, Russian Federation
BISAC MAT042000 Optimization
This paper is devoted to comparative analysis of numerical methods accuracy. Comparative estimation of accuracy is performed for numerical methods presented as solvers integrated to open sotware package OpenFOAM. Three different OpenFOAM solvers are selected to numerically solve the problem of supersonic flow around a cone. The angle of attack, cone half-angle and Mach number were varied in the selected ranges with a certain step. This approach is implemented using a generalized computational experiment that allows, based on parallel technologies, the simultaneous solution of the same basic problem with different input parameters. A number of test calculations were carried out. The deviation fields of gas-dynamic quantities for all solvers are analyzed. The construction of a generalized computational experiment made it possible to compare the accuracy of the considered solvers not only for one, separately taken problem, but for a class of problems specified by the ranges of variation of the determining parameters. Such an assessment of accuracy can be very useful for users of the software package when choosing a solver. Also, the results obtained can be useful for solver developers.
comparative analysis of accuracy, compressible flow, supersonic flow, OpenFOAM
1. Bondarev A.E., Kuvshinnikov A.E. Comparative study of the accuracy for OpenFOAM solvers. - 2017 Ivannikov ISPRAS Open Conference (ISPRAS), Moscow, pp. 132-136, 2017.
2. Bondarev A.E., Kuvshinnikov A.E. Analysis of the accuracy of OpenFOAM solvers for the problem of supersonic flow around a cone. - In: Shi Y. et al. (eds) Computational Science - ICCS 2018. ICCS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10862. Springer, Cham, 2018.
3. Krasil'shchikov A.P., Gur'yashkin L.P. Eksperimental'nye issledovaniya tel vrashcheniya v giperzvukovykh potokakh. [Experimental investigations of bodies of rotation in hypersonic flows]. - Moscow: FIZMATLIT, 2007. [In Russian]
4. OpenFOAM Foundation. [Online]. Available: http://www.openfoam.org.
5. Kurganov A., Tadmor E. New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection-diffusion equations. // J. Comput. Phys., vol. 160, pp. 241-282, 2000.
6. Greenshields C.J., Weller H.G., Gasparini L., Reese J.M. Implementation of semi-discrete, non-staggered central schemes in a colocated, polyhedral, finite volume framework, for high-speed viscous flows. // Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2010.
7. Issa R. Solution of the implicit discretized fluid flow equations by operator splitting. // J. Comput. Phys., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 40-65, 1986.
8. Kraposhin M., Bovtrikova A., Strijhak S. Adaptation of Kurganov-Tadmor numerical scheme for applying in combination with the PISO method in numerical simulation of flows in a wide range of Mach numbers. // Procedia Computer Science, vol. 66, pp. 43-52, 2015.
9. Babenko K.I., Voskresenskii G.P., Lyubimov A.N., Rusanov V.V. Prostranstvennoe obtekanie gladkikh tel ideal'nym gazom, [Three-dimensional ideal gas flow past smooth bodies]. - Moscow: Nauka, 1964. [In Russian]
10. Karvatskii A.Ya., Pulinets I.V., Lazarev T.V., Pedchenko A.Yu. Chislennoe modelirovanie sverkhzvukovogo obtekaniya klina s primeneniem svobodnogo otkrytogo programmnogo koda. [Numerical modelling of supersonic flow around a wedge with the use of free open software code OpenFOAM]. - Space science and technology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 47-52, 2015. [In Russian]
11. Gutierrez L.F., Tamagno J.P., Elaskar S.A. High speed flow simulation using OpenFOAM. // Mecanica Computacional, vol. XXXI, Salta, Argentina, pp. 2939-2959, 2012.
12. Lorenzon D., Elaskar S.A. Simulacion de flujos supersonicos bidimensionales y axialmente simetricos con OpenFOAM. // Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 65-76, 2015.
