The article deals with the analysis of the German idioms representing values, in particular, describing situations when the great value is attached to something, something is considered valuable and important, has high value, desirable or has no value, the ability to separate valuable things from not valuable is viewed. The results of research allow to reveal the peculiarities of interaction of the inner form and actual meaning in the contexts of use received from the Corpus of the Institute of the German language in Manheim. The pragmatic aspect of the analysis reflected the role and influence of presupposition on semantics of idioms in language space, implicitly expressed opinions of authors and impact on the addressee.
German idioms, values, contexts, corpus analysis, presupposition
1. Baranov A.N., Dobrovol'skij D.O. Principy semanticheskogo opisaniya frazeologii / Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2009. – C. 21–34.
2. Novoselec Z. Cultural models and motivation of idioms with the component ‘heart’ in Croation / Computational and Corpus-based Phraseology // Second International Conference, Europhras 2017 / Ed. Ruslan Mitkov. London, Springer, 2017. 461 p.
3. Hanks P. Mechanisms of meaning / Computational and Corpus-based Phraseology // Second International Conference, Europhras 2017 / Ed. Ruslan Mitkov. London, Springer, 2017. 461 p.
4. Dobrovol'skij D.O., Peppel' L. Diskursivnaya konstrukciya N v tom, chto i ee paralleli v drugih yazykah: kontrastivnoe korpusnoe issledovanie / Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. – 2016. – 6(34). – S. 164–175.
5. Suvorova E., Polyakova L. Double inference in the process of comprehension of Russian and English discourse complicated by an idiom / The southeast Asian journal of English language studies – Vol 24 (2): 43-57 .
6. Kovacs G. About the definition, classification, and translation strategies of idioms/ Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 8, 3 (2016) 85-101
7. Slovar' sociolingvisticheskih terminov / pod red. V.Yu. Mihal'chenko. M.: 2006, 312s.
8. Vuolteenaho J., Ameel L., Newby A. and Scott M. Language, Space and Power: Urban Entanglements / COLLEGIUM Studies across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social sciences 13. Helsinki: Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies. 1-27. 2012, P. 1-4.
9. Slovar' lingvisticheskih terminov / pod red. V.N. Yarcevoj. M.: Sovetskaya enciklopediya, 1990, 685 s.
10. Karttunen L. Presupposition: What went wrong? Proceedings of SALT 26: 705-731, 2016.
11. Golubeva T.M. Metafora kak yazykovoe sredstvo sozdaniya i aktualizacii obshchestvennyh ideologij / Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2016, №2, s.212-216.
12. Venhuizen N. J , Bos J., Hendriks P., Bronwer H. Discourse Semantics with Information structure / Journal of Semantics, Volume 35, Issue 1, 21 February 2018, P.127-169.
13. Larionova M.V. Presuppoziciya kak sposob manipulyatornogo vozdejstviya (na primere ispanskogo gazetno-publicisticheskogo diskursa) / Vestnik MGIMO universiteta. Filologiya. 2013, S.220-224.
14. Sidorenko A.V. Presuppoziciya i implicitnye smysly vyskazyvaniya / Lingua mobilis №2 (16), 2009.
15. Dijk V. Context and Cognition: Knowledge Frames and Speech Act Comprehension / Journal of Pragmatics Volume 1, Issue 3, September 1977, Pages 211-231.
16. Duden 11. Redewendungen. Wӧrterbuch der deutschen Idiomatik. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 2008. http://www.ids-mannheim.de/kl/.../korpora/ (data obrashcheniya 5.03.2019)
