Russian companies doing business outside of the Russian Federation require special protection of their rights and lawful interests. Several methods of protecting foreign investor rights are available under the international law, including national courts and tribunals and commercial arbitrations (both institutionary and ad-hoc). International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes is a special institution established to resolve the controversies related to foreign investments. It was created under an international treaty and its decisions are not subject to sovereign immunity. The article considers ICSID practice regarding the definition of an investment, since disputes are related to an investment activity, which is a topical question when dealing with the determination of the Center competence. While the analyzed cases do not have the power of binding precedents, when the arbiters elaborate on the definition of a foreign investment they use specific criteria that could be relevant for the national law. Since international practice has a more specific definition of foreign investments than the Russian law, the author suggests that the former be taken into consideration when a foreign investment is defined in Russian legal texts. It could ensure better protection of the rights of Russian legal entities abroad.
Law, foreign investments, International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, practice.
1. France and Belgium Freeze Russian State Assets over Yukos Case. URL: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3ab475a6-15da-11e5-a58d-00144feabdc0.html (data obrashcheniya: 02.08.2015).
2. Grabowski A. The Definition of Investment under the ICSID Convention: A Defense of Salini. Chicago Journal of International Law. 2014. Vol. 15.
3. Irene M. Ten Cate. The Costs of Consistency: Precedent in Investment Treaty Arbitration. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2013. Vol. 51. No. 2.
4. Rayfuse R., Lauterpacht E. ICSID Reports: Reports of Cases Decided under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between the States and Nationals of Other States, 1965. Vol. 5. Cambridge, 2002.
5. Remy B. CIRDI: Chronique des sentences arbitrales. Journal du droit international. 2014. No. 1.
6. Schreuer Ch. Commentary on the ICSID Convention. ICSID Review. Foreign Investment Law Journal. 1996. Vol. 11.
7. The ICSID Conciliation Rules and the Arbitration Rules, in Effect Since April 10, 2006. URL: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/main-eng.htm (data obrashcheniya: 02.08.2015).
8. Bel´giyskie sudebnye pristavy arestovali gosaktivy Rossii po isku YuKOSa. URL: http://www.interfax.ru/world/448096 (data obrashcheniya: 02.08.2015).
9. Buslaeva L. M. Razreshenie investitsionnykh sporov v ramkakh Mezhdunarodnogo tsentra po uregulirovaniyu investitsionnykh sporov. Zakony Rossii. 2008. № 1.
10. Danel´yan A. A., Farkhutdinov I. Z. Mezhdunarodnyy investitsionnyy arbitrazh: ucheb. posobie. M.; SPb., 2013.
11. Doronina N. G., Semilyutina N. G. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo i investitsii: monografiya. M., 2012.
12. Farkhutdinov I. Z. Mezhdunarodnoe investitsionnoe pravo i protsess: uchebnik. M., 2010.
13. Farkhutdinov I. Z. Mezhdunarodnoe investitsionnoe pravo: teoriya i praktika primeneniya: nauch.-prakt. izd. M., 2005.
