The article analyzes the peculiarities of causation in crimes committed by several persons who drive vehicles while violating the rules of the road and who are participants in one road accident. The author examines various existing views on this issue, gives and analyzes examples of judicial practice in criminal cases. The study allowed to identify various options for the development of causation, depending on whose actions were the cause of the outcome. These consequences belong to the General (final) results of violations committed by two or more participants of road accident (mutual fault). Violation of the rules made by individuals, which did not affect the development of causation and the consequences occurred solely due to violation of the rules by one of the participants of the movement. In the first case, criminal responsibility to all persons who have committed a violation of traffic regulations of the Russian Federation; in the latter, only those whose irregularities are in a causal relationship with the come consequences; in the latter, only the person whose violation is a reason for the connection with the ensuing consequences.
causal relationship, the rules of the road, a traffic offense, the person driving the vehicle, sopraceneri, mutual fault
1. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyah, svyazannyh s narusheniem pravil dorozhnogo dvizheniya i ekspluatacii transportnyh sredstv, a takzhe s ih nepravomernym zavladeniem bez celi hischeniya: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 9 dekabrya 2008 g. № 25 (red. ot 24.05.2016). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
2. Procenko S. V. Ustanovlenie prichinnoy svyazi v processe kvalifikacii transportnogo prestupleniya // Yuridicheskiy mir. 2010. № 7. C. 59.
3. Postanovlenie o prekraschenii ugolovnogo presledovaniya ot 8 oktyabrya 2015 g. po ugolovnomu delu № 138112 g. // Arhiv UMVD Rossii po g. Volzhskomu Volgogradskoy oblasti.
4. Opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 17 fevralya 2015 g. № 50-UD14-9 po prigovoru Oktyabr'skogo rayonnogo suda g. Omska ot 1 oktyabrya 2013 goda po ugolovnomu delu po ch. 3 st. 264 UK RF v otnoshenii Pozdnyakova i Mihaylova. URL http://zakoniros.ru (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2017).
5. Pikurov N. I. Kvalifikaciya transportnyh prestupleniy: nauch.-prakt. posobie. M.: RAP, 2011.
6. Prigovor Kimrskogo gorodskogo suda Tverskoy oblasti ot 28 yanvarya 2014 goda po delu № 1-1/2014 (1-156/2013) v otnoshenii Kamchatkina, obvinyaemogo v sovershenii prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo ch. 3 st. 264 UK RF, i Baloga, obvinyaemogo v sovershenii prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo ch. 2 st. 268 UK RF. URL: https://rospravosudie.com (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2017).
