doctoral candidate
Surgut, Surgutskiy gosuniversitet, Tyumen, Russian Federation
The relevance of the study is due to the fact that Russian universities as subjects implementing local strategies in the field of development of science and education, in connection with the inclusion in the processes of internationalization, seek to enter the international level of competitiveness. Significant reserves of increasing international competitiveness are associated with the development of promising approaches to the management of the effectiveness of scientific and pedagogical personnel. In these conditions, the key success factor is the development and implementation of technologies to manage the effectiveness of intellectual work as the most important source of development and improving the efficiency of scientific and pedagogical staff. In this connection, the author in the article highlights the main directions in the management of the effectiveness of intellectual workers in higher education institutions and the factors that determine them, which determines the practical value of research. It is substantiated that the management of the effectiveness of scientific and pedagogical personnel is impossible without constructing a clear connection between individual performance indicators and the strategic goals of the university. The scientific novelty is the development of an expanded approach to the management of the effectiveness of intellectual workers in higher education institutions, which should be oriented both to the formation of performance indicators and models of labor remuneration, and to build an integral system for managing human capital on the basis of planning, development and preservation of competences of scientific pedagogical staff.
intellectual work, institutions of higher education, scientific and pedagogical cadres, human capital.
Введение
В современном обществе выделяется особый класс интеллектуальных работников, которые участвуют в формировании нового общества, ориентированного на преобладание новшеств над традициями во всех элементах социальной и производственной среды, использование качественно новых моделей развития, ускорение темпов внедрения инноваций и эффективного преобразования установившейся за предыдущие периоды социальной структуры.
1. Inozemtsev V.L. «Klass intellektualov» v postindustrial’nom obshchestve [«The class of intellectuals» in the post-industrial society]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research]. 2000, I. 6, pp. 67–77.
2. Shirinkina E.V. Formirovanie chelovecheskogo kapitala v postindustrial’noy ekonomike [Formation of human capital in the post-industrial economy]. Barnaul, 2017. 223 p.
3. Shirinkina E.V. Formirovanie chelovecheskogo kapitala v sisteme rossiyskogo obrazovaniya: istoricheskiy aspekt [Formation of human capital in the system of Russian education: the historical aspect]. Obrazovanie: traditsii i innovatsii : Materialy XV mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Education: traditions and innovations: Materials of the XV International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Prague, 2017, pp. 260–263.
4. Shirinkina E.V. Model’ vypusknika v paradigme reformirovaniya vysshego obrazovaniya [The graduate model in the paradigm of reforming higher education]. World Science Proceedings of articles the international scientific conference [World Science Proceedings of the articles of the international scientific conference], Czech Republic, Karlovy Vary — Russia, Moscow, 2017, pp. 275–277.
5. Armstrong M. Performance management: Key strategies and practical guidances. Kogan Page. London, 2000.
6. Walters M. Performance management. Institute of personnel and development, London, 1995.
7. Kagaari J., Meunene J.C., Ntayi J.M. Performance management practices? Employee attitudes and managed performance. 2010, V. 24, I. 6, pp. 507–530.
8. Kagaari J. Performance management practices and managed performance: the moderating influence of organizational culture and climate in public Universities in Uganda. Measuring Business Excellence. 2011, V. 15, I. 4, pp. 36–49.
9. Shirinkina E.V. Monitoring reformirovaniya vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii [Monitoring of the reform of higher education in Russia]. Rossiyskie regiony v fokuse peremen: Sbornik dokladov XI Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Rossiyskie regiony v fokuse peremen» [Russian regions in the focus of change Collected papers XI International Conference]. Ekaterinburg, 2017, pp. 610–619.
10. Abakumova I.V., Antonova E.K., Baigulov R.M. and others. Nauchnye issledovaniya v sfere sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh i gumanitarnykh nauk: mezhdistsiplinarnyy podkhod i konvergentsiya znaniy [Scientific research in the field of socio-economic and human sciences: interdisciplinary approach and convergence of knowledge]. Samara, 2016. 439 p.
11. Rossiyskoe obrazovanie — 2020: model’ obrazovaniya dlya ekonomiki, osnovannoy na znaniyakh [Russian education 2020: an education model for a knowledge-based economy]. IX Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. «Modernizatsiya ekonomiki i globalizatsiya», Moskva, 1–3 aprelya 2008 g. [IX international. science. Conf. “Modernization of economy and globalization”, Moscow, 1–3 April 2008]. Moscow, 2008. 39 p.
12. Baigulov R.M. Rezul’taty sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh i mezhdistsiplinarnykh nauchnykh issledovaniy XXI veka [Results of socioeconomic and interdisciplinary scientific research of the XXI century]. Samara, Ofort Publ., 2016. 433 p.
