Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Medical intervention is often associated with some harm to the patient’s health. At the same time, the very concept of “harm to health” does not mean the wrongfulness of a doctor’s act. The inevitable harm to health, without which medical intervention itself is impossible, is legitimate when there is the consent of the patient. The risk of causing more than unavoidable harm to health also requires consent and compliance with reasonable risk conditions. Harm to health, the infliction of which could not be foreseen, is an accident. Accident — innocent harm that does not imply criminal prosecution. Outside of consent, harm to health can be done legitimately in an emergency.

Keywords:
harm to health, inevitability, risk, chance, extreme need
References

1. Ugolovnyy kodeks: Federal'nyy zakon ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF. 1996. № 25. St. 2954.

2. Grazhdanskiy kodeks: Federal'nyy zakon ot 31.11.1994 № 51-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF. 2011. № 32. St. 3301.

3. Ob osnovah ohrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federacii: Federal'nyy zakon ot 21.11.2011 № 323-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel'stva RF. 2011. № 48. St. 6724.

4. Enciklopedicheskiy slovar' medicinskih terminov: v 3-h t. / Pod red. B.V. Petrovskogo. M.: Sovetskaya enciklopediya. T. 2. 1984. 448 s.

5. Al'shevskiy V.V. Metodika sudebno-medicinskogo issledovaniya pri proizvodstve ekspertiz v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve po delam o prichinenii vrachom vreda zdorov'yu pacienta (Soobschenie 3) // Medicinskoe pravo. 2018. 6(82). S. 21–26.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?