 10.32417/1997-4868- 2022-218-03-83-94.
19. Avdeeva T. T., Lavrova T. G. Sovremennye tendencii differenciacii social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya sel'skih territoriy v regional'nom prostranstve // Modern Economy Success. 2022. № 2. S. 192–200.
20. Zakshevskiy V. G., Merenkova I. N., Novikova I. I., Kusmagambetova E. S. Metodicheskiy instrumentariy diagnostiki diversifikacii sel'skoy ekonomiki // Ekonomika regiona. 2019. T. 15. № 2. S. 520–533. DOI: 10.17059/2019-2-16.
21. Agibalov A. V., Zaporozhceva L. A., Tkacheva Yu. V. Formirovanie metodiki ocenki kachestva ustoychivosti razvitiya sel'skih territoriy // International Agricultural Journal. 2020. T. 63. № 1. S. 54–66. DOI: 10.24411/2588-0209-2020-10130.
22. Permskiy kray v cifrah. 2022: Kratkiy statisticheskiy sbornik. Perm': Territorial'nyy organ Federal'noy sluzhby gosudarstvennoy statistiki po Permskomu krayu, 2022. 195 c.
23. Shamin A. E., Zueva S. V. Ustoychivoe razvitie sel'skih territoriy v regional'noy ekonomike strany // Vestnik NGIEI. 2022. № 1 (128). S. 101–111. DOI: 10.24412/2227-9407-2022-1-101-111.
24. Yarkova T. M. Razvitie sel'skih territoriy: social'no-ekonomicheskiy aspekt // Prodovol'stvennaya politika i bezopasnost'. 2022. T. 9. № 1. S. 67–78. DOI: 10.18334/ppib.9.1.114341.
