Екатеринбург, Свердловская область, Россия
Екатеринбург, Свердловская область, Россия
Екатеринбург, Россия
сотрудник
Екатеринбург, Свердловская область, Россия
сотрудник
Екатеринбург, Свердловская область, Россия
Предмет. С появлением передовых технологий визуализации и CAD/CAM-технологий возможность управляемой хирургии стала вызывать широкий интерес среди имплантологов. Статья посвящена реабилитации стоматологического пациента посредством имплантации по хирургическому шаблону. Представлена информация о некоторых преимуществах и недостатках цифрового протокола по сравнению с традиционной дентальной имплантацией. Описаны основные этапы навигационной хирургической операции на клиническом случае. Цель – оценить реальные клинические преимущества и недостатки установки дентальных имплантатов с использованием хирургического шаблона по сравнению с традиционным протоколом лечения. Методология. Поиск литературы проводился в научных поисковых библиографических базах данных, таких как PubMed, eLibrary, Medline, Google Academy. По тематическим рубрикам «Дентальная имплантация» и «Хирургический шаблон» было найдено более 384 исследований до 2014 г. В ходе изучения данных работ в выборку вошли 56 статей и литературных обзоров. Выводы. В последнее время установка имплантата с использованием хирургического шаблона стала популярным методом лечения среди стоматологов-хирургов. Изучение современной литературы позволило сформулировать основные преимущества и недостатки данной методики. Плюсы метода: точное позиционирование имплантатов; безлоскутная операция сокращает время операции и характеризуется благоприятным послеоперационным течением; интеграция реставрационных детерминант в хирургическое планирование, что приводит к более эстетичному, функциональному и предсказуемому результату протезирования; возможность предварительного изготовления протеза, основанного на запланированном положении имплантата; упрощение хирургической процедуры для стоматолога. Однако этот метод не лишен недостатков: сложность для хирурга визуализировать анатомические структуры; требует дополнительного цифрового планирования.
управляемая хирургия, дентальная имплантация, хирургический шаблон, CAD/CAM, протезирование
1. Brief J., Edinger D., Hassfeld S., Eggers G. Accuracy of image-guided implantology // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2005;16 (4):495-501. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x
2. Tahmaseb A., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2014;29:25-42.
3. Vercruyssen M., van de Wiele G., Teughels W., Naert I., Jacobs R., Quirynen M. Implant- and patient-centred outcomes of guided surgery, a 1-year follow-up: an RCT comparing guided surgery with conventional implant placement // J Clin Periodontol. – 2014;41 (12):1154-1160.
4. Pozzi A., Tallarico M., Marchetti M., Scarfò B., Esposito M. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial // Eur J Oral Implantol. – 2014;7 (3):229-242.
5. Cassetta M., Giansanti M., Di Mambro A., Stefanelli L. V. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2014;29 (5): 1071-1078.
6. Tahmaseb A., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2014;29 (Suppl):25-42.
7. Mangano F., Gandolfi A., Luongo G., Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature // BMC Oral Health. – 2017;17:149.
8. Tallarico M., Xhanari E., Cocchi F., Canullo L., Schipani F., Meloni S. M. Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using a conventional impression and scan model or digital impression: A preliminary report from a randomized controlled trial // J. Oral Sci. Rehabil. – 2017;3:8-16.
9. Tallarico M., Esposito M., Xhanari E., Caneva M., Meloni S.M. Computer-guided vs freehand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 5-year post- loading results of a randomised controlled trial // Eur. J. Oral Implantol. – 2018;11:203-213.
10. Sommacal B., Savic M., Filippi A., Kühl S., Thieringer F.M. Evaluation of Two 3D Printers for Guided Implant Surgery // Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. – 2018;33: 743-746.
11. Colombo M., Mangano C., Mijiritsky E., Krebs M., Hauschild U., Fortin T. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: A critical review based on randomized controlled trials // BMC Oral Health. – 2017;17:150.
12. Meloni S. M., Tallarico M., Pisano M., Xhanari E., Canullo L. Immediate loading of fixed complete denture prosthesis supported by 4-8 implants placed using guided surgery: A 5 years prospective study on 66 patients with 356 implants // Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. – 2017;19:195-206.
13. Schneider D., Schober F., Grohmann P., Hammerle C. H., Jung R. E. In-vitro evaluation of the tolerance of surgical instruments in templates for computer-assisted guided implantology produced by 3-D printing // Clin. Oral Implants Res. – 2015;26: 320-325.
14. Ganz S. D. Three-dimensional imaging and guided surgery for dental implants // Dent Clin North Am. – 2015;59 (2):265-290.
15. Flügge T., Derksen W., Te Poel J., Hassan B., Nelson K., Wismeijer D. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2017;28 (9):1113-1118.
16. Deeb G. R., Antonos L., Tack S. et al. Is cone beam computed technology always necessary for implant placement? // J Oral Maxillofac Surg. – 2017; 75 (2): 285-289.
17. Duello G. V. Intraoral scanning for single-tooth implant prosthetics: rationale for a digital protocol // Compend Contin Educ Dent. – 2018;39 (1):28-34.
18. Marghalani A., Weber Hy.-P., Finkelman M. et al. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: an evaluation of accuracy // J Prosthet Dent. – 2018;119 (4):574-579.
19. Nedelcu R., Olsson P., Nystrom I. et al. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: a novel in vivo analysis method // J Dent. – 2018;69:110-118.
20. Papaspyridakos P., Gallucci G. O., Chen C.-J. et al. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2016;27 (4):465-472.
21. Smeets R., Stadlinger B., Schwarz F., Beck-Broichsitter B., Jung O., Precht C., Kloss F., Gröbe A., Heiland M., Ebker T. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on Osseointegration // Biomed Res Int. – 2016;2016:6285620.
22. Vercruyssen M., van de Wiele G., Teughels W., Naert I., Jacobs R., Quirynen M. Implant- and patient-centred outcomes of guided surgery, a 1-year follow-up: an RCT comparing guided surgery with conventional implant placement // J Clin Periodontol. – 2014;41 (12):1154-1160.
23. Cassetta M., Giansanti M., Di Mambro A., Stefanelli L. V. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2014;29(5):1071-1078.
24. Tahmaseb A., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2014;29 (Suppl):25-42.
25. Grandi T., Guazzi P., Samarani R., Maghaireh H., Grandi G. One abutment-one time versus a provisional abutment in immediately loaded post-extractive single implants: a 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial // Eur J Oral Implantol. – 2014;7 (2):141-149.
26. O'Connor Esteban M., Riad Deglow E., Zubizarreta-Macho Á., Hernández Montero S. Influence of the Digital Mock-Up and Experience on the Ability to Determine the Prosthetically Correct Dental Implant Position during Digital Planning: An In Vitro Study // J Clin Med. – 2019;9 (1):48.
27. Sun T. M., Lee H. E., Lan T. H. The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system // BMC Oral Health. – 2019;19:222-233.
28. Tahmaseb A., Wu V., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Clin. Oral Implants Res. – 2018;16:416-435.
29. Fabbri G., Cannistraro G., Pulcini C., Sorrentino R. The full-mouth mock-up: A dynamic diagnostic approach (DDA) to test function and esthetics in complex rehabilitations with increased vertical dimension of occlusion // Int. J. Esthet. Dent. – 2018;13:460-474.
30. Schulz M. C., Hofmann F., Range U., Lauer G., Haim D. Pilot-drill guided vs. full-guided implant insertion in artificial mandibles—A prospective laboratory study in fifth-year dental students // Int. J. Implant Dent. – 2019;5:23-28.
31. Al Yafi F., Camenisch B., Al-Sabbagh M. Is Digital Guided Implant Surgery Accurate and Reliable? // Dent Clin North Am. – 2019;63 (3):381-397.
32. Oh J. H., An X., Jeong S. M., Choi B. H. Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients: A Case Report // J Oral Maxillofac Surg. – 2017;75 (12):2541-2549.
33. Stapleton B. M., Lin W. S., Ntounis A., Harris B. T., Morton D. Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report // J Prosthet Dent. – 2014;112 (3):402-408.
34. Charette J. R., Goldberg J., Harris B. T., Morton D., Llop D. R., Lin W. S. Cone beam computed tomography imaging as a primary diagnostic tool for computer-guided surgery and CAD-CAM interim removable and fixed dental prostheses // J Prosthet Dent. – 2016;116 (2):157-165.
35. Arunyanak S. P., Harris B. T., Grant G. T., Morton D., Lin W. S. Digital approach to planning computer-guided surgery and immediate provisionalization in a partially edentulous patient // J Prosthet Dent. – 2016;116 (1):8-14.
36. Orentlicher G., Horowitz A., Kobren L. Computer-Guided Dental Implant Treatment of Complete Arch Restoration of Edentulous and Terminal Dentition Patients // Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. – 2019;31 (3):399-426.
37. Pozzi A., Arcuri L., Moy P. K. Temporary Shell Proof-of-Concept Technique: Digital-Assisted Workflow to Enable Customized Immediate Function in Two Visits in Partially Edentulous Patients // Compend Contin Educ Dent. – 2018;39 (3):e9-e12.
38. Pascual D., Vaysse J. Chirurgie implantaire et prothèse guidées et assistées par ordinateur : le flux numérique continu [Guided and computer-assisted implant surgery and prosthetic: The continuous digital workflow] // Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. – 2016;117 (1):28-35.
39. Oh K. C., Jeon C., Park J. M., Shim J. S. Digital workflow to provide an immediate interim restoration after single-implant placement by using a surgical guide and a matrix-positioning device // J Prosthet Dent. – 2019;121 (1):17-21.
40. Joda T., Zarone F., Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review // BMC Oral Health. – 2017;19;17 (1):124.
41. Joda T., Brägger U. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2016;27 (11):1401-1406.
42. Joda T., Ferrari M., Brägger U. Monolithic implant-supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up // Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. – 2017;19 (3):505-511.
43. Soardi C. M., Bramanti E., Cicciù M. Clinical and radiological 12-year follow-up of full arch maxilla prosthetic restoration supported by dental implants positioned through guide flapless surgery // Minerva Stomatol. – 2014;63 (3):85-94.
44. Edelhoff D., Schweiger J., Prandtner O., Stimmelmayr M., Güth J. F. Metal-free implant-supported single-tooth restorations. Part I: Abutments and cemented crowns // Quintessence Int. – 2019;50 (3):176-184.
45. Hassan B., Gimenez Gonzalez B., Tahmaseb A., Greven M., Wismeijer D. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: A pilot clinical study // J Prosthet Dent. – 2017;117 (4):486-492.
46. Papaspyridakos P., Ben Yehuda D., Rajput N., Weber H. P. Digital Workflow: From Guided Surgery to Final Full-Arch Implant Prosthesis in Three Visits // Compend Contin Educ Dent. – 2018;39 (7):e1-e4.
47. Benic G. I., Elmasry M., Hämmerle C. H. Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2015;26 Suppl 11:86-96.
48. Rios H. F., Borgnakke W. S., Benavides E. The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Management of Patients Requiring Dental Implants: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Review // J Periodontol. – 2017;88 (10):946-959.
49. Smitkarn P., Subbalekha K., Mattheos N., Pimkhaokham A. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery // J Clin Periodontol. – 2019;46 (9):949-957.
50. Tan P. L. B., Layton D. M., Wise S. L. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique // Int J Comput Dent. – 2018;21 (2):87-95.
51. Bencharit S., Staffen A., Yeung M., Whitley D. 3rd, Laskin D. M., Deeb G. R. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery // J Oral Maxillofac Surg. – 2018;76 (7):1431-1439.
52. Deeb G. R., Allen R. K., Hall V. P., Whitley D. 3rd, Laskin D. M., Bencharit S. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers? // J Oral Maxillofac Surg. – 2017;75 (12):2559.e1-2559.e8.
53. Mandelaris G. A., Stefanelli L. V., DeGroot B. S. Dynamic Navigation for Surgical Implant Placement: Overview of Technology, Key Concepts, and a Case Report // Compend Contin Educ Dent. – 2018;39 (9):614-621; quiz 622.
54. Pellegrino G., Mangano C., Mangano R., Ferri A., Taraschi V., Marchetti C. Augmented reality for dental implantology: a pilot clinical report of two cases // BMC Oral Health. – 2019;19;19 (1):158.
55. Ayoub A., Pulijala Y. The application of virtual reality and augmented reality in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery // BMC Oral Health. – 2019;8;19 (1):238.
56. Kaewsiri D., Panmekiate S., Subbalekha K., Mattheos N., Pimkhaokham A. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2019;30 (6):505-514.
