Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abay (Chair of Methods of Teaching Mathematics, Physics and Informatic, Head)
Almaty, Kazakhstan
Russian Federation
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
The article deals with the problem of analyzing trends in the formation of public consciousness and digital culture of students in the system of continuous teacher education. The conclusions are based on the fact that symbolic interactionism (information theory), socio-psychological centrality are based on the level of importance of certain ideas or self-conceit, the degree of interactivity in the implementation of acquired communicative and role models of student behavior. Moderate support for the theories of identity and symbolic interactionism was revealed, since the identity of the "other" was not much in the focus of research analysis. Identification aspects are related to the relationship between concepts, and interactive commitment is related to the psychological centrality of the student's personality, but not to the identification of the "other". Self-esteem is a Central element of the psychological centrality of the individual, if it is important for her. It is shown that identities can be stable and unstable, since they are associated with a person's social environment. Instability is associated with the student's desire to make social, religious, and cultural changes in their own lives, that is, with the desire to master and join new cultural values. The level of a person's self-esteem depends on the identification combination of socio-psychological (external and internal) aspects and conditions of their existence.
formation of public consciousness, digital culture, symbolic interactionism, socio-psychological centrality, degree of interactivity, communicative and role models of behavior, identity theory, identification aspects
1. Abylkassymova A.E. System modernization of general secondary education in the Republic of Kazakhstan //Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação. ISSN / eISSN: 1983-6597 / 2358-1425. - V.13. -N.32. – Brazil, 2020. –P.1-17.
2. A.E.Abylkassymova, S.K.Popey-ool, S.E.Shishov. On the theory of Personal identification in the system of Continuous Pedagogical Education (Analysis of foreign Experience) //Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. – ISSN 1991–3494. – Volume 3. – Number 379 (2019). –p.186–197.
3. Abylkassymova A.E., Kalnei V.A., Ryzhakov M.V., Shishov S.E. Development of public consciousness in pedagogical education in Russia and Kazakhstan //ICPE 2018 - International Conference on Psychology and Education. “The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS” 2018. ISSN: 2357-1330. – P.1-8. SHS Web of Conferences 2018 10.15405/epsbs.2018.11.02.1.
4. Abylkassymova A.E., Kalnei V.A., Shishov S.E. Formation of Public Consciousness, Spiritual and Moral Culture of Students in the System of Continuous Pedagogical Education //Tarih Kultur ve Sanat Arastirmalari Dergisi - Journal of History Culture and Art Research. ISSN: 2147-0626. – V.7. – Iss.1. - March 2018. – P.26-33. doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i1.1460. Impact Factor – 1,17.
5. Ashmore, R. D., & Jussim, L. (1997). Introduction: Toward a second century of the scientific analysis of self and identity. In R. D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). The self in social contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 297–332
7. Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224–237.
8. Chen, J., & Gardner, H. (2005). Assessment based on multiple intelligences theory. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 77-102). New York: Guilford Press
9. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books
10. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books
11. Glasersfeld, E. v. (1989). Facts and the self from a constructivist point of view. Poetics, 18, 435–448.
12. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more tha" IQ. New York: Bantam
13. Gray, J., & Viens, J. (1994). The theory of multiple intelligences: Understanding cognitive diversity in school. National Forum, 74 (1), 22–25
14. Grigorenko, E. L., & Jarvin, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). School-based tests of the triarchic theory of intelligence: Three settings, three samples, three syllabi. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 167-208
15. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books, r337
16. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic selfconcept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337
17. Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507-536
18. McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions (rev. ed.). New York: Free Press
19. McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., Child, P. & Fujioka, T. (1978) Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511–520.
20. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press, 2-34.
23. Roth, W.-M. (2011). Passibility: At the limits of the constructivist metaphor . Dordrecht: Springer.
24. Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (1987). The construction of self and the reconstruction of social relationships. Advances in Group Processes, 4, 41–66.
25. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316
26. Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience and role behavior: Theory and research example. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles and social behavior (pp. 199–218). New York: Springer-Verlag.
27. Thoits, P. (1995). Social psychology: The interplay between sociology and psychology. Social Forces, 73, 1231–1243
28. Thoits, P. A., & Virshup, L. K. (1997). Me’s and we’s: Forms and functions of social identities. In R. D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 106 - 133). Oxford: Oxford University Press
29. Viens, J., & Kallenbach, S. (2004). Multiple intelligences and adult literacy: A sourcebook for practitioners. New York: Teachers College Press. R.149
30. Wells, L. E., & Stryker, S. (1988). Stability and change in self over the life course. In P. B. Baltes & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 191–229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
