Russian Federation
The article deals with the phenomenon of “science communication”, which is considered as a complex system including different subjects who use varied communication channel and vehicles to generate personal interest, form positive attitude and understanding of science. The article examines the reasons which have led to an increased need for scientists to communicate. Among the latter can be identified: the loss of expertise and authority of scientists; a change in the nature of knowledge production; improved communications and a proliferation of sources of information; the democratic deficit. These factors are equally valid in the developed countries. The peculiarities of science communication in scientific and educational field in Russia, the USA, Germany, Great Britain, China and Japan are also investigated. The conclusion is made about the need of two-way communication between science and society; the dependency of communication peculiarities on government goals.
science communication, factors leading to the development of science communication, communication practices, peculiarities of science communication, scientific and educational field.
Научная коммуникация, смыслом которой является обмен информацией, составляет ядро профессиональной деятельности ученых [7]. Это область знаний, объединяющая научную журналистику, классический пиар и популяризацию науки.
1. Associacija kommunikatorov v sfere obrazovanija i nauki [Association of communicators in the field of education and science]. Available at: http://akson.science (accessed 15 May 2017).
2. Gasparov B.M. Jazyk. Pamjat’. Obraz. Lingvistika jazykovogo sushhestvovanija [Language. Memory. Form. Linguistics of language existence]. Moscow, «Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie» Publ., 1996. 352 p.
3. Giljarevskij R.S., Mihajlov A.I., Chernyj A.I. Nauchnye kommunikacii i informatika [Scientific Communications and Informatics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976. 435 p.
4. Issledovanie kommunikacionnyh praktik nauchno-obrazovatel’nyh organizacij RF [Research of communication practices of scientific and educational organizations of the Russian Federation]. 2016. Available at: https://www.rvc.ru/upload/iblock/-70f/201409_ Study_communication_practices.pdf (accessed 05 May 2017).
5. Krejg R.T. Teorija kommunikacii kak oblast’ znanija [Theory of communication as a field of knowledge]. Komparativistika III: Al’manah sravnitel’nyh sociogumanitarnyh issledovanij [Komparativistika III: Almanac of Comparative Social and Humanitarian Studies]. St. Petersburg, Sociologicheskoe obshhestvo im. M.M. Kovalevskogo Publ., 2003, pp. 72–126.
6. Medvedeva S.M. Nauchnaja kommunikacija v sovremennom mire: problemy i perspektivy [Scientific Communication in the Modern World: Problems and Prospects]. Materialy konferencii XIX Shishkinskie chtenija [Proceedings of the Conference XIX Shishkin Readings]. MGIMO Publ. 2013, pp. 253–255.
7. Mirskaja E.Z., Shaposhnik S.B. Komp’juternye telekommunikacii v rossijskoj nauke [Computer telecommunications in Russian science]. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 1998, V. 68, I. 3, pp. 203–213.
8. Oficial’nyj sajt Gazeta.ru. «S Rossiej nichego ne proishodit» [Official site of Newspaper.ru. “Nothing happens with Russia”]. Available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/science/2013/06/10_a_5375045.shtml (accessed 21 May 2017).
9. Otchet Evrokomissii «Sozdanie konkurentnoj sredy v oblasti nauchnyh issledovanij» [Report of the European Commission “Creation of a competitive environment in the field of scientific research”]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation- Union/pdf/ikt_expert-_report.pdf (accessed 28 May 2017).
10. Rossijskaja sociologicheskaja enciklopedija [Russian sociological encyclopedia]. 1998. Available at: https://www.psyoffice. ru/slovar-s204-ru4.htm (accessed 05 June 2017).
11. “Academy to promote science communication in China”. Official site: Sci.Dev.Net.— Available at: http://www.scidev.net/global/ communication/news/-academy-to-promote-science-communication-in-china.html (22.05.2017) (accessed 11 May 2017).
12. Benneworth P. The challenges for 21st century science — a review of the evidence base surrounding the value of public engagement by scientists. Enschede: Universiteit Twente. 2009.
13. Bultitude K. Presenting Science // In Brake M.L. and Weitkamp E. Introducing Science Communication. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 2010.
14. Burns T.W., O’Connor D.J. and Stocklmayer S.M. Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition // “Public Understanding of Science”, 2003. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09636625030122004 (accessed 23 April 2017).
15. European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 340 / Wave 73.1 — TNS Opinion & Social. Brussels: Directorate-General for Communication. 2010.
16. Ipsos MORI. Public attitudes to science 2011. Department for Business, innovation and Skills. 2011. Available at: http://www.ipsos-ori.com/Assets/Docs/-Polls/sri-pas-2011-main-report.pdf (accessed 20 April 2017).
17. Kerr A., Cunningham-Burley S. and Tutton R. Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue // Social Studies of Science. 2007. Vol. 37 (3). P. 385–411.
18. Leadbeater C.We-Think: mass innovation, not mass production. London: Profile Books. 2008.
19. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C., Smith N. and Dawson E.Climategate, public opinion and the loss of trust. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. 2010. — URL: http://climatecommunication.yale.edu-/publications/climategate-public-opinion-and-the-loss-of-trust/ (accessed 08 May 2017).
20. “Science and the public: A review of science communication and public attitudes to science in Britain”. Available at: https:// wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/-files/wtd003419_0.pdf (accessed 17 May 2017).
