ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN THE TRADITIONAL ALGORITHM OF RISK FORMATION IN THE TRANSHUMANISTIC CONCEPT

Artur Arakelyan; Yulia Vorontsova

doi:doi:10.55186/2413046X_2024_9_3_165

VAK Russia 5.2.1 UDC 005

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN THE TRADITIONAL ALGORITHM OF RISK FORMATION IN THE TRANSHUMANISTIC CONCEPT

Published в MOSCOW ECONOMIC JOURNAL · Volume 9, Issue 3, 2024 · Pages 542–555 · Rubrics: Economic theory

DOI 10.55186/2413046X_2024_9_3_165

Received: 12.04.2024 Accepted: 12.04.2024 Published: 01.05.2024

Authors

Artur Arakelyan ¹ · Yulia Vorontsova ²

1 State University of Management (department Management in the sphere of culture, cinema, TV and the entertainment industry, Head of the Department)
Moscow, Russian Federation

2 FGBOU VO «Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya» (kafedra «Upravlenie v sfere kul'tury, kino, TV i industrii razvlecheniy», docent)
Russian Federation

ABSTRACT

The research presented in the article is aimed at finding an intermediate approach that provides solutions related to the introduction of innovations offered by transhumanists. In connection with evolutionary anthropology, transhumanism supports technological development as a continuation of biological evolution. For transhumanists, the exponential growth of technology becomes an indispensable condition for the improvement of society, which, having reached a state beyond biology, will shape a new future for humanity: postbiological. The authors explore the possibility of predicting transhumanistic risks using integrated tools, taking into account the ethical component.

KEYWORDS

analysis algorithm risks singularity transhumanism

Information Text

Authors:

1. State University of Management (department Management in the sphere of culture, cinema, TV and the entertainment industry, Head of the Department)

Moscow, Russian Federation

2. FGBOU VO «Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya» (kafedra «Upravlenie v sfere kul'tury, kino, TV i industrii razvlecheniy», docent)

Russian Federation

Type:

Article

Pages:

from 542 to 555

Status:

Published

Subject area:

VAK Russia 5.2.1
UDC 005

Language:

Russian

Keywords:

analysis, algorithm, risks, singularity, transhumanism

Text

Text (PDF): Read Download

References

1. Voroncova, Yu.V. (2022). Konceptual'nye osnovy sozdaniya i ispol'zovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta. Monografiya / Yu.V. Voroncova. – M.: RUSAYNS – 156 s.

2. Bostrom, N. (2011). Una Historia del Pensamiento Transhumanista Argumentos de la Razón // Técnica №14, 157-191.

3. Buchanan, A. (2011). Beter tan Human. The promise and Perils of Enhacing Ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 256 p.

4. Diéguez, A. (2021). Cuerpos inadecuados. El desafío transhumanista a la filosofía, Barcelona, España: Herder, 216 p.

5. Diéguez, A. (2017). Transhumanismo. La búsqueda tecnológica del mejoramiento humano, Barcelona: Herder, 243 p.

6. Kurzweil, R. (2012). La Singularidad está cerca. Berlín: Lola Books, 656 p.

7. Linares, J. (2019). Adiós a la naturaleza. La revolución bioartefactual. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés, 334 p.

8. Lumbreras, S. (2020). Respuestas al transhumanismo. Cuerpo, autencidad y sentido. Madrid: Digital Reasons, 202 p.

9. Minsky, M. (1996). Máquinas Inteligentes. En La tercera cultura. Más allá de la revolución científica. Ed., John Brockman, 143-156. Barcelona: Tusquets Editors, 392 p.

10. Moravec, H. (1993). El hombre mecánico. El future de la robótica ya inteligencia humana. Barcelona: Salvat, 266 p.

11. Ortega y Gasset, J. (2004). Obras Completas (Complete Works, in Spanish). Madrid, España: Revista de Occidente.

12. Riesgos y desafíos del transhumanismo: perspectivas antropológicas y bioéticas / Jonny Alexánder García Echeverri ... [et al.]; editado por Jonny Alexánder García Echeverri; Víctor Hugo Gómez Yepes; prólogo de Rubén Revello. -1ª ed.- Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Universidad Católica Argentina, 2022, 356 p.

13. Savulescu, J. (2012) ¿Decisiones peligrosas?: Una bioética desafiante. Tecnos, - Science - 344 p.

14. Sibilia, P. (2009). El hombre postorgánico. Cuerpo, subjetividad y tecnologías digitales. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 209 p.

15. Villarroel, R. (2015). Consideraciones bioéticas y biopolíticas acerca del transhumanismo. El debate entorno a una possible experiencia posthumana. Revista de Filosofía, 71, pp. 177-190.

16. Vorontsova, Yu., Gil Martínez, M.A. & Arakelyan, A. (2022). Risk Management Concept: Predictive Assessment in Transhumanistic Space. WISDOM - Special Issue 1(2), Philosophical Issues of Economics, 166-174.

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN THE TRADITIONAL ALGORITHM OF RISK FORMATION IN THE TRANSHUMANISTIC CONCEPT

Confirmation

Регистрация