In article questions of differentiation of penal and administratively punishable organization of illegal migration and also qualification of this act under the Article 322.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation as the uniform, continued crime and on set with other structures on the basis of materials of judicial practice of various regions of the Russian Federation are considered. The author comes to a conclusion that most often the organization of illegal migration is expressed in granting the equipped (well-planned) housing (rooms for accommodation) and in execution of the notice of arrival in the place of stay where the foreign citizen will obviously not stay as the premises actually are not provided to it. Introduction of Article 322.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation incorporated a part of the objective party of the organization of illegal migration. Proceeding from it if the person carried out the organization of illegal migration interfaced to providing work or housing to foreign citizens or persons without citizenship and then their fictitious registration, then imputation of set of Articles 322.1 and 322.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is required. Such legal assessment follows from rules of qualification as fictitious registration does not cover other actions on the organization of illegal stay. The author offers options of interpretation of the estimated concepts which are available in Article 322.1 of the Criminal Code.
the organization of illegal migration, fictitious registration, the uniform continued crime, qualification
1. Filippov P. A. Organizaciya nezakonnoy migracii: praktika primeneniya st. 322.1 UK RF i novelly zakonodatel'stva // Analiticheskiy portal «Otrasli-prava.rf». URL: http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/3360 (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2018).
2. Prigovor Pushkinskogo gorodskogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti ot 11 iyulya 2013 g. po delu № 1305/2013 v otnoshenii Nikanorova A.S.; Prigovory Pushkinskogo gorodskogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti ot 9 iyulya 2013 g. po delu № 1-297/2013 v otnoshenii K., ot 9 iyulya 2013 g. № 1-304/2013 v otnoshenii K. // Analiticheskiy portal «Otrasli-prava.rf». URL: http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/ 3360 (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2018).
3. Prigovor Vahitovskogo rayonnogo suda g. Kazani ot 3 noyabrya 2011 g. po delu № 1-521/2011 v otnoshenii A.; Prigovor Kolpinskogo rayonnogo suda Sankt-Peterburga ot 4 iyunya 2013 g. po delu № 1-224/13 v otnoshenii B. // Analiticheskiy portal «Otrasli-prava.rf». URL: http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/3360 (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2018).
4. Prigovor № 1-145/2015 ot 18 marta 2015 g. Industrial'nogo rayonnogo suda g. Permi Permskogo kraya // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF. UR: http://sudact.ru (data obrascheniya 15.01.2018).
5. Postanovlenie № 4U/6-6670 4U-6670/2014 ot 23 yanvarya 2015 g. Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF. UR: http:// sudact.ru (data obrascheniya 15.01.2018).
6. Prigovor Michurinskogo gorodskogo suda Tambovskoy oblasti № 1-321/2014 ot 23 sentyabrya 2014 g. // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF. UR: http://sudact.ru (data obrascheniya 15.01.2018).
7. Prigovor № 1-214/2015 ot 18 fevralya 2015 g. Central'nogo rayonnogo suda g. Novokuznecka // Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF. UR: http:// sudact.ru (data obrascheniya 15.01.2018).
8. Prigovor Gorodeckogo gorodskogo suda Nizhegorodskoy oblasti ot 27 noyabrya 2013 g. v otnoshenii Soborova N.D. // GAS RF «Pravosudie». URL: http://www.sudrf.ru (data obrascheniya 15.01.2018).
9. Prigovor Kotovskogo gorodskogo suda Nizhegorodskoy oblasti ot 27 noyabrya 2013 g. po delu № 1-283/2013 v otnoshenii Muralevoy N. E. // GAS RF «Pravosudie». URL: http://www.sudrf.ru (data obrascheniya 15.01.2018).
10. Prigovor Zhukovskogo rayonnogo suda Kaluzhskoy oblasti ot 28 marta 2016 g. po delu № 1-207/2016 v otnoshenii Nalivayko A. A. // GAS RF «Pravosudie». URL: http://www.sudrf.ru (data obrascheniya 15.01.2018).
11. Vlasov Yu. A., Mihal' O. A. Kvalifikaciya nezakonnoy migracii. M., 2017.
12. Prigovory Horoshevskogo rayonnogo suda goroda Moskvy ot 6 sentyabrya 2013 g. v otnoshenii M., ot 20 sentyabrya 2013 g. po delu № 1-474/2013 g. v otnoshenii S., ot 3 dekabrya 2013 g. po delu № 1-585/2013 g. v otnoshenii L., ot 19 dekabrya 2013 g. po delu № 1-635/2013 g. v otnoshenii S. // Analiticheskiy portal «Otrasli-prava.rf». URL: http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/3360 (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2018).
13. Prigovor Mytischinskogo gorodskogo suda ot 11 aprelya 2013 g. v otnoshenii Dasaeva; Prigovor Mytischinskogo gorodskogo suda ot 24 aprelya 2013 g. v otnoshenii Holodkova; Prigovor Schelkovskogo gorodskogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti ot 28 marta 2013 g. po delu № 1-190/2013 v otnoshenii Hadzha // Analiticheskiy portal «Otrasli-prava.rf». URL: http://otrasli-prava.rf/ article/3360 (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2018).
14. Prigovor Basmannogo rayonnogo suda goroda Moskvy ot 31 oktyabrya 2013 g. v otnoshenii Karnauhovoy I.I. // Analiticheskiy portal «Otrasli-prava.rf». URL: http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/ 3360 (data obrascheniya: 15.01.2018).
15. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obschaya chast' / pod red. N. F. Kuznecovoy, I. M. Tyazhkovoy. M., 2004.
16. Naumov A. V. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: kurs lekciy. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. T. 1: Obschaya chast'. M., 2008.
17. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o hischeniyah gosudarstvennogo i obschestvennogo imuschestva: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda SSSR ot 11 iyulya 1972 g. № 4. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
18. Prigovor ot 13 maya 2014 g. // Arhiv sudebnogo uchastka № 103 Novovarshavskogo sudebnogo rayona Omskoy oblasti.
19. Korneeva A. V. Teoreticheskie osnovy kvalifikacii prestupleniy: ucheb. posobie. M., 2006.
20. Polnyy kurs ugolovnogo prava / pod red. A. I. Korobeeva. SPb., 2008. T. 1.
