General characterisation of the determinational complex of terrorist activity

Kristina Abisova

doi:doi:10.35750/2713-0622-2024-1-22-32

VAK Russia 5.3.9 UDC 343.92

General characterisation of the determinational complex of terrorist activity

Published в Russian Journal of Deviant Behavior · Volume 4, Issue 1, 2024 · Pages 22–32 · Rubrics: Methodology for studying deviant behavior

DOI 10.35750/2713-0622-2024-1-22-32

Received: 12.03.2024 Accepted: 29.03.2024 Published: 27.04.2024 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Kristina Abisova ¹ iD

1 Crimea branch of the Krasnodar University of the MIA of Russia (the department of criminal law and criminology, lecturer of the department)
from 01.01.2023 until now Simferopol, Simferopol, Russian Federation

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Understanding of the complexity, diversity of types and forms, technological nature of terrorist activity as a modern socio-legal phenomenon, its place and role in the dynamics of social development of modern transitional society, as well as the need for systemic counteraction to it determines the need for a comprehensive examination of terrorist activity and its manifestations in various projections and dimensions (abstraction intervals). The regularities of its functioning are systemic and are summarised in such principles as integrativity, integrity, holism, emergentism, synergy and hierarchy. The synthesis of knowledge from each of the dimensions makes it possible to obtain an interval model of terrorist activity, which enriches the criminological study of terrorist activity by revealing its multidimensional nature and establishing the mechanisms of determination. Research Methods. The methodological basis of the research was formed by the fundamental foundations and postulates of philosophical methodology: universal categories, principles and regularities of the dialectical, interval and activity approaches, general scientific methodology of the system approach, as well as general logical methods of cognition (methods of analysis and synthesis, abstraction and generalisation (concretisation), deduction and induction, systematisation, classification, description). The use of methodology of the interval approach provides a comprehensive study of terrorist activity and its manifestations in various projections and dimensions. Results. The determinational complex of terrorist activity was established, which is characterised by a combination of biological (natural and heliogeophysical factors, technologisation of the living environment, etc.); mental (related to the personality of the subject of terrorist activity and its victims); spiritual (religious and ethical); social (poverty, social inequality, unfavourable social conditions of society, etc.); legal (imperfection of legal means of regulating social relations, the possibility of legalisation of ideology and practice of violence, determined by the absence or ineffectiveness of legal prohibitions on terrorist activities, etc.); political (change in the unipolarity of the world order system, geopolitical confrontation of certain subjects of world politics, struggle for autonomy, political competition, etc.) factors. Identification of these factors makes it possible to effectively influence them as an object of preventive activity.

KEYWORDS

terrorist activity ideology practice objective and subjective factors determination interval dialectics mechanism of terrorist activity

Information Text

Authors:

1. Crimea branch of the Krasnodar University of the MIA of Russia (the department of criminal law and criminology, lecturer of the department)
from 01.01.2023 until now
Simferopol, Simferopol, Russian Federation

Type:

Article

Pages:

from 22 to 32

Status:

Published

Subject area:

VAK Russia 5.3.9
UDC 343.92

Language:

Russian

Keywords:

terrorist activity, ideology, practice, objective and subjective factors, determination, interval dialectics, mechanism of terrorist activity

Funding

This publication has been prepared as a part of the grant of the State Council of the Republic of Crimea to young scientists of the Republic of Crimea.

Text

Text (PDF): Read Download

References

1. Avdeev, Yu. I. (2000). Terrorizm kak social'no-politicheskoe yavlenie. V E. I. Stepanov (otv. red.), Sovremennyj terrorizm: sostoyanie i perspektivy (str. 36–53). Moskow: Editorial URSS.

2. Bajrak, G. F. (2003). Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie problemy bor'by s terrorizmom: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov-on-Don.

3. Gorbunov, K. G. (2012). Terrorizm: istoriya i sovremennost': social'no-psihologicheskoe issledovanie. Moskow: Forum.

4. Grigor'ev, P. E., Ignatov, A. N. (2016). Vliyanie geliogeofizicheskih faktorov na osobennosti terroristicheskoj aktivnosti. Prostranstvo i Vremya, 1–2(23–24), 252–256.

5. Dikaev, S. U. (2004). Terrorizm: fenomen, obuslovlennost' i mery protivodejstviya: Ugolovno-pravovoe i kriminologicheskoe issledovanie: dis. ... doktora yurid. nauk. Saint Petersburg.

6. Ignatov, A. N. (2010). Biologicheskie faktory determinacii prestupnogo povedeniya: postanovka problemy. Forum prava, 4, 402–412.

7. Ignatov, A. N. (2015). Strast' kak fundamental'naya sostavlyayushchaya motiva prestupnogo povedeniya. Obshchestvo i pravo, 1 (51), 63–68.

8. Ignatov, A. N., Grigor'ev, P. E. (2016). Vliyanie geliogeofizicheskih faktorov na sostoyanie prestupnosti. Obshchestvo i pravo, 2 (56), 189–196.

9. Il'yanovich, E. B. (2016). Tekhnogennaya civilizaciya: osnovnye rakursy konceptualizacii ponyatiya. Nauchnyj vestnik Kryma, 2 (2).

10. Il'yanovich, E. B. (2020). Transgumanisticheskij scenarij chelovecheskogo budushchego: konceptualizaciya klyuchevyh ponyatij. V O. A. Gabrielyan (gl. red.), Prakticheskaya filosofiya: sostoyanie i perspektivy: sbornik materialov III nauchnoj konferencii (Simferopol', 17-18 maya 2020 g., str. 33–36). Simferopol': Izdatel'stvo Tipografiya «Arial».

11. Kel'bas, N. (2015). Deterministskij podhod k ocenke mezhdunarodnogo prestupleniya terrorizma. Moskow: Vysshaya shkola.

12. Kudryashova, I. V. (2018). Religioznyj terrorizm: Konceptual'nye problemy politicheskogo analiza. Politicheskaya nauka, 4, 54–68, https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2018.04.03 57

13. Lazarev, F. V. (2019). Istina i struktura real'nosti. Osnovy interval'noj metodologii. Simferopol': IT «ARIAL».

14. Mishin, Yu. D., Kochnev, E. A. (2015). Aktual'nost' ispol'zovaniya sochetaniya sistemnogo i dialekticheskogo podhodov v ponimanii terrorizma. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 10 (60), 118–123.

15. Nikitin, A. V. (2003). Terrorizm kak forma deviantnogo povedeniya: Kriminologicheskij aspekt: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Saint Petersburg.

16. Ol'shanskij, D. V. (2002). Psihologiya terrorizma. Saint Petersburg: Piter.

17. Yablokov, I. N. (2011). Ponyatie i funkcii religii. Gosudarstvo, religiya, cerkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom, 29 (1), 204–211.

18. Fukuyama, F. (2000, March 15). The Trouble with Names. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2000/03/15/the-trouble-with-names/

19. Persinger, M. A. (1997). Geomagnetic variables and behavior: Lxxxiii. Increased geomagnetic activity and group aggression in chronic limbic epileptic male rats. Percept. Mot. Skills, 85 (3 Pt 2), 1376–1378. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.85.3f.1376. PMID: 9450296

20. Sterman, J. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44827001_Business_Dynamics_System_Thinking_and_Modeling_for_a_Complex_World

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

General characterisation of the determinational complex of terrorist activity

Confirmation

Регистрация