, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.85 Криминалистика
The article presents the classification of samples for comparative research, the study of which will contribute to the correct choice of a tactical method of obtaining them. The material also contains an analysis of the scientific literature related to the classification and systematization of the category in question; alternative grounds for dividing into groups are proposed. Classifying comparative samples, the author focuses on certain problems that practitioners face. Namely: the possibility of obtaining samples for a comparative research before the initiation of a criminal case, the validity of the use of coercion to obtain them, as well as the possibility of using comparative material obtained in the framework of operational search activities for expert studies. In preparing the article, general scientific methods of empirical knowledge (comparison, description), general logical methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization, classification, as well as methods of system-structural analysis were used. The purpose of the study of the problems of obtaining samples is to provide a systematic classification of this category in order to improve the quality of crime investigation. The conclusions made in the article on issues related to obtaining comparative samples at the stage of pre-investigation check and the possibility of using samples obtained during operational search activities are logically presented in the proposed classification.
types of comparative samples, obtaining samples for comparative research in the process of operational search activities, possibility of obtaining samples before the initiation of a criminal case
1. Dolzhenko N. I. Obrazcy dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya i taktika polucheniya eksperimental'nyh obrazcov. – Moskva: Yurlitinform, 2003. – 103 s.
2. Isyutin-Fedotkov D. V., Muhin G. N. Poluchenie obrazcov dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya. – Moskva: Yurlitform, 2014. – 192 s.
3. Zhbankov V. A. Gnoseologicheskaya suschnost' obrazcov dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya // Trudy Vysshey shkoly Ministerstva ohrany obschestvennogo poryadka SSSR. –1967.– Vyp. 15. – S. 75–85.
4. Vinberg A. I. Obrazcy dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya / Praktika primeneniya novogo ugolovno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva : mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauch. trudov. – Moskva: VSh MOOP SSSR, 1962. – S. 46–48.
5. Zhbankov V. A. O ponyatii i suschnosti obrazcov dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya : sb. nauch. trudov / Vysshaya shkola Ministerstva obschestvennogo poryadka SSSR. – Moskva: VSh MOOP SSSR, 1965. – S. 147–148.
6. Ivanova E. S. Problemnye voprosy naznacheniya sudebnoy ekspertizy do vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela / Sotrudnichestvo v sfere ekspertnoy deyatel'nosti : materialy Mezhdunarodnogo kruglogo stola. – Moskva: Moskovskiy universitet MVD Rossii im. V.Ya. Kikotya, 2018. – S. 261–266.
7. Ivanova E. S. Otdel'nye problemy polucheniya obrazcov dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela / Aktual'nye voprosy predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya na sovremennom etape : materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii 24 noyabrya 2016 goda. – Sankt-Peterburg: SPbU MVD Rossii, 2017. – S. 74–77.
8. Brager D. K., Pogorelenko A. I. Problemy polucheniya obrazcov dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya v pravoprimenitel'noy praktike // Vestnik Belgorodskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. – 2010. – № 1/15. – S. 13–16.
9. Kudryavceva A. V., Kudryavceva Yu. A. Poluchenie obrazcov dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii (processual'naya priroda, poryadok, dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie). – Moskva: Yurlitform, 2014. – 208 s.
10. Isyutin-Fedotkov D. V. Ponyatie i suschnost' obrazcov dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya // Vestnik kriminalistiki. – 2004. – № 4. – S. 36–38.
