graduate student
, Russian Federation
VAC 12.00.00 Юриспруденция
VAC 13.00.00 Педагогика
VAC 19.00.00 Психология
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
UDK 15 Психология
UDK 37 Образование. Воспитание. Обучение. Организация досуга
GRNTI 10.77 Уголовное право
The article deals with the problems of socio-legal conditionality of the criminal record as a complex phenomenon in the criminal legislation of Tajikistan and Russia. The author analyzes and reflects the arguments in favor of the existence of the institution of criminal record, and against it for each of which the author notes his vision. In addition, on the studied issue, empirical materials are provided, namely the results of the survey of respondents, statistics and examples from judicial practice. In conclusion, the author concludes that the institution of criminal record, with the exception of individual cases, is essential not only in the theory and practice of criminal and criminal-Executive law, but also in other branches of law. For this reason, he argues that it is imperative not only to keep this institution in the legislation of both countries, but also to continue to work on its further improvement
institute of criminal record, criminal law, law, justice, Tajikistan, Russia
1. Golik Yu. V. Enciklopediya ugolovnogo prava. – T. 10. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya. – Sankt-Peterburg: SPb GKL, 2008. – 880 s.
2. Yanchevskiy B. Pogashenie sudimosti // Ezhenedel'nik sovetskoy yusticii. – 1924. – № 50. – S. 1207.
3. Neverov. Voprosy ugolovnoy politiki: ob unichtozhenii sudimosti // Sovetskaya yusticiya. – 1930. – № 12. – S. 12–13.
4. Sudebnaya statistika. Prestupnost' i sudimost'. – Moskva: Rossiyskiy yuridicheskoy izdatel'skiy dom, 1998. – 64 s.
5. Materialy diskussii po dokladu Sol'c A.A. «Posledstviya otbytiya nakazaniya i voprosy snyatiya sudimosti» // Sovetskaya yusticiya. – 1936. – № 22. – S. 15–16.
6. Tagancev N. S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo : lekcii. – Chast' obschaya. – V 2 t. – T. 2. – Moskva: Nauka, 1994. – 293 s.
7. Slavin I. Nakazuema li ugolovnaya neblagonadezhnost' (administrativnaya i sudebnaya praktika) // Ezhenedel'nik sovetskoy yusticii. – 1922. – № 14–15. – S. 5–7.
8. Nikiforov B. S. O recidive i sudimosti // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1957. – № 5. – S. 100–105.
9. Minaev K. A. Sudimost' kak odin iz samyh protivorechivyh institutov ugolovnogo prava : sb. tezisov dokladov. – Saratov: Saratovskaya gos. akademiya prava, 2009. – S. 399-400.
10. Muzafarov S. Z. Klassifikaciya posledstviy sudimosti po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Tadzhikistana i Rossii // Trudy Akademii MVD Respubliki Tadzhikistan. – 2018. – № 3 (39). – S. 123–131.
11. Stepichev S. Nuzhen li institut sudimosti? // Socialisticheskaya zakonnost'. – 1965. – № 9. – S. 14–18.
12. Filimonov F. Institut sudimosti sleduet sohranit' // Socialisticheskaya zakonnost'. – 1966. – № 2. – S. 41–42.
13. Kazakova N., Kravcov G. Institut sudimosti neobhodimo sovershenstvovat' // Uchenye zapiski VNIISZ. – 1966. – Vyp. 8. – S. 233–236.
14. Bytko Yu. I. Spravedlivost' i ugolovnaya politika : monografiya. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2017. – 216 s.
15. Firsova A. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie sudimosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 47–52.
16. Manannikov D. Yu. Uvol'nyat' ili ne uvol'nyat'? Vot v chem vopros (O naznachenii nakazaniya v vide lisheniya svobody uslovno kak ob odnom iz osnovaniy dosrochnogo uvol'neniya s voennoy sluzhby po iniciative komandovaniya) // Pravo v Vooruzhennyh Silah. – 2008. – № 6. – S. 33–38.
