The article attempts to integrate existential, cultural, sociological and psychological approaches to the problem of trust based on the category "meaning". The phenomenon of trust is relevant because of the following fact: people are beings who are voluntarily at each other's disposal and, accordingly, are vulnerable to each other. A trust is an attitude in which this fundamental vulnerability is exchanged for humanity. That is why humanity is attributed to persons. At the same time, trust and mistrust are an integral aspect of the processes of meaning formation and embodiment. That processes are related to intersubjective meaning formations (intensional structures and contexts) of lifeworlds. Lifeworlds are spheres of human existence. First embodiment of the trust intensive structure is socio-cultural patterns and institutions. They are embodied in social meanings and people relations. The social sphere which trust embodies is the circulation of gifts (potlatch). Finally, relevant existential, socio-cultural and social meanings find embody in various subjective manifestations of trust. That occurs because people are participants in existential, socio-cultural and social relations mediated by their psychology. But a person can also obtain agency and enter the sphere of "absolute relations with the absolute" as in being, in which faith/trust becomes the very way of being.
trust, meaning, meaning-making, embodiment, potlatch, trust economy
1. Auzan A. U nas sistema ustroena tak, chto pensioner pozhiraet pionera. Interv'yu 10 oktyabrya 2018. - http://contentking.ru/video/2018/10/10/aleksandr_auzan
2. Brovin V. Potlach — indeyskiy obychay, kotoryy ob'yasnyaet, kuda ty spuskaesh' vsyu zarplatu. - https://disgustingmen.com/history/potlatch-and-consumer-society
3. Vitgenshteyn L. Filosofskie raboty. Chast' I. - M.: Izdatel'stvo «Gnozis», 1994. — 612 s.
4. Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filos. germenevtiki — M.: Progress, 1988.-704 s.
5. Gusserl' E. Kartezianskie meditacii. - M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2010. - 229 s.
6. Delez Zh. Logika smysla. - M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2011. — 472 s.
7. Derrida Zh. Pozicii. - M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2007. — 160 s.
8. K'erkegor S. Strah i trepet. - M.: Kul'turnaya revolyuciya, 2010. - 488 s.
9. Leont'ev A. N. Filosofiya psihologii: Iz nauchnogo naslediya. – M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1994.— 228 s.
10. Maturana Umberto, Varela Francisko. Drevo poznaniya. – M.: Progress-tradiciya, 2001 – 224 s.
11. Moos M. Obschestva. Obmen. Lichnost'. Trudy po social'noy antropologii. – M.: KDU, 2001. – 416 s.
12. P. Burd'e. Prakticheskiy smysl. — SPb.: Aleteyya, 2001 g. — 562 s.
13. Sartr Zh. P. Bytie i nichto: Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii. - M.: Respublika, 2000. — 639 s.
14. Seligmen A. Problema doveriya. - M.: Ideya-Press, 2002. — 256
15. Sloterdayk, P. Kritika cinicheskogo razuma. — Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, M.: ACT MOSKVA, 2009. — 800 s.
16. Turen A. Vozvraschenie cheloveka deystvuyuschego. Ocherk sociologii. — M.: Nauchnyy mir, 1998. — 204 s
17. Tyurikov A.G., Bol'shunov A.Ya. Informacionnye tehnologii kak social'nyy vyzov XXI veka // Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. – 2019. – T. 9, 2(38). – S. 6-10.
18. Fukuyama F. Doverie: social'nye dobrodeteli i put' k procvetaniyu. — M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo ACT»: ZAO NPP «Ermak», 2004. — 730
19. Haydegger Bytie i vremya. – M.: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2011. – 460 s.
20. Harari Yu. N. Homo Deus. Kratkaya istoriya buduschego / Yu. N. Harari — Izdatel'stvo «Sindbad», 2015 – 580 s.
21. Hasidskaya mudrost' / Sost. Lavskiy V.V. – M.: Aleteya, 199, - 280 s.
22. Hosking Dzheffri Ekonomika doveriya http://www.zh-zal.ru/nz/2010/5/ho7.html
23. Chalmers D. Soznayuschiy um: V poiskah fundamental'noy teorii. - M: URSS: Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM», 2013. — 512 s.
24. Shtompka P. Doverie — osnova obschestva. — M.: Logos, 2012. — 440 s.
25. Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. – M.: Politizdat, 1991. – 527 s.
26. Yaspers K. Filosofiya. Kniga vtoraya. Prosvetlenie ekzistencii. – M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitaciya», 2001. – 448 s.
27. Bolshunov A.Y., Tyurikov A.G., Chernyshova L.I. (2019) “Society of Trust”: The Essence, the Present and the Future. In: Popkova E., Ostrovskaya V. (eds) Perspectives on the Use of New Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Modern Economy. ISC 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 726. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90835-9_121
28. Derrida J. The gift of death. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ltd., London, 1995, 115 p.
29. Esposito M. Oikonomia: una genealogia della comunita. Tönnies, Durkheim, Mauss. - https://www.academia.edu/38661945/Oikonomia_una_genealogia_della_comunità._Tönnies_Durkheim_Mauss
30. Gregg D. Caruso and Owen Flanagan (eds.), Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, Oxford University Press, 2018, 368pp
31. Snowdon P. «Shell Global Scenarios to 2025». http://www.iea.org/media/workshops/2007/egrd/Snowdon.pdf
32. Voros S. THE AUTOPOIESIS OF PEACE: EMBODIMENT, COMPASSION, AND THE SELFLESS SELF. https://www.academia.edu/10886101/V%C3%B6r%C3% B6s_Sebastjan._2014_._The_Autopoiesis_of_Peace_Embodiment_Compassion_and_the_Selfless_S elf_._Poligrafi_in_press_pre-print_version_please_quote_the_original
33. What Does a Human Have That He Can Give Away? An Interview with Peter Sloterdijk by Sjoerd van Tuinen. - https://www.academia.edu/9185150/What_Does_a_Human_Have_that_He_Can_Give_Away_-
34. William Pawlett. Gifts and Reciprocity. - https://www.academia.edu/14297025/GIFTS_AND_RECIPROCIT
