Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
GRNTI 27.43 Теория вероятностей и математическая статистика
OKSO 01.04.02 Прикладная математика и информатика
BBK 221 Математика
TBK 611 Математика
It is shown that when performing operational control procedures that ensure the routine operation of hierarchical systems, the task of maintaining controllability is reduced to fulfilling the conditions for isomorphism of the set of its states and the set of control actions. With the implementation of hierarchical management at the tactical and strategic levels, proceeding under conditions of in-complete certainty, the probability of a positive feedback objectively increases, which can lead to a further increase in uncertain-ty and, ultimately, to a loss of control.
uncertainty, messages, residual uncertainty of messages, hierarchical systems
1. Harkevich A.A. O cennosti informacii. // V sb.: Problemy kibernetiki. 1960. Vyp.4.
2. Golubkov E.P. Tehnologiya prinyatiya upravlencheskih resheniy / M.: Delo i servis. 2005. 544s.
3. Podinovskiy V.V., Nogin V.D. Pareto-optimal'nye resheniya mnogokriterial'nyh zadach. M.: Nauka, 1982. 431 s.
4. Anfilatov V.S., Emel'yanov A.A., Kukushkin A.A. Sistemnyy analiz v upravlenii. Uchebnoe posobie / M.: Finansy i statistika. 2005 - 367s.
5. Klimenko I.S. Teoriya sistem i sistemnyy analiz. / Uchebnoe posobie. - M.: RosNOU. 2014. 265 s..
6. Klimenko I.S., Belova N.., Sharapova L.V. K probleme opredeleniya cennosti informacii v usloviyah informacionnogo obschestva. // Vestnik Rossiyskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya «Slozhnye sistemy: modeli, analiz i upravlenie». 2018. № 2, s.54-62. .
7. Zavgorodniy V.I. Sistemnoe upravlenie informacionnymi riskami. Vybor mehanizmov zaschity. // Problemy upravleniya. 2009. №1. s.53-58.
8. Klimenko I.S., Korovko P.G., Sharapova L.V. K probleme ocenivaniya effektivnosti upravleniya i kachestva upravlencheskih resheniy // Vestnik Rossiyskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya «Slozhnye sistemy: modeli, analiz i upravlenie». 2017. № 1, s.53-57.
9. Klimenko I.S., Sharapova L.V. K probleme sistemnogo analiza telekommunikacionnyh processov. // Vestnik Rossiyskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya «Slozhnye sistemy: modeli, analiz i upravlenie». 2016. № 1-2. s.82-86. .
10. Habbard D. Kak izmerit' vse, chto ugodno. / M.: Olimp – Biznes, 2009. 320 s.
11. Ahmadeev D.R., Svadkovskiy V.A. Opredelenie cennosti informacii kak odin iz klyuchevyh faktorov informacionnoy bezopasnosti. // Myagkie izmereniya i vychisleniya. – 2018. №10. S.37-40.
12. Gubko M. V. Modeli i metody optimizacii struktury ierarhicheskih sistem obrabotki in-formacii: dis. ... d-r. fiz.-mat. nauk: 05.13.01. - Moskva, 2014.
13. Burkov V.N., Zalozhnev A.Yu., Novikov D.A. Teoriya grafov v upravlenii organizacionnymi sistemami. – M.: Sinteg, 2001.
14. Voronin A.A., Mishin S.P. Optimal'nye ierarhicheskie struktury. – M.: IPU RAN, 2003.
15. Voronin A.A., Mishin S.P. Modelirovanie struktury organizacionnoy sistemy. Ob algoritmah poiska optimal'nogo dereva // Vestn. Volg. un-ta. Ser. 1: Matematika. Fizika. – 2001. – S.78-98.
16. Voronin A.A., Mishin S.P. Model' optimal'nogo upravleniya strukturnymi izmeneniyami organizacionnoy sistemy // Avtomatika i telemehanika. – 2002. No8. – S.136-150.
17. Voronin A.A., Mishin S.P. Model' optimal'nogo upravleniya strukturnymi izmeneniyami organizacionnoy sistemy // Avtomatika i telemehanika. – 2002. No8. – S.136-150.
18. Voronin A.A., Mishin S.P. Optimal'nye ierarhicheskie struktury. – M.: IPU RAN, 2003.
19. Mishin S.P. Optimal'nye ierarhii upravleniya v ekonomicheskih sistemah. – M.: PMSOFT, 2004.
20. Mishin S.P. Optimal'noe stimulirovanie v mnogourovnevyh ierarhicheskih strukturah // Avtomatika i telemehanika. – 2004. No5. – S. 96-119.
21. Mishin S.P. Optimal'naya vetvistost' dlya stepennoy funkcii zatrat // Avtomatika i telemehanika. – 2006. No 8. – S. 154-168.
22. Mishin S.P. Optimal'nost' drevovidnoy ierarhii upravleniya s simmetrichnoy proizvodstvennoy linieĭ // Problemy upravleniya. – 2006. No6. – S. 36-42.
23. Mishin S. Optimal Organizational Hierarchies in Firms. – Moscow: Institute of Control Sciences, 2005.
24. Huffman D.A. A Method for the Construction of Minimum-Redundancy Codes // Proc. IRE. – 1952. – No.9. – P.1098–1101.
25. Burkov V.N., Goubko M.V., Korgin N.A., Novikov D.A. Integrated Mechanisms of Organizational Behavior Control // Advances in Systems Science and Application. 2013. Vol. 13. No 3. P. 217–225.
26. Parkhomenko P.P. Questionnaires and organizational hierarchies. Automation and Remote Control, 2010. No 71(6), P. 1124–1134.
27. Shannon C.E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication // Bell System Technical Journal. 1948. No 27. P. 379–423.
28. Bir S. Kibernetika i upravlenie proizvodstvom. – M.: Nauka, 1963.
29. Park S-J., Park G-L., ShinI-H. et al. Performance Evaluation of the Optimal Hierarchy for Cellular Networks // Y. Shi et al. (Eds.): ICCS 2007, Part 4, LNCS 4490, P. 449–456.
30. Sloan A.P., McDonald J. My years with General motors. Random House, Inc. 1990.
31. Chandler A.D. Jr. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962/1998.
32. Woodward J. Management and technology. – HMSO, 1958.
33. Mincberg G. Struktura v kulake: sozdanie effektivnoĭ organizacii. – M.: Piter, 2001.
34. Ashby W.R. An Introduction to Cybernetics. L.: Chapman & Hall, 1956.
35. Surina A.E. upravlenie innovacionnymi proektami s ispol'zovaniem podhoda U.R. Eshbi // nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti sankt-peterburgskogo.
36. Its A.E. The method of selection of the project manager taking into account t hecognitive competencies // Building of a professional culture of specialists of the XXI century in the technical University: collec-tion of proceedings. / SPbSPU – issue.
37. The era of innovation / Felix Jansen. – Trans. from English. – M: INFRA-M, 2002. – XII, 308 p. – (Series «Management for the leader»).
38. Silaev D.P., M.A. Gandzhur Yavlenie samoorganizacii i zakon neobhodimosti raznoobraziya U. R. Eshbi // Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2018. №59-4. S. 259-263.
39. Barannikov A.F., Teoriya organizacii. Uchebnik dlya vuzov, M., YuNITI-DANA. 2004. s. 189.
40. Gvishiani D.M., Organizaciya i upravlenie, M., Izd-vo MGTU im. N.E. Baumana. 1998g. S. 203.
41. Klimenko I.S. K interpretacii principa neobhodimogo raznoobraziya Eshbi primenitel'no k upravleniyu v social'no-ekonomicheskih sistemah // Vestnik Rossiyskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya «Slozhnye sistemy: modeli, analiz i upravlenie». 2012. Vyp. 4. S. 4.
42. Fraymann A.V. Ob osobennostyah primeneniya principa neobhodimogo raznoobraziya dlya otobrazheniya funkciy sistemnogo administratora // Vestnik Rossiyskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya «Slozhnye sistemy: modeli, analiz i upravlenie». 2019. № 2. S. 64–69.
43. Klimenko I.S., Korovko P.G., Sharapova L.V. K probleme ocenivaniya kachestva upravlencheskih resheniy i effektivnosti upravleniya // Vestnik Rossiyskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya «Slozhnye sistemy: modeli, analiz i upravlenie». 2017. Vyp. 1. S. 53–57.
44. Klimenko I.S., Sharapova L.V. Obschaya zadacha prinyatiya resheniya i fenomen neopredelennosti // Vestnik Rossiĭskogo novogo universiteta. Seriya «Slozhnye sistemy: modeli, analiz i upravlenie». 2019. Vyp. 3. S. 44–56.
45. Anfilatov V.S., Emel'yanov A.A., Kukushkin A.A. Sistemnyy analiz v upravlenii: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Finansy i statistika, 2005. 367 s.
46. Anthony R.N. Planning and Control: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.
