Format requirements for scientific articles:

– Volume – 10-20 pages of typewritten text (the standard page is 1800 symbols with spaces, including tables, pictures and references).

– The text editor Word and font Times New Roman should be used when typing an article (Type size – 14; Line spacing – 1.5 cm; Indentation – 1.25 cm; Margins: left ‒ 2.5 cm, right ‒ 1.5 cm, top and bottom ‒ 2.0 cm). If additional fonts were used when typing, the author must provide them to the editorial department;

– Alignment – portrait;

– Page numbering (except first page) – left bottom;

It is not allowed to use manual hyphenation and spaces.

In the Russian language text «French quotations symbols» are used for quotations and in the text in foreign languages – “curly quotes”.

Illustrations (pictures, tables, graphs, charts, etc.) are submitted separately (as separate files fragment and on separate pages in printed form). The recommended width of the drawing should not exceed 14 cm, the height should not exceed 18 cm. The recommended format is *jpg. Illustrative materials should have a minimum resolution of 300 pixels/inch. It is not allowed to submit them through the official Microsoft Office programs, imported into Word.

The name of the units of various sizes cuts such as “y.” (year) must be preceded by a non-breaking space (see. “Insert” – “Symbols”), indicating the prohibition on their separation from the numbers or words they define. The same is with the initials and surnames. The file (electronic version) of the article should be completely identical to the printed original.

The material should be presented in electronic and printed form (on one side of a standard A4 sheet).

Standard Design of the Paper (template)

Requirements for article’s elements

The numbers for the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC, https://teacode.com/online/udc/) have to be indicated at the beginning of an article.

This is followed by the title of the article, the initials and surnames of the authors, ORCID (in the absence, you must register at https://orcid.org/), the name of the institution (s) in which an article was performed.

The article should be provided:

– the full information about the author (authors), including a surname, a name, a patronymic, a scientific and academic degree, position, place of work or study (full name), e-mail, post address, phone. For the authors who do not have a scientific degree, the surname, the first name and the patronymic of the supervisor, his position, place of employment and specialty (name and number according to the classification of  Higher Attestation Commission) are additionally indicated;

– English version of the name and initials of the author(s);

– title of an article in Russian and English;

– the name of the institution (or institutions) in which an article was performed in Russian and English;

– the abstract of the article in Russian (150-250 words) and in English (150-250 words). The main idea should be clearly determined in the abstract (it should contain the relevance of the topic, the aim and object of the study, it should reveal its theoretical basis, the obtained results and their practical value);

– key words or phrases (5-7 words), required for indexing articles, in Russian and in English languages;

– the text of the article in Russian language signed by all authors. If the author doesn’t have a scientific degree, the article should also be signed by his supervisor;

– the section “Bibliography” and the section “References” containing the list of references, in which all sources are given in Latin, i.e. transliterated (http://translit.net/ru/), and are listed at the end of the article. The number of the source in the list of references and after comma – the page number (e.g. [3, p. 25]) is indicated in the text of the article in brackets. Sources should follow the order mentioned in the text. Be sure to specify the following data: for books – surname and initials of the author (editor), book title, place of publication (city), year of publication, total number of pages; for journal articles – surname and initials of the author, article title, journal title, year of publication, number, issue, pages (first and last one);

For sources published in foreign periodicals the DOI should be indicated (see, for example, the website: http://www.crossref.org).

The authors of the article are responsible for the correct list of references

All the quotes in the article should be correlated with the list of references. In case of direct quoting indicate page numbers.

Indicate the full output of the original text in translations.

Use superscript Arabic numerals to cite material in the text.

The factual material should reflect the latest data, it should be carefully checked and confirmed by references to sources.

Tables and other digital data should be checked carefully up and supplied by references to sources. Tables are given in the text, number and the name are specified above the table.

All abbreviations should be disclosed at the first reference.

The materials submitted to the Editorial Board must be carefully verified.

Special attention should be paid to the quality of translation of the abstract and keywords into English. The editors reserve the right to reject the article in case of a poor translation into English.

The translation of all metadata (information about the authors, article title, abstract, keywords) must be certified by a specialist of the Department of Foreign Languages, translation bureau, etc. (for example, «The translation corresponds to the original in Russian», the signature of the specialist, certified by the stamp of the organization in which he works).

Submitting an article to the Journal, the author (in the case of co-authorship – the author who is responsible for publication) guarantees that the text is original (it has not been published anywhere before and is not accepted for publication in other editions), he confirms his consent (in the case of co-authorship – the consent of all authors) with the rules of the Journal and transfers to the Editorial Board the right to publish the article, and to use the electronic version (to post on the Journal's website, etc.).

At the end of the article, the author (authors) must insert the following content:

«The presented material has never been published anywhere before and is currently not being reviewed for publication in other publications. The authors have no conflicts of interest related to this publication (if there are two or more authors). I do not mind (not objection) against placing the full-text version of the article in open access on the Internet. Date, signature of the author (authors), certified in the prescribed manner».

Articles of an applicable nature should be considered by the expert committee on the regime of secrecy with the provision of relevant information.

The author must attach to the set of documents consent to the processing of personal data

The articles of applicants and postgraduate are supervised by the scientific supervisor.

Signatures are certified by the stamp of the personnel department of the organization in which the author works.

Articles drawn up without taking into account the above requirements are not considered.

Redakciya zhurnala «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii» rukovodstvuetsya eticheskimi normami, prinyatymi mezhdunarodnym nauchnym soobschestvom. V svoey deyatel'nosti redakciya sleduet rekomendaciyam Komiteta po nauchnoy etike publikaciy (http://publicationethics.org/ ). Izdatel'stvo soblyudaet neytral'nuyu poziciyu po voprosam, opublikovannym v zhurnale.

Redakciya zhurnala «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii» rukovodstvuetsya eticheskimi normami, predlozhennymi Komitetom po etike nauchnyh publikaciy COPE, Evropeyskoy associacii nauchnyh redaktorov EASE (http://www.ease.org.uk/ ), Sovetom nauchnyh redaktorov CSE (http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/ ), Associacii nauchnyh redaktorov i izdateley ANRI (http://rasep.ru/ ).

Avtor stat'i, redaktor, recenzent, izdatel' obyazany soblyudat' eticheskie normy na vseh etapah publikacii, nachinaya ot predostavleniya stat'i i zakanchivaya ee publikaciey v zhurnale.

Eticheskim pravilam zhurnala dolzhny sledovat' avtory, recenzenty, chleny redakcionnoy kollegii, sotrudniki redakcii, a takzhe vse uchastniki processa publikacii informacii, predstavlyaemoy zhurnalom.

Glavnyy redaktor, chleny redakcionnoy kollegii, sotrudniki redakcii igrayut vazhnuyu rol' v razreshenii potencial'nyh sluchaev fabrikacii dannyh, fal'sifikacii, plagiata, manipulirovaniya izobrazheniyami, neetichnogo issledovaniya, predvzyato sostavlennyh otchetov, narusheniya avtorskogo prava, izbytochnoy ili dubliruyuschey publikacii i konflikta interesov.

Glavnyy redaktor osuschestvlyaet eticheskuyu podderzhku i kontrol':

• obespechivaet vypolnenie zaprosov chitateley i avtorov;

• obespechivaet vysokoe kachestvo publikuemyh materialov;

• garantiruet i obespechivaet svobodu vyrazheniya mneniy;

• obespechivaet cel'nost' publikuemyh nauchnyh materialov;

• v sluchae neobhodimosti obespechivaet publikaciyu popravok, raz'yasneniy, oproverzheniy i izvineniy.

Resheniya o publikacii ili otklonenii stat'i osnovyvayutsya isklyuchitel'no na ee cennosti, original'nosti, udobochitaemosti i sootvetstvii soderzhaniya tematike zhurnala.

V pravilah dlya avtorov i recenzentov, kotorye regulyarno peresmatrivayutsya i korrektiruyutsya, ukazyvayutsya pred'yavlyaemye k nim trebovaniya.

Glavnyy redaktor i sotrudniki redakcii obespechivayut pravo recenzentov na konfidencial'nost' ih raboty, konfidencial'nost' predstavlennyh materialov vplot' do ih publikacii, a takzhe svoevremenno reagiruyut na zhaloby.

V zhurnale vozmozhna publikaciya obosnovannoy kritiki opublikovannogo ranee materiala, esli ne budut predstavleny (glavnym redaktorom ili drugimi licami) ubeditel'nye prichiny vozderzhivat'sya ot takih publikaciy. Avtoru kritikuemyh materialov do publikacii kriticheskogo otzyva predostavlyaetsya vozmozhnost' oznakomit'sya s nim, a takzhe otvetit' na sdelannye zamechaniya.

Glavnyy redaktor i sotrudniki redakcii obyazany predprinimat' adekvatnye deystviya pri vozniknovenii podozreniya na narushenie eticheskih norm (zaprosit' raz'yasneniya ot avtorov i t.d.). Esli sootvetstvuyuschee rassledovanie vyyavlyaet fakt fal'sifikacii, stat'ya ne prinimaetsya k publikacii, a podobnyy sluchay dovoditsya do svedeniya chitateley.

Interesy (finansovye, personal'nye, politicheskie, religioznye) uchastnikov processa publikacii (avtorov, glavnogo redaktora, chlenov redkollegii i redsoveta, sotrudnikov redakcii, recenzentov i dr.), kotorye mogut povliyat' na predstavlenie i ob'ektivnuyu ocenku rezul'tatov issledovaniya, dolzhny byt' raskryty.

Nepravomernymi deystviyami schitayutsya:

• poddelka, fal'sifikaciya;

• plagiat (nezakonnoe prisvoenie intellektual'noy sobstvennosti, a takzhe znachitel'noe kopirovanie drugoy raboty);

• dublirovannaya ili izbytochnaya publikaciya (doslovnoe vosproizvedenie teksta drugoy publikacii togo zhe avtora v ob'eme, prevyshayuschem 30%).

Lyubye predyduschie publikacii dolzhny byt' raskryty v stat'e.

Zayavleniya o predpolagaemom nepravomernom deystvii, soderzhaschie podrobnye fakty dlya obosnovaniya pretenziy, dolzhny rassmatrivat'sya dazhe v sluchae ih anonimnosti.

Zhurnal pooschryaet obsuzhdenie i konstruktivnuyu kritiku opublikovannyh v nem rabot.

Pri rassmotrenii stat'i redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala provodit proverku materiala s pomosch'yu sistemy «Antiplagiat». Pri vyyavlenii zaimstvovaniy redakciya deystvuet v sootvetstvii s pravilami COPE.

Kodeks etiki nauchnyh publikaciy

Kodeks etiki nauchnyh publikaciy ob'edinyaet i raskryvaet obschie principy i pravila, kotorymi dolzhny rukovodstvovat'sya v svoih vzaimootnosheniyah uchastniki processa nauchnyh publikaciy: avtory, recenzenty, redaktory, izdateli, rasprostraniteli i chitateli.

Osnovnye terminy:

Etika nauchnyh publikaciy – eto sistema norm professional'nogo povedeniya vo vzaimootnosheniyah avtorov, recenzentov, redaktorov, izdateley i chitateley v processe sozdaniya, rasprostraneniya i ispol'zovaniya nauchnyh publikaciy.

Redaktor – predstavitel' nauchnogo zhurnala ili izdatel'stva, osuschestvlyayuschiy podgotovku materialov dlya publikacii, a takzhe podderzhivayuschiy obschenie s avtorami i chitatelyami nauchnyh publikaciy.

Avtor – eto lico ili gruppa lic (kollektiv avtorov), uchastvuyuschih v sozdanii publikacii rezul'tatov nauchnogo issledovaniya.

Recenzent – ekspert, deystvuyuschiy ot imeni nauchnogo zhurnala ili izdatel'stva i provodyaschiy nauchnuyu ekspertizu avtorskih materialov s cel'yu opredeleniya vozmozhnosti ih publikacii.

Izdatel' – yuridicheskoe ili fizicheskoe lico, osuschestvlyayuschie vypusk v svet nauchnoy publikacii.

Chitatel' – lyuboe lico, oznakomivsheesya s opublikovannymi materialami.

Plagiat – umyshlennoe prisvoenie avtorstva chuzhogo proizvedeniya nauki ili iskusstva, chuzhih idey ili izobreteniy. Plagiat mozhet byt' narusheniem avtorsko-pravovogo zakonodatel'stva i patentnogo zakonodatel'stva i v kachestve takovogo mozhet povlech' za soboy yuridicheskuyu otvetstvennost'.

Principy professional'noy etiki v deyatel'nosti redaktora i izdatelya

V svoey deyatel'nosti redaktor neset otvetstvennost' za obnarodovanie avtorskih proizvedeniy, v svyazi s chem rukovodstvuetsya sleduyuschimi osnovopolagayuschimi principami:

- pri prinyatii resheniya o publikacii redaktor nauchnogo zhurnala rukovodstvuetsya dostovernost'yu predstavleniya dannyh i nauchnoy znachimost'yu rassmatrivaemoy raboty;

- redaktor dolzhen ocenivat' intellektual'noe soderzhanie rukopisey vne zavisimosti ot rasy, pola, seksual'noy orientacii, religioznyh vzglyadov, proishozhdeniya, grazhdanstva, social'nogo polozheniya ili politicheskih predpochteniy avtorov;

- neopublikovannye dannye, poluchennye iz predstavlennyh k rassmotreniyu rukopisey, ne dolzhny ispol'zovat'sya dlya lichnyh celey ili peredavat'sya tret'im licam bez pis'mennogo soglasiya avtora. Informaciya ili idei, poluchennye v hode redaktirovaniya i svyazannye s vozmozhnymi preimuschestvami, dolzhny sohranyat'sya konfidencial'nymi, i ne ispol'zovat'sya s cel'yu polucheniya lichnoy vygody;

- redaktor ne dolzhen dopuskat' k publikacii informaciyu, esli imeetsya dostatochno osnovaniy polagat', chto ona yavlyaetsya plagiatom;

- redaktor sovmestno s izdatelem ne dolzhny ostavlyat' bez otveta pretenzii, kasayuschiesya rassmotrennyh rukopisey ili opublikovannyh materialov, a takzhe pri vyyavlenii konfliktnoy situacii prinimat' vse neobhodimye mery dlya vosstanovleniya narushennyh prav.

Eticheskie principy v deyatel'nosti recenzenta

Recenzent osuschestvlyaet nauchnuyu ekspertizu avtorskih materialov, vsledstvie chego ego deystviya dolzhny nosit' nepredvzyatyy harakter, zaklyuchayuschiysya v vypolnenii sleduyuschih principov:

- rukopis', poluchennaya dlya recenzirovaniya, dolzhna rassmatrivat'sya kak konfidencial'nyy dokument, kotoryy nel'zya peredavat' dlya oznakomleniya ili obsuzhdeniya tret'im licam, ne imeyuschim na to polnomochiy ot redakcii;

- recenzent obyazan davat' ob'ektivnuyu i argumentirovannuyu ocenku izlozhennym rezul'tatam issledovaniya. Personal'naya kritika avtora nepriemlema;

- neopublikovannye dannye, poluchennye iz predstavlennyh k rassmotreniyu rukopisey, ne dolzhny ispol'zovat'sya recenzentom dlya lichnyh celey;

- recenzent, kotoryy ne obladaet, po ego mneniyu, dostatochnoy kvalifikaciey dlya ocenki rukopisi, libo ne mozhet byt' ob'ektivnym, naprimer, v sluchae konflikta interesov s avtorom ili organizaciey, dolzhen soobschit' ob etom redaktoru s pros'boy isklyuchit' ego iz processa recenzirovaniya dannoy rukopisi.

Principy, kotorymi dolzhen rukovodstvovat'sya avtor nauchnyh publikaciy

Avtorom schitaetsya issledovatel', vnesshiy suschestvennyy intellektual'nyy vklad v publikuemuyu rabotu i predstavivshiy rezul'taty svoego issledovaniya. V sluchae soavtorstva kazhdyy avtor neset otvetstvennost' ne menee chem za odin komponent raboty i dolzhen imet' predstavlenie o vklade drugih lic. On dolzhen byt' polnost'yu uveren v kvalifikacii i professionalizme svoih soavtorov.

Vse lica, ukazyvaemye v kachestve avtorov, dolzhny sootvetstvovat' opredeleniyu avtorstva. Uchastie v rabote kazhdogo avtora dolzhno byt' dostatochno suschestvennym, tak kak kazhdyy avtor neset publichnuyu otvetstvennost' za ee sootvetstvuyuschiy komponent.

Avtory mogut zaklyuchat' otdel'nye, dopolnitel'nye dogovornye soglasheniya po rasprostraneniyu opublikovannoy raboty (naprimer, pomestit' ee v hranilische universiteta ili opublikovat' ee v knige), s priznaniem ee pervonachal'noy publikacii v etom zhurnale.

Vse lica, imeyuschie otnoshenie k rabote, no ne otvechayuschie kriteriyam avtorstva, perechislyayutsya v razdele «Vyrazhenie priznatel'nosti» / «Blagodarnosti» (lica, pomogavshie pri planirovanii issledovaniya, podbore materiala i ego analize, podgotovke rukopisi k pechati i t.d.).

Avtor ne imeet pravo napravlyat' odin i tot zhe tekst v raznye redakcii. Esli v stat'e ispol'zovana ranee opublikovannaya informaciya, avtor obyazan ukazat' ee istochnik, a po trebovaniyu redaktora predostavit' kopiyu citiruemogo materiala.

Avtoru neobhodimo podtverdit', chto ego stat'ya original'na, i ukazat' istochniki citiruemoy informacii.

Avtor obyazan zayavit' o potencial'nom konflikte interesov (naprimer, obstoyatel'stvah, kotorye, po ego mneniyu, mogut povliyat' na publikacionnyy process).

Pri obnaruzhenii znachitel'noy oshibki v publikacii, avtor obyazan nezamedlitel'no soobschit' ob etom redaktoru. Vo vremya podgotovki materiala k publikacii avtor obyazan sotrudnichat' s redaktorom i izdatelem i v sluchae neobhodimosti vvodit' v tekst sootvetstvuyuschie izmeneniya.

Avtor polnost'yu beret na sebya otvetstvennost' za vozmozhnyy plagiat teksta, risunkov i drugih materialov. Lyuboe narushenie avtorskih prav budet rassmotreno soglasno kriteriyam, predlozhennym COPE.

Avtor (ili kollektiv avtorov) osoznaet, chto neset pervonachal'nuyu otvetstvennost' za noviznu i dostovernost' rezul'tatov nauchnogo issledovaniya, chto predpolagaet soblyudenie sleduyuschih principov:

- avtory stat'i dolzhny predostavlyat' dostovernye rezul'taty provedennyh issledovaniy. Zavedomo oshibochnye ili sfal'sificirovannye utverzhdeniya nepriemlemy;

- avtory dolzhny garantirovat', chto rezul'taty issledovaniya, izlozhennye v predostavlennoy rukopisi, polnost'yu original'ny. Zaimstvovannye fragmenty ili utverzhdeniya dolzhny byt' oformleny s obyazatel'nym ukazaniem avtora i pervoistochnika. Chrezmernye zaimstvovaniya, a takzhe plagiat v lyubyh formah, vklyuchaya neoformlennye citaty, perefrazirovanie ili prisvoenie prav na rezul'taty chuzhih issledovaniy, neetichny i nepriemlemy;

- neobhodimo priznavat' vklad vseh lic, tak ili inache povliyavshih na hod issledovaniya, v chastnosti, v stat'e dolzhny byt' predstavleny ssylki na raboty, kotorye imeli znachenie pri provedenii issledovaniya;

- avtory ne dolzhny predostavlyat' v zhurnal rukopis', kotoraya byla otpravlena v drugoy zhurnal i nahoditsya na rassmotrenii, a takzhe stat'yu, uzhe opublikovannuyu v drugom zhurnale;

- soavtorami stat'i dolzhny byt' ukazany vse lica, vnesshie suschestvennyy vklad v provedenie issledovaniya. Sredi soavtorov nedopustimo ukazyvat' lic, ne uchastvovavshih v issledovanii;

- esli avtor obnaruzhit suschestvennye oshibki ili netochnosti v stat'e na etape ee rassmotreniya ili posle ee opublikovaniya, on dolzhen kak mozhno skoree uvedomit' ob etom redakciyu zhurnala.

Konflikt interesov

Stolknovenie interesov voznikaet, esli avtor (ili uchrezhdenie, v kotorom on/ona rabotaet), recenzent, redaktor ili lyuboy uchastnik processa podgotovki publikacii imeyut finansovye ili chastnye interesy (lichnye otnosheniya, nauchnoe sopernichestvo, intellektual'nye raznoglasiya i dr.), kotorye mogut negativno otrazit'sya na ih deystviyah.

Recenzenty predostavlyayut redakcii informaciyu o vozmozhnyh konfliktah interesov, kotorye mogut povliyat' na ih mnenie otnositel'no rukopisi. Pri nalichii takoy opasnosti oni vozderzhivayutsya ot recenzirovaniya dannogo materiala. Recenzenty ne mogut ispol'zovat' v sobstvennyh interesah rezul'taty rassmatrivaemoy raboty do ee publikacii.

Vse uchastniki processa podgotovki stat'i k publikacii obyazany raskryvat' informaciyu o lyubyh vzaimootnosheniyah, kotorye mogut rassmatrivat'sya kak potencial'nyy istochnik konflikta interesov.

Redakciya publikuet takuyu informaciyu, esli schitaet, chto ona mozhet okazat' vliyanie na ocenku rukopisi.

Data podgotovki dokumenta – 28.12.2017

1. The results of original fundamental and applied scientific researches on legal, pedagogical and psychological problems in relation to law enforcement are published in the Journal «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii».

The criteria for the selection of articles are compliance with the profile of the journal, novelty, relevance and validity of the results. Submitted manuscripts are not returned back. It is not allowed to send works to the editorial office that are published and / or accepted for publication in other editions. By submitting an article to the editor, the author agrees to an editorial revision of the material.

2. The work on the formation of the issue is carried out by the editorial board of the journal, which include Russian and foreign experts. The journal is published by the editorial board.

3. The journal is peer-reviewed. The reviewers are recognized qualified Russian and foreign experts in relevant fields of knowledge.

4. The Editorial Board provides for the review of all scientific materials, controls the compliance of the authors with the rules for the composition of articles.

5. Authors, reviewers, the Editorial Board and the editors of the journal comply with the provisions of the publication ethics.

6. The journal publishes, free of charge and without payment of the author's fee, up-to-date, original, objective and reasonable scientific materials, which were first sent to the press. The journal does not publish journalistic, popular and educational texts, advertising and other non-core materials.

7. The Editorial Board has the right to edit the title and text of scientific material, bibliography.

8. When forming the journal number, preference is given to materials:

– corresponding to the thematic profile and rubrics of the journal;

– containing a clear description of the problem and a reasoned author's version of its resolution;

– having an original character (prepared by the authors independently and not previously published);

– having a novelty of research (based on the results of their own scientific research and present new scientific knowledge);

– having a scientific presentation style (general language literacy, consistency, consistency, clarity, special terminology, the availability of references, etc.)

9. The article is submitted to the editors of the journal in printed and electronic form (through a personal account on the website of the Journal https://vestnikspbmvd.ru or by e-mail vestnik@univermvd.ru). Article is issued in accordance with the requirements for scientific articles in the Journal «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii».

10. The received article is registered in the articles registration journal with indication of the date of receipt, title, full name of an author(s). An individual registration number is assigned to an article.

11. After registration, the article is sent to the initial assessment by the editor-in-chief (assistant editor-in-chief), who appoints reviewers for the article.

12. After assigning reviewers, the personal data of the author (s) is deleted from the article. As such, the article is e-mailed to reviewers.

13. After conducting an expert assessment of the article, the reviewer sends to the editor a formed review.

14. The decision to publish an article is made by the Editorial Board of the Journal, depending on the results of the review and verification of the text of the manuscript for originality using specialized software.

With the originality of the text below 70% (while borrowing from one source can not be more than 7%, the borrowing is not allowed in the conclusions), the article is rejected.

No more than one article by one author, including the co-authorship, can be published in one issue of the Journal.

15. The editorial board sends an email to the author (s) about the decision taken on the article: publish, publish after revision, the letter provides recommendations for revision.

If it is decided to reject the publication, the reasons for such a decision are indicated.

The article, revised by the author according to the recommendations of the reviewer, is sent by the editors to the same reviewer for a second review.

16. If the article is recommended for publication, it undergoes editorial preparation – technical and literary editing, proofreading. The final version of the article prepared for publication, if necessary, is agreed with the author (s).

17. The next issue of the Journal includes articles in relation to which at the beginning of the layout (in accordance with the production schedule) there are reviews recommending publication and agreed with the author (s).

18. The Journal is a quarterly publication; coming out in March, June, September and December.

19. Distribution of the journal is carried out in accordance with the distribution list.

20. In accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, compulsory free copies of the journal are distributed.

21. Each issue of Journal are received by the University library.

22. Issues of Journal are distributed to the authors of articles and members of the Editorial Board in electronic form (sent by e-mail).

23. The copyrights to all materials published in the Journal belong to the founder and publisher.

24. The authors guarantee the Journal the right to reproduce unique materials in their work. In the case of unauthorized use by the authors of materials, the rights to which belong to third parties, the authors of the manuscript are responsible for their reproduction.

The Journal reviews all materials submitted to the Editorial Board that are relevant to its topic in order to give expert evaluation. All peer-reviewers are recognized experts on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and have their own publications on the subject of the article under review during the last 3 years.

1. The form of the peer-review is double-blind.

2. The review of the supervisor (scientific supervisor) or the research adviser does not replace the peer-review.

3. The peer-reviewing of articles is free of charge for the authors.

4. The manuscript of a scientific paper, accepted by the Editorial Board in printed and electronic form, is considered by the editor-in-chief for compliance to the profile of the Journal, the requirements of article submission guidelines and is registered in the article registration logbook.

5. The submitted manuscript is considered during one month by the Editorial Board for compliance with the formal requirements of the Editorial Board of the Journal and after approval it is sent for a peer-review. The editor-in-chief (the deputy editor-in-chief) chooses the peer-reviewers.

6. Candidates and doctors of sciences including expert practitioners (practicians) with recognized authority and working in the scientific field relevant to articles topics are involved in peer-reviewing. The peer-review is signed by a specialist with an interpretation of the surname, name and patronymic, an indication of a scientific degree, academic rank, position, date of peer-review.

7. The peer-reviewer cannot be the author or co-author of the article under peer-reviewing, as well as (scientific) supervisor of the applicant for an academic degree and employees of the department where the author works.

8. The peer-reviewers are notified that the manuscripts submitted to them are intellectual property of the authors and are classified as the data that are not subject to disclosure, it is not allowed to make copies of the articles.

9. Infringement of confidentiality of information about the peer-reviewers and the authors of the articles is possible only in case of the peer-reviewer’s statement for unauthenticity or falsification of the materials made in the manuscript.

10. The term of preparing the peer-review is established in coordination with the peer-reviewer, but it cannot exceed two weeks from the moment of the manuscript receipt to the peer-reviewer (Reviewer's memo).

11. The peer-review should contain the qualified analysis of the material of the article, the objective and substantiated estimation of its material and reasonable recommendations about the improvement of quality of work. The peer-reviewer estimates the basic merits and demerits of the manuscript of the article, being guided thus by following criteria: conformity of the maintenance of the article to the Journal profile, relevance of the selected research topic, scientific and methodical level, use of necessary techniques of research, novelty and originality of fundamental principles and conclusions, practical use.

12. The peer-review is made under the standard form (Appendix 1) or in the free form with obligatory indication of the following matters:

- general analysis of the scientific level, terminology, structure of the article, the relevance of the research topic;

- scientific style, conformity of the methods, techniques, recommendations and results of researches used by the author to modern achievements of science and practice;

- the validity of the statement of the problem (issue) or the obtained results for the further development of theory and practice in the field of the research;

- discrepancies, errors, infringement of rules of citing admitted by the author;

- estimation of completeness of the article concerning language and style, its conformity to the established editorial requirements.

The final part of the peer-review should contain general conclusions and recommendation about expediency of its publication in the Journal or about the necessity of its completion.

13. In the case of a negative peer-review of the article in whole (the recommendation about inexpediency of its publication) the peer-reviewer should prove his conclusions. In the case of discrepancy of the article to one or several criteria the peer-reviewer specifies the necessity of completion of the article and makes recommendations to the author on the article improvement (with indication of errors admitted by the author).

14. The Editorial Board submits the results of the peer-review to the author (sends the copies of the peer-reviews or a reasoned refusal) and sends copies of the peer-reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation upon receipt of the relevant request to the Editorial Board.

15. Articles completed by the author repeatedly go to the peer-reviewer who has made critical comments.

16. In the case the author disagrees with the peer-reviewer’s opinion he or she may apply for re-reviewing or withdraw the article. This fact is fixed in a special register.

17. In the case of negative peer-review the article is transferred to another peer-reviewer who doesn’t know about the results of the previous peer-review. In the case of negative re-reviewing the copies of the negative peer-reviews go to the author to complete the article.

18. The final decision about expediency of the article publication after peer-reviewing is taken by the Editorial Board.

19. The cases of article reject:

- the theme of the article does not correspond with the scope of the Journal;

- the article is not adjusted properly and the authors refuse to update the articles;

- the article is not completed by the author after the peer-review.

20. The terms of article peer-reviewing are not longer than 3 months.

21. The peer-reviews are kept within 5 years since the moment of the peer-reviewer’s assent.

22. The articles accepted for the publication are not given back to the authors.

Poryadok otzyva (retrakcii) stat'i v zhurnale «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii»

(razrabotan na osnove rekomendaciy Soveta po etike nauchnyh publikaciy Associacii nauchnyh redaktorov i izdateley)

1. Otzyv teksta ot publikacii (retrakciya) predstavlyaet soboy mehanizm ispravleniya opublikovannoy informacii i opovescheniya chitateley o tom, chto publikaciya soderzhit ser'eznye nedostatki ili oshibochnye dannye, kotorym nel'zya doveryat'. Nedostovernost' dannyh mozhet yavlyat'sya rezul'tatom dobrosovestnogo zabluzhdeniya ili osoznannyh narusheniy. Retrakciya ispol'zuetsya i v sluchae obnaruzheniya dubliruyuschih publikaciy, plagiata, sokrytiya konflikta interesov, kotorye mogli povliyat' na interpretaciyu dannyh ili rekomendacii ob ih ispol'zovanii.

2. Osnovaniem dlya otzyva stat'i yavlyayutsya sleduyuschie fakty:

• obnaruzhenie nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy (plagiata) v publikacii;
• dublirovanie stat'i v neskol'kih izdaniyah;
• obnaruzhenie v rabote fal'sifikaciy ili fabrikaciy (naprimer, podtasovka eksperimental'nyh dannyh);
• obnaruzhenie v rabote ser'eznyh oshibok (naprimer, nepravil'naya interpretaciya rezul'tatov), chto stavit pod somnenie ee nauchnuyu cennost';
• nekorrektnyy sostav avtorov (vklyucheny lica, ne prinimavshie uchastie v napisanii stat'i, provedenii issledovaniya i t.d.; ne ukazany lica, prinimavshie neposredstvennoe uchastie v provedenii issledovaniya i napisanii stat'i);
• skryt konflikt interesov;
• perepublikaciya stat'i bez soglasiya avtora;
• stat'ya ne prohodila proceduru recenzirovaniya.

3. Iniciatorom nachala procedury otzyva (retrakcii) stat'i mogut byt':

• avtor(y) stat'i, kotoryy napravlyaet pis'mennoe motivirovannoe obraschenie v redakciyu zhurnala ob otzyve stat'i;
• glavnyy redaktor zhurnala, kotoryy gotovit obosnovannoe predstavlenie o prichinah otzyva publikacii;
• redakciya drugogo zhurnala, napravivshaya zapros v redakciyu zhurnala «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii»;
• inye lica, predstavivshie dokazatel'stva narusheniya nauchnoy etiki avtorom(ami) stat'i (naprimer, uchastniki konflikta interesov).

4. Otzyv (retrakciya) statey v zhurnale «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii» osuschestvlyaetsya sleduyuschim obrazom:

4.1. Posle obrascheniya avtora ili drugogo lica, predostavivshego fakty narusheniya nauchnoy etiki v stat'e, redkollegiya zhurnala naznachaet komissiyu, kotoraya provodit vsestoronnee izuchenie sluchaya, s uchetom vseh imeyuschihsya faktov i vozmozhnostey proverki etichnosti publikacii;

4.2. Prinyav reshenie otozvat' stat'yu, redakciya ukazyvaet v protokole zasedaniya prichinu retrakcii (v sluchae obnaruzheniya plagiata - s ukazaniem na istochniki zaimstvovaniya), a takzhe datu retrakcii. Stat'ya i opisanie stat'i ostayutsya na internet-sayte zhurnala v sostave sootvetstvuyuschego vypuska zhurnala, no na elektronnuyu versiyu teksta nanositsya nadpis' OTOZVANA/RETRACTED i data retrakcii, eta zhe pometa stavitsya pri stat'e v oglavlenii vypuska. 

4.3. Redakciya ne udalyaet mehanicheski stat'i iz elektronnoy versii zhurnala i iz arhiva na sayte zhurnala, dlya soblyudeniya korrektnosti.

4.4. V Sovet po etike nauchnyh publikaciy Associacii nauchnyh redaktorov i izdateley (dlya vneseniya informacii v edinuyu bazu retragirovannyh statey) predostavlyaetsya protokol, v kotorom ukazyvaetsya data provedeniya zasedaniya, sostav zasedavshih, rezul'taty ekspertizy, obosnovannoe reshenie i zapolnennaya forma:

- FIO avtora i nazvanie stat'i;

- nazvanie izdaniya, iz kotorogo tekst otzyvaetsya;

- iniciator otzyva stat'i; 

- osnovanie dlya otzyva stat'i i data prinyatiya resheniya;

- ssylka na stranicu na sayte izdaniya, na kotoroy dana informaciya o retrakcii;

- vyhodnye dannye stat' i DOI (esli est');

- tematika (social'nye nauki; sel'skoe hozyaystvo i t.p.).

4.5. Informaciya ob otozvannyh tekstah peredaetsya v bazy nauchnoy informacii - NEB, KiberLeninka. Pri poluchenii zayavki na retrakciyu informaciya o stat'e i polnyy tekst ostayutsya na eLibrary.ru i v KiberLeninke, no dopolnyaetsya informaciey o retrakcii. Otozvannye stat'i i ssylki iz nih isklyuchayutsya iz RINC i ne uchastvuyut pri raschete pokazateley.

4.6. V sluchae ser'eznogo moral'nogo uscherba storonam konflikta interesov informaciya o fakte narusheniya nauchnoy etiki mozhet byt' peredana po mestu raboty avtora.

4.7. Redakciya ostavlyaet za soboy pravo prinimat' samostoyatel'no reshenie otnositel'no dal'neyshego sotrudnichestva s avtorami retragirovannyh statey (polnyy otkaz ot sotrudnichestva, otkaz ot sotrudnichestva na opredelennoe vremya, naznachenie dopolnitel'noy ekspertizy statey v sluchae povtornogo sotrudnichestva).

Obsuzhden i utverzhden na zasedanii redakcionnoy kollegii zhurnala (protokol № 2 ot 16.05.2019)

Plata za publikaciyu i recenzirovanie statey otsutstvuet

Download template Consent to the processing of personal data

The mission of the journal is to unite scientists and practitioners who conduct research on topical issues of legal science, pedagogy and psychology as applied to law enforcement. The objectives of the journal - the dissemination of scientific achievements, the integration of scientific research in the field of jurisprudence and practical achievements of law enforcement agencies.

Subject-matter of the journal. The results of original fundamental and applied scientific researches on legal, pedagogical and psychological problems in relation to law enforcement are published in the Journal «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii».

Criteria for selection of articles are: appropriate profile of the Journal, novelty, relevance and validity of the results. Submitted manuscripts will not be returned. It is not allowed to send to the Editorial Board the papers that have been already published and/or accepted for publication previously in other editions. By submitting an article to the Editorial Board, the author agrees to the editorial corrections of the material.

All submitted to the Editorial Board materials are checked for the presence of borrowings from public sources, the validation is performed using the system «AntiPlagiat».

Article processing charge is absent. 

Received articles are registered. The date of registration is the day of the provision of a complete set of materials. If the article is returned to the author for revision, then the date of its registration is considered the day of receipt of the final text.

Received articles are reviewed.

The editors reserve the right to literary editing of the article.

Not accepted for publication materials are not returned to the authors.

Language and geography of the Journal. The main language of the Journal is Russian. Metadata of the articles are published in Russian and English. The geography of the journal’s authors includes both Russian and foreign authors. Articles of foreign authors are published in English, which allows to expand the geography of readers and strengthen the integration processes in the global scientific community.

Format requirements for scientific articles:

– Volume – 10-20 pages of typewritten text (the standard page is 1800 symbols with spaces, including tables, pictures and references).

– The text editor Word and font Times New Roman should be used when typing an article (Type size – 14; Line spacing – 1.5 cm; Indentation – 1.25 cm; Margins: left ‒ 2.5 cm, right ‒ 1.5 cm, top and bottom ‒ 2.0 cm). If additional fonts were used when typing, the author must provide them to the editorial department;

– Alignment – portrait;

– Page numbering (except first page) – left bottom;

It is not allowed to use manual hyphenation and spaces.

In the Russian language text «French quotations symbols» are used for quotations and in the text in foreign languages – “curly quotes”.

Illustrations (pictures, tables, graphs, charts, etc.) are submitted separately (as separate files fragment and on separate pages in printed form). The recommended width of the drawing should not exceed 14 cm, the height should not exceed 18 cm. The recommended format is *jpg. Illustrative materials should have a minimum resolution of 300 pixels/inch. It is not allowed to submit them through the official Microsoft Office programs, imported into Word.

The name of the units of various sizes cuts such as “y.” (year) must be preceded by a non-breaking space (see. “Insert” – “Symbols”), indicating the prohibition on their separation from the numbers or words they define. The same is with the initials and surnames. The file (electronic version) of the article should be completely identical to the printed original.

The material should be presented in electronic and printed form (on one side of a standard A4 sheet).

Standard Design of the Paper (template)

Requirements for article’s elements

The numbers for the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC, https://teacode.com/online/udc/) have to be indicated at the beginning of an article.

This is followed by the title of the article, the initials and surnames of the authors, ORCID (in the absence, you must register at https://orcid.org/), the name of the institution (s) in which an article was performed.

The article should be provided:

– the full information about the author (authors), including a surname, a name, a patronymic, a scientific and academic degree, position, place of work or study (full name), e-mail, post address, phone. For the authors who do not have a scientific degree, the surname, the first name and the patronymic of the supervisor, his position, place of employment and specialty (name and number according to the classification of  Higher Attestation Commission) are additionally indicated;

– English version of the name and initials of the author(s);

– title of an article in Russian and English;

– the name of the institution (or institutions) in which an article was performed in Russian and English;

– the abstract of the article in Russian (150-250 words) and in English (150-250 words). The main idea should be clearly determined in the abstract (it should contain the relevance of the topic, the aim and object of the study, it should reveal its theoretical basis, the obtained results and their practical value);

– key words or phrases (5-7 words), required for indexing articles, in Russian and in English languages;

– the text of the article in Russian language signed by all authors. If the author doesn’t have a scientific degree, the article should also be signed by his supervisor;

– the section “Bibliography” and the section “References” containing the list of references, in which all sources are given in Latin, i.e. transliterated (http://translit.net/ru/), and are listed at the end of the article. The number of the source in the list of references and after comma – the page number (e.g. [3, p. 25]) is indicated in the text of the article in brackets. Sources should follow the order mentioned in the text. Be sure to specify the following data: for books – surname and initials of the author (editor), book title, place of publication (city), year of publication, total number of pages; for journal articles – surname and initials of the author, article title, journal title, year of publication, number, issue, pages (first and last one);

For sources published in foreign periodicals the DOI should be indicated (see, for example, the website: http://www.crossref.org).

The authors of the article are responsible for the correct list of references

All the quotes in the article should be correlated with the list of references. In case of direct quoting indicate page numbers.

Indicate the full output of the original text in translations.

Use superscript Arabic numerals to cite material in the text.

The factual material should reflect the latest data, it should be carefully checked and confirmed by references to sources.

Tables and other digital data should be checked carefully up and supplied by references to sources. Tables are given in the text, number and the name are specified above the table.

All abbreviations should be disclosed at the first reference.

The materials submitted to the Editorial Board must be carefully verified.

Special attention should be paid to the quality of translation of the abstract and keywords into English. The editors reserve the right to reject the article in case of a poor translation into English.

The translation of all metadata (information about the authors, article title, abstract, keywords) must be certified by a specialist of the Department of Foreign Languages, translation bureau, etc. (for example, «The translation corresponds to the original in Russian», the signature of the specialist, certified by the stamp of the organization in which he works).

Submitting an article to the Journal, the author (in the case of co-authorship – the author who is responsible for publication) guarantees that the text is original (it has not been published anywhere before and is not accepted for publication in other editions), he confirms his consent (in the case of co-authorship – the consent of all authors) with the rules of the Journal and transfers to the Editorial Board the right to publish the article, and to use the electronic version (to post on the Journal's website, etc.).

At the end of the article, the author (authors) must insert the following content:

«The presented material has never been published anywhere before and is currently not being reviewed for publication in other publications. The authors have no conflicts of interest related to this publication (if there are two or more authors). I do not mind (not objection) against placing the full-text version of the article in open access on the Internet. Date, signature of the author (authors), certified in the prescribed manner».

Articles of an applicable nature should be considered by the expert committee on the regime of secrecy with the provision of relevant information.

The author must attach to the set of documents consent to the processing of personal data

The articles of applicants and postgraduate are supervised by the scientific supervisor.

Signatures are certified by the stamp of the personnel department of the organization in which the author works.

Articles drawn up without taking into account the above requirements are not considered.

Redakciya zhurnala «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii» rukovodstvuetsya eticheskimi normami, prinyatymi mezhdunarodnym nauchnym soobschestvom. V svoey deyatel'nosti redakciya sleduet rekomendaciyam Komiteta po nauchnoy etike publikaciy (http://publicationethics.org/ ). Izdatel'stvo soblyudaet neytral'nuyu poziciyu po voprosam, opublikovannym v zhurnale.

Redakciya zhurnala «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii» rukovodstvuetsya eticheskimi normami, predlozhennymi Komitetom po etike nauchnyh publikaciy COPE, Evropeyskoy associacii nauchnyh redaktorov EASE (http://www.ease.org.uk/ ), Sovetom nauchnyh redaktorov CSE (http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/ ), Associacii nauchnyh redaktorov i izdateley ANRI (http://rasep.ru/ ).

Avtor stat'i, redaktor, recenzent, izdatel' obyazany soblyudat' eticheskie normy na vseh etapah publikacii, nachinaya ot predostavleniya stat'i i zakanchivaya ee publikaciey v zhurnale.

Eticheskim pravilam zhurnala dolzhny sledovat' avtory, recenzenty, chleny redakcionnoy kollegii, sotrudniki redakcii, a takzhe vse uchastniki processa publikacii informacii, predstavlyaemoy zhurnalom.

Glavnyy redaktor, chleny redakcionnoy kollegii, sotrudniki redakcii igrayut vazhnuyu rol' v razreshenii potencial'nyh sluchaev fabrikacii dannyh, fal'sifikacii, plagiata, manipulirovaniya izobrazheniyami, neetichnogo issledovaniya, predvzyato sostavlennyh otchetov, narusheniya avtorskogo prava, izbytochnoy ili dubliruyuschey publikacii i konflikta interesov.

Glavnyy redaktor osuschestvlyaet eticheskuyu podderzhku i kontrol':

• obespechivaet vypolnenie zaprosov chitateley i avtorov;

• obespechivaet vysokoe kachestvo publikuemyh materialov;

• garantiruet i obespechivaet svobodu vyrazheniya mneniy;

• obespechivaet cel'nost' publikuemyh nauchnyh materialov;

• v sluchae neobhodimosti obespechivaet publikaciyu popravok, raz'yasneniy, oproverzheniy i izvineniy.

Resheniya o publikacii ili otklonenii stat'i osnovyvayutsya isklyuchitel'no na ee cennosti, original'nosti, udobochitaemosti i sootvetstvii soderzhaniya tematike zhurnala.

V pravilah dlya avtorov i recenzentov, kotorye regulyarno peresmatrivayutsya i korrektiruyutsya, ukazyvayutsya pred'yavlyaemye k nim trebovaniya.

Glavnyy redaktor i sotrudniki redakcii obespechivayut pravo recenzentov na konfidencial'nost' ih raboty, konfidencial'nost' predstavlennyh materialov vplot' do ih publikacii, a takzhe svoevremenno reagiruyut na zhaloby.

V zhurnale vozmozhna publikaciya obosnovannoy kritiki opublikovannogo ranee materiala, esli ne budut predstavleny (glavnym redaktorom ili drugimi licami) ubeditel'nye prichiny vozderzhivat'sya ot takih publikaciy. Avtoru kritikuemyh materialov do publikacii kriticheskogo otzyva predostavlyaetsya vozmozhnost' oznakomit'sya s nim, a takzhe otvetit' na sdelannye zamechaniya.

Glavnyy redaktor i sotrudniki redakcii obyazany predprinimat' adekvatnye deystviya pri vozniknovenii podozreniya na narushenie eticheskih norm (zaprosit' raz'yasneniya ot avtorov i t.d.). Esli sootvetstvuyuschee rassledovanie vyyavlyaet fakt fal'sifikacii, stat'ya ne prinimaetsya k publikacii, a podobnyy sluchay dovoditsya do svedeniya chitateley.

Interesy (finansovye, personal'nye, politicheskie, religioznye) uchastnikov processa publikacii (avtorov, glavnogo redaktora, chlenov redkollegii i redsoveta, sotrudnikov redakcii, recenzentov i dr.), kotorye mogut povliyat' na predstavlenie i ob'ektivnuyu ocenku rezul'tatov issledovaniya, dolzhny byt' raskryty.

Nepravomernymi deystviyami schitayutsya:

• poddelka, fal'sifikaciya;

• plagiat (nezakonnoe prisvoenie intellektual'noy sobstvennosti, a takzhe znachitel'noe kopirovanie drugoy raboty);

• dublirovannaya ili izbytochnaya publikaciya (doslovnoe vosproizvedenie teksta drugoy publikacii togo zhe avtora v ob'eme, prevyshayuschem 30%).

Lyubye predyduschie publikacii dolzhny byt' raskryty v stat'e.

Zayavleniya o predpolagaemom nepravomernom deystvii, soderzhaschie podrobnye fakty dlya obosnovaniya pretenziy, dolzhny rassmatrivat'sya dazhe v sluchae ih anonimnosti.

Zhurnal pooschryaet obsuzhdenie i konstruktivnuyu kritiku opublikovannyh v nem rabot.

Pri rassmotrenii stat'i redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala provodit proverku materiala s pomosch'yu sistemy «Antiplagiat». Pri vyyavlenii zaimstvovaniy redakciya deystvuet v sootvetstvii s pravilami COPE.

Kodeks etiki nauchnyh publikaciy

Kodeks etiki nauchnyh publikaciy ob'edinyaet i raskryvaet obschie principy i pravila, kotorymi dolzhny rukovodstvovat'sya v svoih vzaimootnosheniyah uchastniki processa nauchnyh publikaciy: avtory, recenzenty, redaktory, izdateli, rasprostraniteli i chitateli.

Osnovnye terminy:

Etika nauchnyh publikaciy – eto sistema norm professional'nogo povedeniya vo vzaimootnosheniyah avtorov, recenzentov, redaktorov, izdateley i chitateley v processe sozdaniya, rasprostraneniya i ispol'zovaniya nauchnyh publikaciy.

Redaktor – predstavitel' nauchnogo zhurnala ili izdatel'stva, osuschestvlyayuschiy podgotovku materialov dlya publikacii, a takzhe podderzhivayuschiy obschenie s avtorami i chitatelyami nauchnyh publikaciy.

Avtor – eto lico ili gruppa lic (kollektiv avtorov), uchastvuyuschih v sozdanii publikacii rezul'tatov nauchnogo issledovaniya.

Recenzent – ekspert, deystvuyuschiy ot imeni nauchnogo zhurnala ili izdatel'stva i provodyaschiy nauchnuyu ekspertizu avtorskih materialov s cel'yu opredeleniya vozmozhnosti ih publikacii.

Izdatel' – yuridicheskoe ili fizicheskoe lico, osuschestvlyayuschie vypusk v svet nauchnoy publikacii.

Chitatel' – lyuboe lico, oznakomivsheesya s opublikovannymi materialami.

Plagiat – umyshlennoe prisvoenie avtorstva chuzhogo proizvedeniya nauki ili iskusstva, chuzhih idey ili izobreteniy. Plagiat mozhet byt' narusheniem avtorsko-pravovogo zakonodatel'stva i patentnogo zakonodatel'stva i v kachestve takovogo mozhet povlech' za soboy yuridicheskuyu otvetstvennost'.

Principy professional'noy etiki v deyatel'nosti redaktora i izdatelya

V svoey deyatel'nosti redaktor neset otvetstvennost' za obnarodovanie avtorskih proizvedeniy, v svyazi s chem rukovodstvuetsya sleduyuschimi osnovopolagayuschimi principami:

- pri prinyatii resheniya o publikacii redaktor nauchnogo zhurnala rukovodstvuetsya dostovernost'yu predstavleniya dannyh i nauchnoy znachimost'yu rassmatrivaemoy raboty;

- redaktor dolzhen ocenivat' intellektual'noe soderzhanie rukopisey vne zavisimosti ot rasy, pola, seksual'noy orientacii, religioznyh vzglyadov, proishozhdeniya, grazhdanstva, social'nogo polozheniya ili politicheskih predpochteniy avtorov;

- neopublikovannye dannye, poluchennye iz predstavlennyh k rassmotreniyu rukopisey, ne dolzhny ispol'zovat'sya dlya lichnyh celey ili peredavat'sya tret'im licam bez pis'mennogo soglasiya avtora. Informaciya ili idei, poluchennye v hode redaktirovaniya i svyazannye s vozmozhnymi preimuschestvami, dolzhny sohranyat'sya konfidencial'nymi, i ne ispol'zovat'sya s cel'yu polucheniya lichnoy vygody;

- redaktor ne dolzhen dopuskat' k publikacii informaciyu, esli imeetsya dostatochno osnovaniy polagat', chto ona yavlyaetsya plagiatom;

- redaktor sovmestno s izdatelem ne dolzhny ostavlyat' bez otveta pretenzii, kasayuschiesya rassmotrennyh rukopisey ili opublikovannyh materialov, a takzhe pri vyyavlenii konfliktnoy situacii prinimat' vse neobhodimye mery dlya vosstanovleniya narushennyh prav.

Eticheskie principy v deyatel'nosti recenzenta

Recenzent osuschestvlyaet nauchnuyu ekspertizu avtorskih materialov, vsledstvie chego ego deystviya dolzhny nosit' nepredvzyatyy harakter, zaklyuchayuschiysya v vypolnenii sleduyuschih principov:

- rukopis', poluchennaya dlya recenzirovaniya, dolzhna rassmatrivat'sya kak konfidencial'nyy dokument, kotoryy nel'zya peredavat' dlya oznakomleniya ili obsuzhdeniya tret'im licam, ne imeyuschim na to polnomochiy ot redakcii;

- recenzent obyazan davat' ob'ektivnuyu i argumentirovannuyu ocenku izlozhennym rezul'tatam issledovaniya. Personal'naya kritika avtora nepriemlema;

- neopublikovannye dannye, poluchennye iz predstavlennyh k rassmotreniyu rukopisey, ne dolzhny ispol'zovat'sya recenzentom dlya lichnyh celey;

- recenzent, kotoryy ne obladaet, po ego mneniyu, dostatochnoy kvalifikaciey dlya ocenki rukopisi, libo ne mozhet byt' ob'ektivnym, naprimer, v sluchae konflikta interesov s avtorom ili organizaciey, dolzhen soobschit' ob etom redaktoru s pros'boy isklyuchit' ego iz processa recenzirovaniya dannoy rukopisi.

Principy, kotorymi dolzhen rukovodstvovat'sya avtor nauchnyh publikaciy

Avtorom schitaetsya issledovatel', vnesshiy suschestvennyy intellektual'nyy vklad v publikuemuyu rabotu i predstavivshiy rezul'taty svoego issledovaniya. V sluchae soavtorstva kazhdyy avtor neset otvetstvennost' ne menee chem za odin komponent raboty i dolzhen imet' predstavlenie o vklade drugih lic. On dolzhen byt' polnost'yu uveren v kvalifikacii i professionalizme svoih soavtorov.

Vse lica, ukazyvaemye v kachestve avtorov, dolzhny sootvetstvovat' opredeleniyu avtorstva. Uchastie v rabote kazhdogo avtora dolzhno byt' dostatochno suschestvennym, tak kak kazhdyy avtor neset publichnuyu otvetstvennost' za ee sootvetstvuyuschiy komponent.

Avtory mogut zaklyuchat' otdel'nye, dopolnitel'nye dogovornye soglasheniya po rasprostraneniyu opublikovannoy raboty (naprimer, pomestit' ee v hranilische universiteta ili opublikovat' ee v knige), s priznaniem ee pervonachal'noy publikacii v etom zhurnale.

Vse lica, imeyuschie otnoshenie k rabote, no ne otvechayuschie kriteriyam avtorstva, perechislyayutsya v razdele «Vyrazhenie priznatel'nosti» / «Blagodarnosti» (lica, pomogavshie pri planirovanii issledovaniya, podbore materiala i ego analize, podgotovke rukopisi k pechati i t.d.).

Avtor ne imeet pravo napravlyat' odin i tot zhe tekst v raznye redakcii. Esli v stat'e ispol'zovana ranee opublikovannaya informaciya, avtor obyazan ukazat' ee istochnik, a po trebovaniyu redaktora predostavit' kopiyu citiruemogo materiala.

Avtoru neobhodimo podtverdit', chto ego stat'ya original'na, i ukazat' istochniki citiruemoy informacii.

Avtor obyazan zayavit' o potencial'nom konflikte interesov (naprimer, obstoyatel'stvah, kotorye, po ego mneniyu, mogut povliyat' na publikacionnyy process).

Pri obnaruzhenii znachitel'noy oshibki v publikacii, avtor obyazan nezamedlitel'no soobschit' ob etom redaktoru. Vo vremya podgotovki materiala k publikacii avtor obyazan sotrudnichat' s redaktorom i izdatelem i v sluchae neobhodimosti vvodit' v tekst sootvetstvuyuschie izmeneniya.

Avtor polnost'yu beret na sebya otvetstvennost' za vozmozhnyy plagiat teksta, risunkov i drugih materialov. Lyuboe narushenie avtorskih prav budet rassmotreno soglasno kriteriyam, predlozhennym COPE.

Avtor (ili kollektiv avtorov) osoznaet, chto neset pervonachal'nuyu otvetstvennost' za noviznu i dostovernost' rezul'tatov nauchnogo issledovaniya, chto predpolagaet soblyudenie sleduyuschih principov:

- avtory stat'i dolzhny predostavlyat' dostovernye rezul'taty provedennyh issledovaniy. Zavedomo oshibochnye ili sfal'sificirovannye utverzhdeniya nepriemlemy;

- avtory dolzhny garantirovat', chto rezul'taty issledovaniya, izlozhennye v predostavlennoy rukopisi, polnost'yu original'ny. Zaimstvovannye fragmenty ili utverzhdeniya dolzhny byt' oformleny s obyazatel'nym ukazaniem avtora i pervoistochnika. Chrezmernye zaimstvovaniya, a takzhe plagiat v lyubyh formah, vklyuchaya neoformlennye citaty, perefrazirovanie ili prisvoenie prav na rezul'taty chuzhih issledovaniy, neetichny i nepriemlemy;

- neobhodimo priznavat' vklad vseh lic, tak ili inache povliyavshih na hod issledovaniya, v chastnosti, v stat'e dolzhny byt' predstavleny ssylki na raboty, kotorye imeli znachenie pri provedenii issledovaniya;

- avtory ne dolzhny predostavlyat' v zhurnal rukopis', kotoraya byla otpravlena v drugoy zhurnal i nahoditsya na rassmotrenii, a takzhe stat'yu, uzhe opublikovannuyu v drugom zhurnale;

- soavtorami stat'i dolzhny byt' ukazany vse lica, vnesshie suschestvennyy vklad v provedenie issledovaniya. Sredi soavtorov nedopustimo ukazyvat' lic, ne uchastvovavshih v issledovanii;

- esli avtor obnaruzhit suschestvennye oshibki ili netochnosti v stat'e na etape ee rassmotreniya ili posle ee opublikovaniya, on dolzhen kak mozhno skoree uvedomit' ob etom redakciyu zhurnala.

Konflikt interesov

Stolknovenie interesov voznikaet, esli avtor (ili uchrezhdenie, v kotorom on/ona rabotaet), recenzent, redaktor ili lyuboy uchastnik processa podgotovki publikacii imeyut finansovye ili chastnye interesy (lichnye otnosheniya, nauchnoe sopernichestvo, intellektual'nye raznoglasiya i dr.), kotorye mogut negativno otrazit'sya na ih deystviyah.

Recenzenty predostavlyayut redakcii informaciyu o vozmozhnyh konfliktah interesov, kotorye mogut povliyat' na ih mnenie otnositel'no rukopisi. Pri nalichii takoy opasnosti oni vozderzhivayutsya ot recenzirovaniya dannogo materiala. Recenzenty ne mogut ispol'zovat' v sobstvennyh interesah rezul'taty rassmatrivaemoy raboty do ee publikacii.

Vse uchastniki processa podgotovki stat'i k publikacii obyazany raskryvat' informaciyu o lyubyh vzaimootnosheniyah, kotorye mogut rassmatrivat'sya kak potencial'nyy istochnik konflikta interesov.

Redakciya publikuet takuyu informaciyu, esli schitaet, chto ona mozhet okazat' vliyanie na ocenku rukopisi.

Data podgotovki dokumenta – 28.12.2017

1. The results of original fundamental and applied scientific researches on legal, pedagogical and psychological problems in relation to law enforcement are published in the Journal «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii».

The criteria for the selection of articles are compliance with the profile of the journal, novelty, relevance and validity of the results. Submitted manuscripts are not returned back. It is not allowed to send works to the editorial office that are published and / or accepted for publication in other editions. By submitting an article to the editor, the author agrees to an editorial revision of the material.

2. The work on the formation of the issue is carried out by the editorial board of the journal, which include Russian and foreign experts. The journal is published by the editorial board.

3. The journal is peer-reviewed. The reviewers are recognized qualified Russian and foreign experts in relevant fields of knowledge.

4. The Editorial Board provides for the review of all scientific materials, controls the compliance of the authors with the rules for the composition of articles.

5. Authors, reviewers, the Editorial Board and the editors of the journal comply with the provisions of the publication ethics.

6. The journal publishes, free of charge and without payment of the author's fee, up-to-date, original, objective and reasonable scientific materials, which were first sent to the press. The journal does not publish journalistic, popular and educational texts, advertising and other non-core materials.

7. The Editorial Board has the right to edit the title and text of scientific material, bibliography.

8. When forming the journal number, preference is given to materials:

– corresponding to the thematic profile and rubrics of the journal;

– containing a clear description of the problem and a reasoned author's version of its resolution;

– having an original character (prepared by the authors independently and not previously published);

– having a novelty of research (based on the results of their own scientific research and present new scientific knowledge);

– having a scientific presentation style (general language literacy, consistency, consistency, clarity, special terminology, the availability of references, etc.)

9. The article is submitted to the editors of the journal in printed and electronic form (through a personal account on the website of the Journal https://vestnikspbmvd.ru or by e-mail vestnik@univermvd.ru). Article is issued in accordance with the requirements for scientific articles in the Journal «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii».

10. The received article is registered in the articles registration journal with indication of the date of receipt, title, full name of an author(s). An individual registration number is assigned to an article.

11. After registration, the article is sent to the initial assessment by the editor-in-chief (assistant editor-in-chief), who appoints reviewers for the article.

12. After assigning reviewers, the personal data of the author (s) is deleted from the article. As such, the article is e-mailed to reviewers.

13. After conducting an expert assessment of the article, the reviewer sends to the editor a formed review.

14. The decision to publish an article is made by the Editorial Board of the Journal, depending on the results of the review and verification of the text of the manuscript for originality using specialized software.

With the originality of the text below 70% (while borrowing from one source can not be more than 7%, the borrowing is not allowed in the conclusions), the article is rejected.

No more than one article by one author, including the co-authorship, can be published in one issue of the Journal.

15. The editorial board sends an email to the author (s) about the decision taken on the article: publish, publish after revision, the letter provides recommendations for revision.

If it is decided to reject the publication, the reasons for such a decision are indicated.

The article, revised by the author according to the recommendations of the reviewer, is sent by the editors to the same reviewer for a second review.

16. If the article is recommended for publication, it undergoes editorial preparation – technical and literary editing, proofreading. The final version of the article prepared for publication, if necessary, is agreed with the author (s).

17. The next issue of the Journal includes articles in relation to which at the beginning of the layout (in accordance with the production schedule) there are reviews recommending publication and agreed with the author (s).

18. The Journal is a quarterly publication; coming out in March, June, September and December.

19. Distribution of the journal is carried out in accordance with the distribution list.

20. In accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, compulsory free copies of the journal are distributed.

21. Each issue of Journal are received by the University library.

22. Issues of Journal are distributed to the authors of articles and members of the Editorial Board in electronic form (sent by e-mail).

23. The copyrights to all materials published in the Journal belong to the founder and publisher.

24. The authors guarantee the Journal the right to reproduce unique materials in their work. In the case of unauthorized use by the authors of materials, the rights to which belong to third parties, the authors of the manuscript are responsible for their reproduction.

Finansirovanie izdaniya zhurnala osuschestvlyaetsya za schet sredstv uchreditelya zhurnala - Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii

The Journal reviews all materials submitted to the Editorial Board that are relevant to its topic in order to give expert evaluation. All peer-reviewers are recognized experts on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and have their own publications on the subject of the article under review during the last 3 years.

1. The form of the peer-review is double-blind.

2. The review of the supervisor (scientific supervisor) or the research adviser does not replace the peer-review.

3. The peer-reviewing of articles is free of charge for the authors.

4. The manuscript of a scientific paper, accepted by the Editorial Board in printed and electronic form, is considered by the editor-in-chief for compliance to the profile of the Journal, the requirements of article submission guidelines and is registered in the article registration logbook.

5. The submitted manuscript is considered during one month by the Editorial Board for compliance with the formal requirements of the Editorial Board of the Journal and after approval it is sent for a peer-review. The editor-in-chief (the deputy editor-in-chief) chooses the peer-reviewers.

6. Candidates and doctors of sciences including expert practitioners (practicians) with recognized authority and working in the scientific field relevant to articles topics are involved in peer-reviewing. The peer-review is signed by a specialist with an interpretation of the surname, name and patronymic, an indication of a scientific degree, academic rank, position, date of peer-review.

7. The peer-reviewer cannot be the author or co-author of the article under peer-reviewing, as well as (scientific) supervisor of the applicant for an academic degree and employees of the department where the author works.

8. The peer-reviewers are notified that the manuscripts submitted to them are intellectual property of the authors and are classified as the data that are not subject to disclosure, it is not allowed to make copies of the articles.

9. Infringement of confidentiality of information about the peer-reviewers and the authors of the articles is possible only in case of the peer-reviewer’s statement for unauthenticity or falsification of the materials made in the manuscript.

10. The term of preparing the peer-review is established in coordination with the peer-reviewer, but it cannot exceed two weeks from the moment of the manuscript receipt to the peer-reviewer (Reviewer's memo).

11. The peer-review should contain the qualified analysis of the material of the article, the objective and substantiated estimation of its material and reasonable recommendations about the improvement of quality of work. The peer-reviewer estimates the basic merits and demerits of the manuscript of the article, being guided thus by following criteria: conformity of the maintenance of the article to the Journal profile, relevance of the selected research topic, scientific and methodical level, use of necessary techniques of research, novelty and originality of fundamental principles and conclusions, practical use.

12. The peer-review is made under the standard form (Appendix 1) or in the free form with obligatory indication of the following matters:

- general analysis of the scientific level, terminology, structure of the article, the relevance of the research topic;

- scientific style, conformity of the methods, techniques, recommendations and results of researches used by the author to modern achievements of science and practice;

- the validity of the statement of the problem (issue) or the obtained results for the further development of theory and practice in the field of the research;

- discrepancies, errors, infringement of rules of citing admitted by the author;

- estimation of completeness of the article concerning language and style, its conformity to the established editorial requirements.

The final part of the peer-review should contain general conclusions and recommendation about expediency of its publication in the Journal or about the necessity of its completion.

13. In the case of a negative peer-review of the article in whole (the recommendation about inexpediency of its publication) the peer-reviewer should prove his conclusions. In the case of discrepancy of the article to one or several criteria the peer-reviewer specifies the necessity of completion of the article and makes recommendations to the author on the article improvement (with indication of errors admitted by the author).

14. The Editorial Board submits the results of the peer-review to the author (sends the copies of the peer-reviews or a reasoned refusal) and sends copies of the peer-reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation upon receipt of the relevant request to the Editorial Board.

15. Articles completed by the author repeatedly go to the peer-reviewer who has made critical comments.

16. In the case the author disagrees with the peer-reviewer’s opinion he or she may apply for re-reviewing or withdraw the article. This fact is fixed in a special register.

17. In the case of negative peer-review the article is transferred to another peer-reviewer who doesn’t know about the results of the previous peer-review. In the case of negative re-reviewing the copies of the negative peer-reviews go to the author to complete the article.

18. The final decision about expediency of the article publication after peer-reviewing is taken by the Editorial Board.

19. The cases of article reject:

- the theme of the article does not correspond with the scope of the Journal;

- the article is not adjusted properly and the authors refuse to update the articles;

- the article is not completed by the author after the peer-review.

20. The terms of article peer-reviewing are not longer than 3 months.

21. The peer-reviews are kept within 5 years since the moment of the peer-reviewer’s assent.

22. The articles accepted for the publication are not given back to the authors.

Poryadok otzyva (retrakcii) stat'i v zhurnale «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii»

(razrabotan na osnove rekomendaciy Soveta po etike nauchnyh publikaciy Associacii nauchnyh redaktorov i izdateley)

1. Otzyv teksta ot publikacii (retrakciya) predstavlyaet soboy mehanizm ispravleniya opublikovannoy informacii i opovescheniya chitateley o tom, chto publikaciya soderzhit ser'eznye nedostatki ili oshibochnye dannye, kotorym nel'zya doveryat'. Nedostovernost' dannyh mozhet yavlyat'sya rezul'tatom dobrosovestnogo zabluzhdeniya ili osoznannyh narusheniy. Retrakciya ispol'zuetsya i v sluchae obnaruzheniya dubliruyuschih publikaciy, plagiata, sokrytiya konflikta interesov, kotorye mogli povliyat' na interpretaciyu dannyh ili rekomendacii ob ih ispol'zovanii.

2. Osnovaniem dlya otzyva stat'i yavlyayutsya sleduyuschie fakty:

• obnaruzhenie nekorrektnyh zaimstvovaniy (plagiata) v publikacii;
• dublirovanie stat'i v neskol'kih izdaniyah;
• obnaruzhenie v rabote fal'sifikaciy ili fabrikaciy (naprimer, podtasovka eksperimental'nyh dannyh);
• obnaruzhenie v rabote ser'eznyh oshibok (naprimer, nepravil'naya interpretaciya rezul'tatov), chto stavit pod somnenie ee nauchnuyu cennost';
• nekorrektnyy sostav avtorov (vklyucheny lica, ne prinimavshie uchastie v napisanii stat'i, provedenii issledovaniya i t.d.; ne ukazany lica, prinimavshie neposredstvennoe uchastie v provedenii issledovaniya i napisanii stat'i);
• skryt konflikt interesov;
• perepublikaciya stat'i bez soglasiya avtora;
• stat'ya ne prohodila proceduru recenzirovaniya.

3. Iniciatorom nachala procedury otzyva (retrakcii) stat'i mogut byt':

• avtor(y) stat'i, kotoryy napravlyaet pis'mennoe motivirovannoe obraschenie v redakciyu zhurnala ob otzyve stat'i;
• glavnyy redaktor zhurnala, kotoryy gotovit obosnovannoe predstavlenie o prichinah otzyva publikacii;
• redakciya drugogo zhurnala, napravivshaya zapros v redakciyu zhurnala «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii»;
• inye lica, predstavivshie dokazatel'stva narusheniya nauchnoy etiki avtorom(ami) stat'i (naprimer, uchastniki konflikta interesov).

4. Otzyv (retrakciya) statey v zhurnale «Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii» osuschestvlyaetsya sleduyuschim obrazom:

4.1. Posle obrascheniya avtora ili drugogo lica, predostavivshego fakty narusheniya nauchnoy etiki v stat'e, redkollegiya zhurnala naznachaet komissiyu, kotoraya provodit vsestoronnee izuchenie sluchaya, s uchetom vseh imeyuschihsya faktov i vozmozhnostey proverki etichnosti publikacii;

4.2. Prinyav reshenie otozvat' stat'yu, redakciya ukazyvaet v protokole zasedaniya prichinu retrakcii (v sluchae obnaruzheniya plagiata - s ukazaniem na istochniki zaimstvovaniya), a takzhe datu retrakcii. Stat'ya i opisanie stat'i ostayutsya na internet-sayte zhurnala v sostave sootvetstvuyuschego vypuska zhurnala, no na elektronnuyu versiyu teksta nanositsya nadpis' OTOZVANA/RETRACTED i data retrakcii, eta zhe pometa stavitsya pri stat'e v oglavlenii vypuska. 

4.3. Redakciya ne udalyaet mehanicheski stat'i iz elektronnoy versii zhurnala i iz arhiva na sayte zhurnala, dlya soblyudeniya korrektnosti.

4.4. V Sovet po etike nauchnyh publikaciy Associacii nauchnyh redaktorov i izdateley (dlya vneseniya informacii v edinuyu bazu retragirovannyh statey) predostavlyaetsya protokol, v kotorom ukazyvaetsya data provedeniya zasedaniya, sostav zasedavshih, rezul'taty ekspertizy, obosnovannoe reshenie i zapolnennaya forma:

- FIO avtora i nazvanie stat'i;

- nazvanie izdaniya, iz kotorogo tekst otzyvaetsya;

- iniciator otzyva stat'i; 

- osnovanie dlya otzyva stat'i i data prinyatiya resheniya;

- ssylka na stranicu na sayte izdaniya, na kotoroy dana informaciya o retrakcii;

- vyhodnye dannye stat' i DOI (esli est');

- tematika (social'nye nauki; sel'skoe hozyaystvo i t.p.).

4.5. Informaciya ob otozvannyh tekstah peredaetsya v bazy nauchnoy informacii - NEB, KiberLeninka. Pri poluchenii zayavki na retrakciyu informaciya o stat'e i polnyy tekst ostayutsya na eLibrary.ru i v KiberLeninke, no dopolnyaetsya informaciey o retrakcii. Otozvannye stat'i i ssylki iz nih isklyuchayutsya iz RINC i ne uchastvuyut pri raschete pokazateley.

4.6. V sluchae ser'eznogo moral'nogo uscherba storonam konflikta interesov informaciya o fakte narusheniya nauchnoy etiki mozhet byt' peredana po mestu raboty avtora.

4.7. Redakciya ostavlyaet za soboy pravo prinimat' samostoyatel'no reshenie otnositel'no dal'neyshego sotrudnichestva s avtorami retragirovannyh statey (polnyy otkaz ot sotrudnichestva, otkaz ot sotrudnichestva na opredelennoe vremya, naznachenie dopolnitel'noy ekspertizy statey v sluchae povtornogo sotrudnichestva).

Obsuzhden i utverzhden na zasedanii redakcionnoy kollegii zhurnala (protokol № 2 ot 16.05.2019)

Plata za publikaciyu i recenzirovanie statey otsutstvuet

The frequency of the issue of the journal is 4 times a year, coming out in March, June, September and December. 

Journal Release Schedule

Download template Consent to the processing of personal data

Abakumova Ekaterina Institute of philosophy and law SB RAS (otdel social'nyh i pravovyh issledovaniy, starshiy nauchnyy sotrudnik)
from 01.01.2013 to 01.01.2020 candidate of jurisprudence sciences from 01.01.2009 to 01.01.2020

docent

ORCID:0000-0003-2340-3032

Abakumova Oksana Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry Internal Affairs of Russian Federation


ORCID:0000-0002-5314-0862

Abdulloev Abdullo Saint-Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia ( ad'yunkt)
graduate student


ORCID:0000-0003-0094-1196

Abramkin Aleksey Krasnodar University of the MIA of Russia ( ad'yunkt)
graduate student from 01.01.2018 to 01.01.1921
adjunct of jurisprudence sciences


ORCID:0000-0001-7549-7638

Abramova Lyubov' Siberian Law Institute of the MIA of Russia (Department of Criminal Procedure, deputy chief of department of Criminal Procedure)
employee


ORCID:0000-0002-5828-4734

Avdeev Vadim Avdeevich Yugra State University (criminal law and criminal process, Professor)
employee
doctor of jurisprudence sciences

professor

ORCID:0000-0002-8614-6996

Avdeeva Olga East Siberian Institute of the MIA of Russia
doctor of jurisprudence sciences

docent

ORCID:0000-0002-5771-4237

Avrutin Roman Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia (Kafedra administrativnoy deyatel'nosti OVD, Zamestitel' nachal'nika)
employee
candidate of jurisprudence sciences


ORCID:0000-0003-1140-8194

Akiev Arbi candidate of jurisprudence sciences from 01.01.2017 to 01.01.2020


ORCID:0000-0001-6540-9606

Akiev Arbi Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia
candidate of jurisprudence sciences


ORCID:0000-0001-6540-9606

Alaf'ev Mihail Siberian Law University


ORCID:0000-0001-6074-4704

Aleksandrov Andrey Krasnodarskiy universitet MVD Rossii (kafedra operativno-razysknoy deyatel'nosti v OVD, starshiy prepodavatel')
employee
candidate of jurisprudence sciences


ORCID:0000-0001-5995-7198

Alekseeva Elena Saint Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia (kafedra ugolovnogo processa, docent)
employee from 01.01.2019 until now
candidate of jurisprudence sciences


ORCID:0000-0002-9505-0523

Aleshina-Alekseeva Ekaterina Saint-Petersburg University of the MIA of Russia (kafedra ugolovnogo prava, starshiy prepodavatel')
employee


ORCID:0000-0002-1469-3704

Aliev Yakub Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry Internal Affairs of Russian Federation
doctor of jurisprudence sciences

professor

ORCID:0000-0003-4986-235X

Alontseva Elena Moscow University of the MIA of Russia named after V.Ya. Kikotya (Department of Criminal Procedure, Associate Professor)
employee
candidate of jurisprudence sciences

docent

ORCID:0000-0002-2008-4171

Aleshina-Alexeeva Ekaterina Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry Internal Affairs of Russian Federation (kafedra ugolovnogo prava, prepodavatel')
employee


ORCID:0000-0002-1469-3704

Amanatskiy Yury Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry Internal Affairs of Russian Federation
candidate of pedagogical sciences

docent

ORCID:0000-0002-2038-545X

Amelchakov Igor SAINT-PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ( nachal'nik)
employee
candidate of jurisprudence sciences

docent

ORCID:0000-0002-7232-9492

Amel'chakov Oleg Belgorod National Research University (kafedra konstitucionnogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava yuridicheskogo instituta )
graduate student


ORCID:0000-0003-4528-8987

• « 
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• …
• 27
•  »