Taking into Account Perpetrator’s Personality and Circumstances Mitigating or Aggravating the Punishment, as One of the Criteria of Fair Punishment

Evelina Shkredova

doi:doi:10.12737/19773

Taking into Account Perpetrator’s Personality and Circumstances Mitigating or Aggravating the Punishment, as One of the Criteria of Fair Punishment

Published в Journal of Russian Law · Volume 4, Issue 6, 2016 · Pages 0–0 · Rubrics: Criminal Law and Criminology

DOI 10.12737/19773

Received: 23.05.2016 Accepted: 30.05.2016 Published: 30.05.2016 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Evelina Shkredova

ABSTRACT

The article is devoted to the analysis of the general principles, which are most frequently taken into account in infliction of penalty: perpetrator’s personality and the circumstances mitigating or aggravating the punishment. In particular, the author notes that negative personality characteristics, which do not manifest themselves in the criminal conduct and which do not give evidence of the social danger should not be taken into account in sentencing. The author examines which characteristics of the individual offender must be considered in sentencing. The author attends to errors arising from the use of the circumstances in question and resulting in the violation of the principle of justice. The main reasons for these errors are inattention of judges (with regard to non-recognition of a number of circumstances as mitigating or aggravating) and the imperfection of the law (in the wording of some circumstances). In conclusion, the author arrives at the idea about the necessity of formalization of the influence of aggravating and mitigating circumstances on punishment.

KEYWORDS

justice sentencing perpetrator’s personality circumstances mitigating or aggravating the punishment.

Information References

Authors:

Type:

Article

Pages:

from 0 to 0

Status:

Published

Language:

Russian

Keywords:

justice, sentencing, perpetrator’s personality, circumstances mitigating or aggravating the punishment.

References

1. Gorelik A. S. Obstoyatel´stva, vliyayushchie na razmer nakazaniya. Aktual´nye voprosy pravovedeniya na sovremennom etape. Tomsk, 1986.

2. Donets S. P. Smyagchayushchie i otyagchayushchie obstoyatel´stva v ugolovnom prave: pravovaya priroda, klassifikatsiya, problemy ucheta: dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan´, 2003.

3. Dyad´kin D. S. Teoreticheskie osnovy naznacheniya ugolovnogo nakazaniya: algoritmicheskiy podkhod. SPb., 2006.

4. Zagorskiy G. Motivirovka nakazaniya v prigovore suda. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost´. 1980. № 5.

5. Isaeva S. G. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie smyagchayushchikh i otyagchayushchikh obstoyatel´stv. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». 1979. № 1.

6. Lazutkin A. I. Realizatsiya printsipa spravedlivosti pri naznachenii nakazaniya v vide lisheniya svobody. URL: http://www.dissercat.com/content/realizatsiya-printsipaspravedlivosti-pri-naznachenii-nakazaniya-v-vide-lisheniya-svobody (data obrashcheniya: 30.07.2015).

7. Mal´tsev V. V. Printsipy ugolovnogo prava i ikh realizatsiya v pravoprimenitel´noy deyatel´nosti. SPb., 2004.

8. Mel´nikova Yu. B. Lichnost´ prestupnika i individualizatsiya ugolovnogo nakazaniya. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1972. № 8.

9. Nepomnyashchaya T. V. Naznachenie ugolovnogo nakazaniya: teoriya, praktika, perspektivy. SPb., 2006.

10. Tagantsev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo. Lektsii. Chast´ obshchaya: v 2 t. T. 2. M., 1994.

11. Ushakova M. G. Smyagchayushchie nakazanie obstoyatel´stva v ugolovnom prave Rossii: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002.

Taking into Account Perpetrator’s Personality and Circumstances Mitigating or Aggravating the Punishment, as One of the Criteria of Fair Punishment

Confirmation

Регистрация