ANALYSIS OF METHODS OF QUALITATIVE EVALUATION OF SOFTWARE COMPLEXITY
Authors:
1.
Ferganskiy filial Tashkentskogo universiteta informacionnyh tehnologiy im. Muhammada al-Horazmiy
Fergana, Uzbekistan
Fergana, Uzbekistan
2.
Ferganskiy filial Tashkentskogo universiteta informacionnyh tehnologiy im. Muhammada al-Horazmiy
Fergana, Uzbekistan
Fergana, Uzbekistan
Type:
Сonference article
Published:
22.12.2018
Subject area:
62
50.51
302
5136
50.51
302
5136
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
labor, complexity, accuracy, function points, metrics, code volume, external inputs, external outputs
Abstract (English):
The article analyzes the methods used for qualitative assessment of software complexity.
The article analyzes the methods used for qualitative assessment of software complexity.
Keywords:
labor, complexity, accuracy, function points, metrics, code volume, external inputs, external outputs
labor, complexity, accuracy, function points, metrics, code volume, external inputs, external outputs
1. Boehm V. Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II. NewJersey, Prentice-Hall, 1981.
2. Royce W. Software project management: a unified framework. Reading, Addison-Wesley Professional, 1998.
3. Boehm B. Software engineering economics. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1981.
4. Fenton N. Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, London, Chapman and Hall, 1991.
5. Parkinson G. Parkinson’s Law and Other Studies in Administration NY, Houghton-Miffin, 1962.
6. Halstead M. Elements of software science, NY, Elsevier, 1977.
7. Albrecht J., Gaffney J.E. Software function, source lines of codes, and development effort prediction: a software science validation, IEEE Trans Software Eng. SE-9, 1983. P 639-648.
