Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.85 Криминалистика
OKSO 40.05.03 Судебная экспертиза
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
TBK 7586 Судебная экспертиза
BISAC LAW041000 Forensic Science
In this article, the author continues his series of publications devoted to the problems of evidence in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case. The article considers one of the most controversial procedural ways to establish circumstances that are important for a criminal case – judicial examination. Draws attention to a serious procedural feature of an expert, reminding not so much the rights of participants of criminal proceedings considered in Chapter 8 (Criminal procedure code) of the Russian Federation, as the jurisdictional powers of the bodies of preliminary investigation and trial. The author believes that the opportunity given to the expert to assess the actual quality of the research objects and their total adequacy to formulate certain conclusions compare him to a scientific judge. The author examines in detail the reasons that encouraged the scientists to abandon the idea of an expert as a scientific judge, and comes to the conclusion that they are wrong and farfetched. This allows us to think about changes in the doctrinal and legislative approaches to the role of an expert as a subject of evidence in criminal proceedings, namely, the prospects for granting him the authority to establish certain factual circumstances through the use of special knowledge. At the same time, attention is drawn to the fact that the proposed innovations will inevitably require undamentally different approaches to the training of judicial experts, to their training and education as highly professional subjects with an appro-priate level of legal awareness, legal understanding and responsibility for the results of research and conclusions.
expert opinion, collection of evidence, special knowledge, legal examination, criminal procedure evidence, expert
1. Orlov Yu. K. Sudebnaya ekspertiza kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. – Moskva: RFCSE Minyusta Rossii, 2005. – 261 s.
2. Zayceva E. A. Koncepciya razvitiya instituta sudebnoy ekspertizy v usloviyah sostyazatel'nogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – Moskva: Yurlitin-form, 2010. – 424 s.
3. Bykov V. M. Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – Kazan': Poznanie, 2008. – 300 s.
4. Bychkova S. F. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: nauchnye, organizacionno-pravovye i metodicheskie osnovy. – Almaty: Zheti Zharfy, 2002. – 272 s.
5. Sheyfer S. A. Sistema sledstvennyh deystviy: kakovy puti ee razvitiya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2015. – № 2. – S. 5–16.
6. Dyablova Yu. L., Dyablov A. V. Mesto i rol' sudebnoy ekspertizy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. – 2008. – № 2. – S. 200–205.
7. D'yakonova O. G. Nekotorye voprosy sudebnoy ekspertizy i ih otrazhenie v trudah S. A. Sheyfera // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. – 2019. – T. 5. – № 4. – S. 164–172.
8. Rossinskiy S. B. Sledstvennye deystviya. – Moskva: Norma, 2018. – 240 s.
9. Zayceva E. A. Oposredovannoe poznanie v tvorcheskom nasledii Semena Abramovicha Sheyfera // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. – 2019. – T. 5. – № 4. – S. 15–22.
10. Rossinskiy S. B. Dokazyvanie po ugolovnomu delu: poznanie ili obosnovanie? // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2020. – № 5. – S. 80–87.
11. Rossinskiy S. B. O strukture ugolovno-processual'nogo dokazyvaniya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2017. – № 5. – S. 39–50.
12. Shtol'c V. I. Rukovodstvo k izucheniyu sudebnoy mediciny dlya yuristov. – Sankt-Peterburg: I. S. Levi, 1885. – 490 s.
13. Vladimirov L. E. Uchenie ob ugolovnyh dokazatel'stvah. – Tula: Avtograf, 2000. – 464 c.
14. Foynickiy I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. – T. 2. – Sankt-Peterburg: Al'fa, 1996. – 607 s.
15. Vyshinskiy A. Ya. Teoriya sudebnyh dokazatel'stv v sovetskom prave. – 3-e izd. – Moskva: Gosyurizdat, 1950. – 308 c.
16. Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa. – T. 2. – Moskva: Nauka, 1970. – 516 s.
17. Teoriya dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom processe / otv. red. N. V. Zhogin. – Moskva: Yurid. lit., 1973. – 736 c.
