employee from 01.01.1997 until now
Omsk, Russian Federation
UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.77 Уголовное право
OKSO 40.02.02 Правоохранительная деятельность
BBK 674 Отрасли права
TBK 7581 Уголовное право
BISAC LAW026010 Criminal Law / Juvenile Offenders
The article researches the practice of delimiting an accomplice from a co-executor. In cases where an accomplice intellectually or physically assists in the commission of a crime in the future or promises to provide such assistance after its completion, problems with the qualifications of his actions, as a rule, do not arise. A particular difficulty represents the legal assessment of the elimination of obstacles by the accomplice of the encroachment by the “main” performer. The author sets himself the goal of a scientifically grounded definition of the type of accomplice in a crime, which contributes to its commission by eliminating obstacles in the process of fulfilling the objective side. To achieve this goal, the normative and formal legal approaches were used, the decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the doctrinal provisions of the criminal were studied were studied. In the article, the author reasonably proposes that a person who removes obstacles to the implementation of the method of crime during the execution of its objective side be recognized as a co-executor. When deciding on the content of the objective side, one should issue not only from the abstract features of the corresponding composition, but also take into account the specific method of the actually committed encroachment. It is proposed to clarify in the legislative definition of an accomplice that a person who contributed to the commission of a crime by eliminating obstacles is recognized as an accomplice only if such elimination was carried out at the stage of preparation for the crime.
complicity, groups of persons, co-executor, accomplice, removing obstacles, objective side, the way of committing a crime
1. Pudovochkin Yu. E. Kvalifikaciya souchastiya v prestuplenii. Sudebnaya praktika : nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. – Moskva: Rossiyskiy gos. un-t pravosudiya, 2017. – 176 s.
2. Sharapov R. D., Minin R. V. Posobnichestvo prestupleniyu: zakon, teoriya, praktika // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2018. – № 6. – S. 140–147.
3. Brilliantov A. V., Yani P. S. Primenenie norm o souchastii: analogiya ili tolkovanie? // Zakonnost'. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 31–36.
4. Ivanov N. G. Kategorii «souchastie» i «gruppa» v resheniyah Verhovnogo Suda RF (vnov' o nabolevshem) // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. – 2019. – № 1. – S. 42–48.
5. Pudovochkin Yu. E. Osobennosti ob'ektivnoy storony prestupleniya, sovershennogo v souchastii // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. – 2018. – № 3. – S. 3–9.
6. Danilov D. O., Yani P. S. Soispolnitel'stvo (gruppa lic, gruppa lic po predvaritel'nomu sgovoru): poziciya vysshego sudebnogo organa // Zakonnost'. – 2020. – № 1. – S. 41–45.
7. Kashepov V. P. Sudebnye oshibki pri kvalifikacii ob'ektivnoy storony sostava prestupleniya // Kommentariy sudebnoy praktiki / otv. red. K. B. Yaroshenko. – Vyp. 23. – Moskva: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve RF, Kontrakt, 2018. – S. 148–160.
8. Kokin D. M. Souchastie v prestuplenii. Lekciya // Mir politiki i sociologii. – 2018. – № 5–6. – S. 68–81.
9. Afanas'eva O. R. Sposob soversheniya prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie i sposoby zakrepleniya v stat'yah ugolovnogo zakona // Aktual'nye voprosy bor'by s prestupleniyami. – 2018. – № 1. – S. 4–8.
10. Hilyuta V. V. Sovmestnoe sovershenie hischeniya gruppoy lic // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2008. – № 5. – S. 48–54.
11. Lebedev A. E. Soispolnitel' kak samostoyatel'nyy vid souchastnika prestupleniya // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii. – 2016. – № 1. – S. 119–124.
12. Obrazhiev K. V. Posobnichestvo prestupleniyu: problemy ugolovno-pravovoy ocenki // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2019. – № 3. – S. 59–70.
13. Nekoz S. S. K voprosu o celesoobraznosti obosobleniya posobnichestva ot inyh vidov souchastiya v prestuplenii // Vestnik Universiteta Prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii. – 2020. – № 5. – S. 29–33.
