The Article is dedicated to the peculiarities of formation and development of the public sphere. We consider the three most progressive approaches to the origin and transformation of the public space - H. Arendt, R. Koselleck and J. Habermas. The comparative analysis of these concepts is being made.
public sphere, bourgeoisie, community, public opinion, society
1. Arendt A. Vita activa, ili O dejatel’noj zhizni/Per. s nem. i angl. V. V. Bibihina; Pod red. D. M. Nosova. - SPb.: Aletejja, - 2000 g. - 437 s
2. Kozellek R. Social’naja istorija i istorija ponjatij//Istoricheskie ponjatija i politicheskie idei v Rossii XVI-XX veka. - SPb: Aletejja, - 2006. - Vyp. 5, - S. 33-53
3. Benhabib S. From the Problem of Judgment To the Public Sphere: Rethinking Hannah Arendt’s Political Theory/S. Benhabib//The reluctant modernism of Hannah Arendt. - Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, - 1996. - P. 172-220
4. Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy/J. Habermas. - Cambridge: The MIT Press, - 1996. - 675 p
5. Habermas J. Further Reflections on the Public Sphere/C. Calhoun (eds.)//Habermas and the Public Sphere. - Cambridge, Mass: MIT, - 1992. - P. 421-461
6. Habermas J. The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedic Article//New German Critique, - 1974. - Vol. 3. - P. 49-55
7. Habermas J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere/J. Habermas. - Cambridge: The MIT Press, -1991. - 301 p
8. Koselleck R. Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society/R. Koselleck. - Cambridge: MIT Press, -1988. - 204 p
