Russian Federation
from 01.01.2023 to 01.01.2024
Moscow, Russian Federation
23/28
10
This article examines the meaning of faith and revelation in the context of a fundamental change in the main approaches to the analysis of the phenomenon of being in modern philosophy and the transformation of scientific criteria. The authors agree with the justification of criticism of classical philosophy and complement it with additional arguments. In particular, the problems of classical idealistic ontology in the context of Christian-Platonic theistic synthesis are indicated. At the same time, the opinion is expressed that the path to rethinking European metaphysics may not follow the path of methodological atheism in phenomenology or postmodern negation. The authors propose a path that can be taken between the Scylla of the problematics of Christian-Platonic ontology and the Charybdis of Heideggerian “methodological atheism” through an original understanding of the category “givenness” in an ontological perspective. In conclusion, this issue is supplemented by the experience of justifying the significance of faith and revelation in the context of the criterion of falsifiability, which allows us to take a fresh look at both the path of classical religious metaphysics and the experiences of its critical rethinking in the 20th century.
being, ontology, Plato, Parmenides, Heidegger, givenness, phenomenology, postmodernity, death of God
1. Gaginskij, A. M. (2023) Bytie i dannost' v filosofii M. Hajdeggera [Being and givenness in the philosophy of M. Heidegger], Filosofskaja mysl', no. 10, pp. 93-105. (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2023.10.44016; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MVTZML
2. Kazakov, M. Sub’ektivnyj idealizm v postneklassicheskoj nauke [Subjective idealism in post-non-classical science]. URL: https://proza.ru/2012/08/13/1378 (in Russ.)
3. Molchanov, V.I. (2007) Issledovanija po fenomenologii soznanija [Research on the phenomenology of consciousness]. Moskva: Territorija budushhego. (in Russ.) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RAYVYX
4. Nizhnikov, S. A. (2014) Mertv li Bog? M. Hajdegger o nigilizme i metafizike [Is God Dead? M. Heidegger on nihilism and metaphysics], Prostranstvo i Vremja, no. 2 (16), pp. 57-62. (in Russ.) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SJEFWB
5. Rostova, M. M. (2016) Vlijanie filosofii M. Hajdeggera na fenomen smerti Boga v teologii [The influence of M. Heidegger’s philosophy on the phenomenon of the death of God in theology], Filosofija i kul'tura, no. 3, pp. 385-397. (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/1999-2793.2016.3.15090; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WAZCKF
6. Hajdegger, M. Pis'mo o gumanizme [Letter on Humanism]. URL: https://phil.ulstu.ru/files/studentam/2.2_haid_hum.pdf (in Russ.)
7. Chekrygin, O.V., Mezentsev, I.V., Nadeina, D.A. (2024) Kritika logiki gipotez dialoga «Parmenid» i formirovanie novoj ontologicheskoj perspektivy [Criticism of the logic of the hypotheses of the Parmenides dialogue and the formation of a new ontological perspective], Teologija: teorija i praktika, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 79-95. (in Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2949-3951-2024-0050; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RHSRYF
8. Jannaras, H. Hajdegger i Areopagit, ili ob otsutstvii i nepoznavaemosti Boga [Heidegger and the Areopagite, or about the absence and unknowability of God]. URL: https://predanie.ru/book/73494-haydegger-i-areopagit-ili-ob-otsutstvii-i-nepoznavaemosti-boga/ (in Russ.)
