New public management practices in prestigious universities are researched in this paper. Based on the field study — higher-education teaching personnel (HETP) interrogation — problem areas related to university managerialism policy have been revealed. It has been shown, that the administrative machine and control department extension, as well as low level of professorship involvement in decision-making destroy the academic autonomy and create a latent conflict between managers and HETP.
new public management, new principals of state management, research university, academic autonomy, institutional changes, social influence, conflict.
В условиях сокращающегося государственного финансирования, массификации высшего образования, возрастающей конкуренции, глобализации и других мировых тенденций большинство развитых стран проводят обширные институциональные реформы управления университетами, которые определяются менеджериальным подходом. Специфическими чертами NPM (New Public Management, новые принципы государственного управления) являются конкурсное финансирование, постоянный мониторинг и оценка деятельности, составление рейтингов организаций, оплата труда на основе достижения индикаторов, поощрение контрактов с бизнесом для коммерциализации результатов интеллектуальной деятельности, внедрение систем отчетности и аудита с участием внешних экспертов и др.
1. Abramov R.N. Transformations of academic autonomy. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. 2010, I. 3, pp. 75–91. (in Russian)
2. Abramov R.N. Managerialism and academic profession, Conflict and interaction. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological Research] 2011, I. 7, pp. 37–47. (in Russian)
3. Getmann K.F. «Konkurentsii – da, rynku – net». Interv´yu. [“Competition – yes, Markets – No”. Interview.]. Logos, 2013, I. 1 (91), pp. 144–168. (in Russian)
4. Dimadzhio P., Pauell U. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review Vol. 48, No. 2 (Apr., 1983), pp. 147–160 (Russ. ed.: Dimadzhio P., Pauell U. Novyy vzglyad na «zheleznuyu kletku»: institutsional´nyy izomorfizm i kollektivnaya ratsional´nost´ v organizatsionnykh polyakh. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, 2010, T.11, №1. pp. 34–57)
5. Dushina M.O. "New Public Management " and the reform of Russian science. Nauka i tekhnika: voprosy istorii i teorii. Materialy XXXV mezhdunarodnoy godichnoy konferentsii Sankt-Peterburgskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskogo natsional´nogo komiteta po istorii i filosofii nauki i tekhniki RAN «Nauka i tekhnika v Pervuyu mirovuyu voynu» (24–28 noyabrya 2014 g.) Vypusk XXX. [Science and technology: history and theory questions . Materials XXXV International annual conference of the St. Petersburg branch of the Russian National Committee for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology of the RAS "Science and Technology in the First World War" (24–28 November 2014). XXX Edition.]. St. Petersburg, SPbF IIYET RAN Publ., 2014. pp. 157 (in Russian)
6. Rozovski G. Research universities: American exceptionalism? Voprosy obrazovaniya. [Educational Studies (Moscow)]. 2014, I. 2, pp. 8–19. (in Russian)
7. Knorre A. Institutskaya nauka : Mikhail Sokolov o tom , kak stanovyatsya professorami v Amerike , Yevrope i Rossii. Teorii i praktiki — platforma dlya obmena znaniyami. Avaible at: http://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/8761-sokolov-euspb (Accessed 24 May 2015) (in Russian)
8. Halffman, W., & Radder, H. The academic manifesto: From an occupied to a public university. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy. Online first (3 April 2015). Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11024-015-9270-9 (Accessed 7.05.2015)
9. Marginson S. Academic creativity under new public management: foundation for an investigation. Educational theory, Vol. 58, Issue 3. pp. 269–287.
10. Marginson S., Considine, M. The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
11. Slaughter S., Cantwell B. Transatlantic moves to the market: The United States and the European union. Higher Education, 2012, 63. pp. 583–606.
12. Whitley R., Gläser J. Organisational Transformation and Scientific Change: The Impact of Institutional Restructuring on Universities and Intellectual Innovation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 42, pp. 1–15.
