employee
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
graduate student
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
employee
Moskva, Moscow, Russian Federation
Subject. A comparative assessment of the state of the stomatognathic system on the example of the bioelectrical activity of temporal and masticatory muscles in patients who used removable implant-supported overdentures with bar fixation system, made by two different methods: traditional and using digital methods of treatment planning and manufacturing was carried out. Objectives. To compare the changes of bioelectrical activity of temporal and masticatory muscles in patients with removable implant-supported overdentures made by two different methods: traditional and digital, who used dentures for a long time (12 months). Methods. Bioelectrical activity and symmetry of temporal and masseter muscles were investigated clinically by surface electromyography. Electromyography was performed in five probes: Rest, Light CO, Natural Swallowing, Maximal Volitional Clench (MVC) and Clench on Cotton Rolls (MVCCR). Results. In patients using overdentures produced in traditional way, no normal values of muscle activity were observed in any of the probes at the end of the study. In patients who used overdentures, made with the use of digital technologies, we noted a decrease of bioactivity of the muscles in the probes of Rest and Light CO, and an increase of biopotentials in the probes of MVC and MVCCR. The values obtained at the end of the study were characterized as normal or acceptable. Conclusions. The application of a digital method of treatment planning and fabrication of removable implant-supported overdentures with a bar fixation system allows to achieve more physiological values of temporal and masticatory muscles biopotentials, which can be interpreted as recovery of the functional integrity of the stomatognathic system.
electromyography, bioelectrical activity of muscles, symmetry of muscles, implants, removable implant-retained overdenture
1. Dubova L.V., Ozhigov E.M., Tagil'cev D.I., Stupnikov A.A. Analiz pokazaniy elektromiografii u pacientov so s'emnymi pokryvnymi protezami s oporoy na implantaty pri dlitel'nom pol'zovanii. Problemy stomatologii. 2019;3:139-145. [L.V. Dubova, E.M. Ozhigov, D.I. Tagiltsev, A.A. Stupnikov. Analysis of electromyography indications in patients with implant-supported removable covering dentures with prolonged use. Actual problems in dentistry. 2019;3:139-145. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41212357
2. Dubova L.V., Mel'nik A.S., Stupnikov A.A., Savel'ev V.V. Sravnitel'naya ocenka pokazateley u pacientov bez priznakov patologii VNChS i s myshechno-sustavnoy disfunkciey. Endodontiya Today. 2016;2:11-15. [L.V. Dubova, A.S. Melnik, A.A. Stupnikov, V.V. Savelyev. Comparative assessment of indicators in patients without signs of TMJ pathology and with musculo-articular dysfunction. Endodontics Today. 2016;2:11-15. (In Russ.)].
3. Kazakova V.P., Venatovskaya N.V. Rol' neyromyshechnoy stomatologii v praktike vracha – stomatologa. Byulleten' medicinskih internet-konferenciy. 2017;10:1545-1547. [V.P. Kazakova, N.V. Venatovskaya. The role of neuromuscular dentistry in the practice of a dentist. Bulletin of medical Internet conferences. 2017;10:1545-1547. (In Russ.)].
4. Kopeykin V.N., Mirgazizov M.Z., Malyy A.Yu. Oshibki v ortopedicheskoy stomatologii. Prof. i mediko–pravovye aspekty. Moskva : Medicina. 2–e izd. 2002:239. [V.N. Kopeikin, M.Z. Mirgazizov, A.Yu. Maly. Errors in orthopedic dentistry. Prof. and medico-legal aspects. Moscow: Medicine. 2nd ed. 2002:239. (In Russ.)].
5. Olesova V.N., Davtyan A.M. Zamkovye krepleniya protezov v klinike ortopedicheskoy implantologii. Institut stomatologii. 2000;3:40-42. [V.N. Olesova, A.M. Davtyan. Locks for prostheses in the clinic of orthopedic implantology. Institute of Dentistry. 2000;3:40-42. (In Russ.)].
6. Ol'shanskaya T.A., Vorob'eva M.V. Problema fiksacii s'emnyh protezov pri polnom otsutstvii zubov. Nauka Rossii: Celi i zadachi. 2017:25-28. [T.A. Olshanskaya, M.V. Vorobieva. The problem of fixing removable dentures in the absence of teeth. Science of Russia: Aims and Objectives. 2017:25-28. (In Russ.)].
7. Paraskevich V.L. Razrabotka sistemy dental'nyh implantatov dlya reabilitacii bol'nyh s polnym otsutstviem zubov : avtoref. diss. … dokt. med. nauk. 14.00.21. Moskva, 2008:47. [V.L. Paraskevich. Development of a system of dental implants for the rehabilitation of patients with complete absence of teeth: author. diss. … doct. med. sciences. 14.00.21. Moscow, 2008:47. (In Russ.)].
8. Yaremenko A.I. Illyustraciya sposobov protezirovaniya na dental'nyh implantatah. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Biologiya, klinicheskaya medicina. 2011;1:199-203. [A.I. Yaremenko. Illustration of methods of prosthetics on dental implants. Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: Biology, Clinical Medicine. 2011;1:199-203. (In Russ.)].
9. Yaremenko A.I. Osobennosti dental'noy implantacii i protezirovaniya u bol'nyh s narusheniyami okklyuzii. Institut stomatologii. 2011;1:94-95. [A.I. Yaremenko. Features of dental implantation and prosthetics in patients with occlusion disorders. Institute of Dentistry. 2011;1:94-95. (In Russ.)].
10. Adell R. A 15—year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw // International journal of oral surgery. – 1981;6;10:387-416.
11. Adell R. Long—term follow—up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws // The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. – 1990;4;5:347-359.
12. Harris D. A comparison of implant—retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life in edentulous patients: a randomized, prospective, within—subject controlled clinical trial // Clinical oral implants research. – 2013;1;24:96-103.
13. Kent G., Johns R. Effects of osseointegrated implants on psychological and social well—being: a comparison with replacement removable prostheses // The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. – 1994;1;9:103-106.
14. Kusumoto Y. Impact of implant superstructure type on oral health—related quality of life in edentulous patients // Clinical implant dentistry and related research. – 2020.
15. Mumcu E. Comparison of four—implant—retained overdentures and implant—supported fixed prostheses using the All—on—4 concept in the maxilla in terms of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and marginal bone loss: a 2—year retrospective study // Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985). – 2020:388-396.
16. Nuño L.A. Electromyographic activity (EMG) of masseter and temporal muscles in edentulous patients before and after complete dentures // Practica odontologica. – 19908;11:54-56.
17. Pan Y.-H., Lin T.-M., Liang C.-H. Comparison of patient's satisfaction with implant—supported mandibular overdentures and complete dentures // Biomedical journal. – 2014;3;37:156-162.
18. Ramadan R.E., Mohamed F.S. Retention of mandibular implant—retained overdentures with two different attachment designs: An in vitro study // The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. – 2020.
19. Raustia A.M., Salonen M.A., Pyhtinen J. Evaluation of masticatory muscles of edentulous patients by computed tomography and electromyography // Journal of oral rehabilitation. – 1996;1;23:11-16.
20. Rinke S. Implant—supported overdentures with different bar designs: A retrospective evaluation after 5—19 years of clinical function // The journal of advanced prosthodontics. – 2015;4;7:338-343.
21. Schroeder A. The accumulation of osteocementum around a dental implant under physical loading // Schweizerische Monatsschrift fur Zahnheilkunde = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto—stomatologie. – 1978;10;88:1051-1058.
22. Thomason J. Mark The use of mandibular implant—retained overdentures improve patient satisfaction and quality of life // The journal of evidence—based dental practice. – 2010;1;10:61-63.
23. Weinländer M., Piehslinger E., Krennmair G. Removable implant—prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five—year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts // The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. – 2010;3;25:589-597.
24. Zarb G.A., Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in posterior partially edentulous patients // The International journal of prosthodontics. – 1993;2;6:189-196.
25. Zarb G.A., Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto Study. Part II: The prosthetic results // The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. – 1990;1;64:53-61.
26. Zarb G.A., Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered // The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. – 1990;2;64:185-194.
