The present paper shows that the term “complexity” includes absolutely different notions than now it seems to be presented in modern science and philosophy. V.S. Stepin’s postnon-classics has come to this new recognition too close, but, actually, it is a new recognition of uncertainty for systems of the third type (not deterministic and not stochastic). We introduce the interpretation of a type I uncertainty that implies that stochastic methods show systems identified, but methods of the theory of chaos and self-organization and neurocomputing show significant difference of target systems (processes). The concrete examples show the type I uncertainty and give an idea of a type II uncertainty, that implies the coincidence of distribution functions f(x) for different samplings. We prove that neurocomputing method not only differentiates samplings, but also identifies order parameters. In this case we also solve the system synthesis problem.
theory of chaos and self-organization, complexity, order parameter, systems of the third type.
1. Es´kov V.M., Es´kov V.V., Karpin V.A., Filatov M.A. Sinergetika kak tret´ya paradigma, ili ponyatie paradigmy v filosofii i nauke. Filosofiya nauki.– 2011.– №4 (51).– S. 88–97.
2. Es´kov V.M., Karpin V.A., Fila-tov M.A., Filatova O.E. Filosofskie osnovaniya teorii patologii: problema prichinnosti v meditsine. Filosofiya nauki.– 2012.– №1(52).– S.118–128.
3. Dzhumagalieva L.B., Gudkova C.A., Es´kov V.M., Khadartsev A.A. Filosofskiy podkhod v interpretatsii statsionarnykh re-zhimov sotsial´nykh sistem. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassika.– 2014.– № 1.– S.42–53.
4. Es´kov V.M., Filatova O.E., Gud-kova S.A.. Filosofskie i sotsial´nye as-pekty dinamiki razvitiya obrazovaniya i nauki v Yugre – tipichnyy primer regio-nal´nykh protsessov vo vsey Rossii. Filo-sofskiy podkhod v interpretatsii statsio-narnykh rezhimov sotsial´nykh sistem. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassika.– 2014.– № 2.– S. 45–58.
5. Ivanitskiy G.R., Deev A.A., Khizh-nyak E.P. Mozhet li sushchestvovat´ dolgovre-mennaya strukturno-dinamicheskaya pamyat´ vody?. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk.– 2014.– T. 184.– №1.– S. 43–74.
6. Rozenberg G.S. Vvedenie v teore-ticheskuyu ekologiyu / V 2-kh t.; Izd. 2-e, is-pravlennoe i dopolnennoe.– Tol´yatti: Kassandra, 2013.– T. 1.– 565 s.
7. Rozenberg G.S. Vvedenie v teore-ticheskuyu ekologiyu / V 2-kh t.; Izd. 2-e, is-pravlennoe i dopolnennoe.– Tol´yatti: Kassandra, 2013.– T. 2.– 445 s.
8. Stepin V.S. Tipy nauchnoy ra-tsional´nosti i sinergeticheskaya para-digma. Slozhnost´. Razum. Postneklassika.– 2013.– № 4.– S. 45–59.
9. Eskov V.M., Eskov V.V., Filato-va O.E. Characteristic features of measure-ments and modeling for biosystems in phase spaces of states. Measurement Techniques (Medical and Biological Measurements).– 2011.– v. 53 (12).– P. 1404–1410.
10. Eskov V.M., Gavrilenko T.V., Koz-lova V.V., Filatov M.A. Measurement of the dynamic parameters of microchaos in the be-havior of living biosystems. Measurement Techniques.– 2012.– Vol. 55.– №. 9.– P. 1096–1100.
11. Eskov V.M., Eskov V.V., Filato-va O.E., Filatov M.A. Two types of systems and three types of paradigms in systems phi-losophy and system science. Journal of Bio-medical Science and Engineering.– 2012.– Vol. 5.– № 10.– P. 602–607.
12. Eskov V.M. Evolution of the emer-gent properties of three types of societies: The basic law of human development, Emergence: Complexity and Self-organizatio. 2014.– 16(2).– P. 107–115.
13. Horgan J. The End Of Science: Fac-ing The Limits Of Knowledge In The Twilight Of The Scientific Age. New York: Broadway Books.– 1996.– 322 P.
14. Penrose R., The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning computers, minds and the laws of physics, Oxford University Press (Ox-ford), 1989.
15. Prigogine I. The Die Is Not Cast. Futures. Bulletin of the Word Futures Studies Federation.– 2000.– Vol. 25.– № 4.– P. 17–19.
16. Weaver W. Science and Complexity. Rokfeller Foundation, New York City. American Scientist.– 1948.– P. 36: 536–544.
