Questions of counteraction of corruption are extremely actual now as, according to researchers, corruption is one of threats of national security. Corruption gets extensively lives of the Russian society and becomes the phenomenon in many respects defining political, economic and cultural development of the Russian society. The most dangerous corruption crime by right is considered taking of a bribe. In spite of the fact that this crime is known to the criminal legislation long ago and is very widespread in practice, a number of questions of its qualification дискуссионен so far and causes disputes among scientists. In particular, it concerns a subject of taking of a bribe. In relation to a subject of a bribe of the criminal code of Russian Federation uses the unsuccessful formulations which are badly corresponding to provisions of the existing civil legislation on objects of the civil rights; legally „forgets“ about such potential subjects of a bribe as results of works, the protected results of intellectual activity and means of an individualization equated to them (intellectual property), the non-material benefits; proceeds only from property character of a bribe, i.e. the bribe is always obliged to have a monetary assessment which has to be covered by intention of her recipient. It is represented that ripened need of improvement of standards of the criminal code of Russian Federation.
bribe, bribe-taking, crime target, property-related services
1. Kachalov V. V. Obschestvennaya antikorrupcionnaya ekspertiza zakonodatel'stva kak element sistemy zaschity prav grazhdan ot korrupcii // Bezopasnost' biznesa. 2012. № 3. S. 2-4.
2. Plohov S. V. Sistema mer protivodeystviya korrupcionnoy prestupnosti v social'noy sfere // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 1 (24). S. 56-62.
3. Maslakova E. A. Korrupciya v organah mestnogo samoupravleniya: kriminologicheskie aspekty // Municipal'naya sluzhba: aktual'nye problemy. 2013. № 4. S. 24-26.
4. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve i ob inyh korrupcionnyh prestupleniyah: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 9 iyulya 2013 g. № 24 // Ros. gaz. 2013. 17 iyulya.
5. Kachalov V. V. Terminologiya kriminologii: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya // Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta MVD Rossii. 2014. № 10. S. 82-84.
6. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve, kommercheskom podkupe i inyh korrupcionnyh prestupleniyah: proekt postanovleniya Plenuma Verhonogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 5.
7. Zhilkin M. G. Novelly ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za vzyatochnichestvo // Aktual'nye problemy protivodeystviya korrupcii v sovremennyh usloviyah: materialy mezhvedom. nauch.-prakt. konf. (21 marta 2012 g.). Ruza, 2012. S. 61-65.
8. Yani P. Voprosy kvalifikacii vzyatochnichestva // Zakonnost'. 2013. № 3. S. 18.
9. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «O protivodeystvii korrupcii» (postat.) Besplatnaya elektron. biblioteka. URL: http://modernlib.ru (data obrascheniya: 10.03.2015).
10. Volzhenkin B. V. Sluzhebnye prestupleniya. M., 2000.
11. Klepickiy I. A., Rezanov V. I. Poluchenie vzyatki v ugolovnom prave Rossii. Kommentariy zakonodatel'stva. M., 2001. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
12. Brazhnik F., Tolkachenko A. Nekotorye aktual'nye voprosy kvalifikacii polucheniya vzyatki // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2000. № 1. S. 7-11.
13. Volkonskaya E. K. O korystnom motive korrupcionnyh prestupleniy // Aktual'nye problemy protivodeystviya korrupcii v sovremennyh usloviyah: materialy mezhvedom. nauch.-prakt. konf. (21 marta 2012 g.). Ruza, 2012.
14. Hodeev F., Shutenko T. Vzyatka kak potrebnost' // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. № 4.
15. Third Evaluation Round. Evaluation Report on the Russian Federation Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2). (Theme I). Adopted by GRECO at its 54th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 20-23 March 2012).
16. Third Evaluation Round. Compliance Report on the Russian Federation. Adopted by GRECO at its 64th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 16-20 June 2014).
17. Yani P. Novoe Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda o vzyatochnichestve // Zakonnost'. 2013. № 10. S. 25-30.
18. Poyasneniya rabochey gruppy k nekotorym polozheniyam proekta postanovleniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 5. S. 78-79.
19. Mal'cev V. V., Strilec O. V. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii: dostizheniya, problemy i perspektivy // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 4 (27).
20. Dineka V. I. Dolzhnostnye prestupleniya po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii: monogr. / pod red. N. I. Vetrova. Stavropol', 1999.
21. Sharapov R., Farberova L. Nezakonnoe okazanie uslug imuschestvennogo haraktera kak predmet vzyatochnichestva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. № 2. S. 88-95.
