, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.27 Гражданское право
The article is devoted to the analysis of paragraph 1 of the Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation N 695 dated 29 September 2002 and to the investigation of the practice in its application in the bodies’ activities of the executive and judicial branches. Currently there are no legal and regulatory acts with requirements for providing mandatory psychiatric examination by a medical psychiatric commission authorized by the federal executive body in the field of health care or by the executive body of a federal subject of the Russian Federation in the field of health care. This condition significantly limits the competition in this service market and entails the exclusion of a legal entity from participation in tenders. On the basis of systematic, historical and legal, specific sociological, formal logical and hermeneutic methods of the examination and interpretation, the authors make a conclusion about the absence of legislative limits when implementing health services in the area of mandatory psychiatric examination if the organization has a required licence for performing this kind of activity. When analysing actual restrictions the authors studied not only actual and repealed legal and regulatory acts but also contradictory jurisprudence practice and proposed their own recommendations for application of current legislation in order to prevent restricting competition in the market of healthcare delivery.
mandatory psychiatric assessment, healthcare management body, restricting competition, licencing, medical commission, medical activities
1. Bessarab N. S. Aktual'nye problemy medicinskogo prava v RF // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2019. – T. 9. – № 10-1. – S. 168–174.
2. Gorbunova O. V. Obschaya harakteristika dogovora okazaniya medicinskih uslug // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatischeva. – 2017. – T. 2. – № 4. – S. 90–98.
3. Zaharinskaya O. N., Zaycev N. G. Obyazatel'noe psihiatricheskoe osvidetel'stvovanie medrabotnikov // Pravovye voprosy v zdravoohranenii. – 2017. – № 2. – S. 84–89.
4. Kozlova M. Yu., Nikolaeva A. O. Osobennosti vozniknoveniya i usloviya okazaniya medicinskih uslug // Vestnik sovremennyh issledovaniy. – 2019. – № 1.9 (28). – S. 69–71.
5. Kozlova M. Yu., Nikolaeva A. O. Osobennosti osuschestvleniya i zaschity prav potrebitelya v sfere medicinskih uslug // Vestnik sovremennyh issledovaniy. – 2018. – № 4.1 (19). – S. 380–382.
6. Sayapina S. M. O dopuskah rabotnikov k otdel'nym vidam medicinskoy deyatel'nosti bez obyazatel'nogo psihiatricheskogo osvidetel'stvovaniya // Health and Social Care Journal. – 2017. – № 2 (5). – S. 9–25.
7. Sofronov A. G., Dobrovol'skaya A. E. Proekt regional'nogo plana razvitiya sistemy ohrany psihicheskogo zdorov'ya zhiteley Sankt-Peterburga // Obozrenie psihiatrii i medicinskoy psihologii imeni V. M. Behtereva. – 2020. – № 2. – S. 57–64.
8. Turkin M. M., Pushkarskaya E. V. Social'no-pravovye voprosy ohrany zdorov'ya v Rossiyskoy Federacii i SShA // Zakon i pravo. – 2020. – № 6. – S. 73–76.
9. Cherepov V. M., Vasil'eva T. P., Kukushkin I. G., Shatohin K. A. Aktual'nye voprosy standartizacii medicinskogo obespecheniya rabotayuschego naseleniya // Problemy standartizacii v zdravoohranenii. – 2020. – № 5–6. – S. 23–30.
10. Yunusov A. A., Yunusov S. A. Administrativno-pravovye osnovy ohrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Sovremennoe pravo. – 2020. – № 2. – S. 23–27.
