Abstract. Relevance. The article is devoted to the issue of activation of the domestic agro-industrial complex’s (APC) patent and licensing activities as the most important resource of its advanced innovative self-development and effective adaptation to new realities caused by patterns of the large-scale transformational changes in the processes of changing technological setups, as well as the need to minimize unfriendly states’ unprecedented sanctions aimed at restricting access to goods and technologies with a high intellectual component. The study relevance of the forced transfer issue of the agro-industrial complex of rural areas to the intellectual development vector increases sharply due to the insufficient development of methodological tools for assessing the use effectiveness of its intangible assets in terms of achieving strategic goals of ensuring food security and sovereign self-development of the Russian Federation regions. The purpose of the research is to assess the current state and prospects for the transition of Russian APC to an intellectual development vector based on the information resource patent. The main research methods are the following: 1) scientometric analysis of the research’s publication field; 2) data economic and statistical analysis on the state of agriculture in the Russian regions; 3) rating method for assessing agriculture in the Russian regions; 4) ecosystem approach to evaluating the patent activity effectiveness. Results. Special attention in the methodology of the author’s research was paid to the issues of increasing the regional agro-industrial clusters’ patent potential based on an ecosystem approach to intellectual property management. The proposed methodological tools of the study make it possible to timely clarify the priority directions for the new structure formation of the intellectual property ecosystem in the agro-industrial complex of the Russian regions, transfer from managing import substitution processes to proactive import substitution projects management, strengthen territorial integrity and expand the institutions’ range of coordinating high-tech projects and supporting the development of highly intelligent entrepreneurship networks. The scientific novelty of the research results lies in the application of an ecosystem approach in the assessment of the effectiveness in patent activities of APC and agriculture of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as it makes it possible to determine the monetary and institutional factors of their uneven access to competencies of intellectual property management.
agro-industrial complex, innovative self-development, intellectual property, patent potential, advanced competitiveness
1. Glazyev S. Y Noonomika kak sterzhen’ formirovaniya novogo tekhnologicheskogo i mirokhozyaystvennogo ukladov [Noonomics as the core of the formation of a new technological and world economic order] // Noonomy and Noosociety. Almanac of works of the INIR named after S. Y. Witte. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 43–64. (In Russian.)
2. Bodrunov S. D. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy progress i transformatsiya obshchestva: noonomika i nooobshchestvo. Chast’ 1 [Scientific and technological progress and transformation of society: economy and noobshchestvo. Part 1] // Noonomy and Noosociety. Almanac of works of the INIR named after S. Y. Witte. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 24–42. (In Russian.)
3. Voloshchenko E. M., Belokurenko N. S. Nematerial’nyye aktivy predpriyatiy APK: upravlencheskiy aspekt [Intangible assets of agricultural enterprises: managerial aspect] // Youth Science Forum. 2021. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pp. 8–16. (In Russian.)
4. Daribaeva A., Shulenbayeva F. A., Madenova K. M. Parametry formirovaniya innovatsionnoy aktivnosti agrarnogo sektora ekonomiki Kazakhstana [Parameters of the formation of innovative activity of the agricultural sector of the economy of Kazakhstan] // Statistics, accounting and audit. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 71–76. (In Russian.)
5. Mabiala J. Osnovy problematiki innovatsionnogo razvitiya agropromyshlennogo proizvodstva [Fundamentals of the problems of innovative development of agro-industrial production] // Innovatsionnoe razvitie sovremennoy nauki problemy, zakonomernosti, perspektivy sbornik statey VI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Penza, 2018. Pp. 71–74. (In Russian.)
6. Petukhova M. S. Formirovaniye ekosistemy nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya APK (na primere Novosibirskoy oblasti) [Formation of the ecosystem of scientific and technological development of the agro-industrial complex (on the example of the Novosibirsk region)] // Economic overview. 2019. No. 2. Pp. 12–15. (In Russian.)
7. Velikanova I. V., Rozhmina T. A., Popov R. A. Metodicheskiye podkhody i ekonomicheskoye obosnovaniye litsenzionnykh voznagrazhdeniy za selektsionnyye dostizheniya v l’nyanom podkomplekse [Methodological approaches and economic justification of licensing fees for breeding achievements in the flax subcomplex] // Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2022. No. 04 (219). Pp. 82–92. DOI: 10.32417/1997-4868-2022-219-04-82-92. (In Russian.)
8. Tambo J. A., Barake E., Kouevi A., Timanyechi Munthali G. Copyright or copyleft: An assessment of farmer-innovators’ attitudes towards intellectual property rights. // Journal of Rural Studies. 2020. Vol. 74. Pp. 133–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.004.
9. Nguyen-Anh T., Hoang-Duc C., Nguyen-Thi-Thuy L., Vu-Tien V., Nguyen-Dinh U., To-The N. Do intangible assets stimulate firm performance? Empirical evidence from Vietnamese agriculture, forestry and fishery small- and medium-sized enterprises [e-resource] // Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2022. Vol. 7. Iss. 3. Article number 100194. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100194. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X22000348 (date of reference: 16.05.2022).
10. Fridlyanova S. Yu. Rezul’tativnost’ innovatsiy v pandemiyu vyrosla [The effectiveness of innovations in the pandemic has grown] [e-resource] // Science of Technology Innovations. Express information (release date – 02.02.2022). URL: https://www.issek.hse.ru (date of reference: 16.05.2022). (In Russian.)
11. Abashkin V. L., Abdrakhmanova G. I., Bredikhin S. V. et al. Reyting innovatsionnogo razvitiya sub”yektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Vypusk 7 [Rating of innovative development of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Issue 7]. Moscow: HSE, 2021. 274 p. (In Russian.)
12. Mokronosov A. G., Asylguzhin T. R., Kondrat’yev I. P., Likhacheva S. S. Ekosistemnyy podkhod k upravleniyu intellektual’noy sobstvennost’yu v tsifrovoy ekonomike [Ecosystem approach to intellectual property management in the digital economy] // Tsifrovaya transformatsiya promyshlennosti: tendentsii, upravlenie, strategii: materialy I Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Ekaterinburg, 2021. Pp. 85–97. (In Russian.)
13. Kuznetsova T. V., Belova E. A. Tsentry podderzhki tekhnologiy i innovatsiy v innovatsionnoy ekosisteme regiona [Technology and innovation support centers in the innovation ecosystem of the region] // Intellectual property. Industrial property. 2021. No. 12. Pp. 17–22. (In Russian.)
14. Kot E. M. Opyt upravleniya riskami v sel’skom khozyaystve [Experience of risk management in agriculture] // Financial Economics. 2022. No. 3 (165). Pp. 30–34. DOI: 10.25997/FIE.2022.98.3.001. (In Russian.)
15. Pustuev A. A. Problemy i perspektivy ustoychivogo razvitiya agroekonomicheskoy sistemy i sel’skikh territoriy [Problems and prospects of sustainable development of the agro-economic system and rural territories] // Economics of agricultural and processing enterprises. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 44–50. (In Russian.)
16. Voronin B. A. et al. Formirovaniye i razvitiye chelovecheskogo kapitala v sel’skikh territoriyakh [Formation and development of human capital in rural areas]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo GAU, 2021. 136 p. (In Russian.)
