Moscow, Russian Federation
BISAC MAT029000 Probability & Statistics / General
The article considers the possibility of applying the theoretical concept of resilience to the optimization of activities to improve the resilience of organizations. For this purpose, various approaches to the concept of resilience and its practical implementation are analyzed. The generalizing point for these approaches is the understanding of resilience as the degree of readiness to respond adequately to unforeseen events and circumstances. Thus for organizations, resilience is cognate to risk management. In order to optimize costs, the analysis of the relation between these types of activities was carried out. Based on the definition of resilience as a component of risk management, a multi-level approach to optimizing the cost of improving the resilience of organizations is proposed. In this approach, the most effective measures to improve resilience are selected end-to-end, while increasing the scope of the task consistently: from the level of specific activities to the analysis of interactions between organizations. This reduces the impact of uncertainty on risk-based decisions by maximizing consideration of factors and boundary conditions.
organizational resilience, risk management, cost-benefit analysis
1. Alexander D.E. Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2013 g., T. 13.
2. Holling C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Ann.Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1973 g., T. 4.
3. Chandler D. Resilience: The governance of complexity. N.Y: Routledge., 2014.
4. ISO 22313:2020 Security and resilience - Business continuity management systems - Guidance on the use of ISO 22301.
5. Hornborg A. Zero-sum world: challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-System. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 2009 g., 50.
6. UNISDR. Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva.: b.n., 2009.
7. Linnenluecke M.K. Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2017 g., T. 19.1.
8. XIAO L., CAO H. Organizational Resilience: The Theoretical Model and Research Implication. ITM Web of Conferences. 2017 g.
9. Rose A., Krausmann E. An economic framework for the development of a resilience index for business recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. Elsevier., 2013 g., T. 5.
10. Lengnick-Hall C. A., Beck T. E., & Lengnick-Hall. Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review. 2011 g., T. 21, 3.
11. Bruneau M., Chang S.E. et. al. A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities. Earthquake Spectra. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute., 2003 g., T. 19.
12. Park J., Seager T., et. al. Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems. Risk Analysis. 2013 g., T. 33.
13. Linkov I., Trump B.D., Hynes W. Resilience-based Strategies and Policies to Address Systemic Risks. SG/NAEC. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development., 2019 g., T. 5.
14. Eisenberg D.A., Linkov I., Park J., Bates M.E., Fox-Lent C., Seager T.P. Resilience Metrics: Lessons from Military Doctrines. Solutions for a sustainable and desirable future. 2014 g., T. 5, 5.
15. Ganin A.A., Massaro E., Gutfraind A., Steen N., Keisler J.M., Kott A., Mangoubi R., Linkov I. Operational resilience: concepts, design and analysis. Scientific reports. 2016 g., PMC4726063.
16. Gillespie-Marthaler, L., Nelson K., Baroud H., Abkowitz M. Selecting Indicators for Assessing Community Sustainable Resilience. Risk Analysis. 2019 g., T. 39, 11.
17. ISO 31000:2018 (E). Second edition. Risk management - Guidelines.
18. NUREG-75/014. WASH-1400 The Reactor Safety Study. The Introduction of Risk Assessment to the Regulation of Nuclear Reactors. Manuscript Completed: August 2016 Date Published: August 2016. Prepared by: Reynold Bartel. 60 p.
19. Proag V. The concept of vulnerability and resilience. ScienceDirect. Elsevier., 2014 g., T. 18.
20. Białas A. Cost-benefits aspects in risk-management. Polish Journal of Management Studies. 2016, T.13, 1.
21. Hugenbusch D., Neumann T. Cost-Benefit analysis of disaster risk reduction. Executive Summary. b.m. : Aktion Deutschland Hilft e.V., 2016.
22. https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/uk/news/breaking-news/revealed-civil-liability-insurer-of-two-notredame-de-paris-contractors-165074.aspx
23. ICRP, 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 [2-4].
24. Sachenko L., Amelina M. Corporate insured strategies. Moscow: Ankil, 2015, 179 p.
25. Proag S.-L., Proag V. The cost benefit analysis of providing resilience. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2014 g., T. 18.
26. Mechler R. and. The Risk to Resilience Study Team. The Cost-Benefit Analysis Methodology, From Risk to Resilience Working Paper No. 1. Kathmandu, Nepal: eds. Moench, M., Caspari, E. & A. Pokhrel, ISET, ISET-Nepal and ProVention., 2008.
